Skip to main content

Evolution of Cooperation in Spatial Prisoner’s Dilemma Game Based on Incremental Learning

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of 2017 Chinese Intelligent Automation Conference (CIAC 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering ((LNEE,volume 458))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1461 Accesses

Abstract

The evolution of cooperation among intelligent agents is a fundamental issue in multi-agent systems. It is well accepted that the individual strategy-updating rules play a significant role in the cooperation dynamics on graphs. The imitation mechanisms account for a large proportion of these rules, in which an individual will choose a neighbor with higher payoff and follows its strategy. In this paper, we propose a strategy-updating rule based on incremental learning process for continuous prisoner’s dilemma game. Under our strategy-updating rule, each individual refreshes its decision according to original strategy (self-opinion) and new strategy learnt from one of neighbors (social-opinion). The simulation results show the incremental learning rule can enhance cooperation dramatically when individual has higher resistance to imitate others or lower payoff sensitivity. We also find that the incremental learning rule has greater influence when individual obtains fewer information of neighbors’ payoff. The reason behind the phenomena is also given. Our results may shed some light on how cooperative strategies are actually adopted and spread in spatial network.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Luke S, Sullivan K, Panait L, Balan G (2005) Tunably decentralized algorithms for cooperative target observation. In Proceedings of the fourth international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems. ACM, pp 911–917

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gheorghe M, Holcombe M, Kefalas P (2001) Computational models of collective foraging. BioSystems 61(2):133–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Camorlinga S, Barker K, Anderson J (2004) Multiagent systems for resource allocation in peer-to-peer systems. In Proceedings of the winter international symposium on Information and communication technologies. Trinity College, Dublin, pp 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  4. Tanimoto J (2007) A study on a difference of dynamics between discrete and continuous strategies of a multi player game having linear payoff structure. Ipsj J 48(7):2372–2376

    Google Scholar 

  5. Axelrod R (1984) The evolution of cooperation. Basic books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  6. Szabó G, Fath G (2007) Evolutionary games on graphs. Phys Rep 446(4):97–216

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Nowak MA (2006) Five rules for the evolution of cooperation. Science 314(5805):1560–1563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Du J, Wu B, Altrock PM, Wang L (2014) Aspiration dynamics of multi-player games in finite populations. J R Soc Interface 11(94):20140077

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bendor J, Swistak P (1995) Types of evolutionary stability and the problem of cooperation. Proc Natl Acad Sci 92(8):3596–3600

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Szolnoki A, Perc M, Danku Z (2008) Making new connections towards cooperation in the prisoner’s dilemma game. EPL (Europhys Lett) 84(5):50007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Macy MW, Flache A (2002) Learning dynamics in social dilemmas. Proc Natl Acad Sci 99(suppl 3):7229–7236

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Marchiori D, Warglien M (2008) Predicting human interactive learning by regret-driven neural networks. Science 319(5866):1111–1113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Traulsen A, Semmann D, Sommerfeld RD, Krambeck HJ, Milinski M (2010) Human strategy updating in evolutionary games. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107(7):2962–2966

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhong W, Kokubo S, Tanimoto J (2012) How is the equilibrium of continuous strategy game different from that of discrete strategy game? BioSystems 107(2):88–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is partly supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China under grant No. 61300087, No. 61702076 and No. 61502069; “the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities” under grant No. DUT17RW131.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiujuan Xu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Zhao, X., Xu, Z., Han, X., Tian, L., Xu, X. (2018). Evolution of Cooperation in Spatial Prisoner’s Dilemma Game Based on Incremental Learning. In: Deng, Z. (eds) Proceedings of 2017 Chinese Intelligent Automation Conference. CIAC 2017. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 458. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6445-6_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6445-6_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-6444-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-6445-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics