Abstract
Qualitative research on sensitive topics is often an emotional journey, not only for the participants but for others that may be involved along the way. It is now more than 20 years since Raymond Lee authored the seminal works Doing Research on Sensitive Topics, Researching Sensitive Topics, and Dangerous Fieldwork that raised the awareness of the challenges that researchers can face. More recently, Lee and Lee (2012) warned that the emotional challenges that researchers face when doing fieldwork are now difficult to ignore. Given this warning and the growing numbers of reports from researchers, both empirically and in reflective accounts, an examination of the issues is timely for both novice and experienced researchers. Drawing on earlier empirical work with researchers in Australia (Dickson-Swift 2005) and published accounts, this chapter provides an overview of the emotional challenges inherent in this type of research. Suggestions for researchers, research supervisors, and others involved in the research team are presented. These can be adopted by academic or research institutions to ensure that researchers have the necessary support to carryout this important research.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Anleu S, Mack K. Magistrates’ everyday work and emotional labour. J Law Soc. 2005;32(4): 590–614.
Ashforth B, Humphrey RH. Emotional labour in service roles: the influence of identity. Acad Manag Rev. 1993;18:88–115.
Australian Guidance and Counselling Association. Code of ethics. Canberra: Australian Guidance and Couselling Association; 1997.
Australian Nursing Council. Code of conduct for nurses in Australia. Canberra: Australian Nursing Council; 2003.
Australian Psychological Society. Code of ethics. Melbourne: Australian Psychological Society; 2002.
Bahn S. Keeping academic field researchers safe: ethical safeguards. J Acad Ethics. 2012;10(2): 83–91.
Bahn S, Weatherill P. Qualitative social research: a risky business when it comes to collecting ‘sensitive’ data. Qual Res. 2012; https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794112439016.
Bailey S, Scales K, Llyod J, Schneider J, Jones R. The emotional labour of health-care assistants in inpatient dementia care. Ageing Soc. 2015;35(02):246–69.
Band-Winterstein T, Doron I, Naim S. ‘I take them with me’ – reflexivity in sensitive research. Reflective Pract. 2014;15(4):530–9.
Bellas ML. Emotional labor in academia: the case of professors. Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci. 1999;561:91–110.
Benoot C, Bilsen J. An auto-ethnographic study of the disembodied experience of a novice researcher doing qualitative cancer research. Qual Health Res. 2015; https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315616625.
Bloor M, Fincham B, Sampson H. Qualti (NCRM) commissioned inquiry into the risk to well-being of researchers in qualitative research. Cardiff ESRC National Centre for Research Methods. Cardiff University, Wales; 2007.
Bloor M, Fincham B, Sampson H. Unprepared for the worst: risks of harm for qualitative researchers. Methodol Innov. 2010;5(1):45–55.
Bowtell EC, Sawyer SM, Aroni RA, Green JB, Duncan RE. “Should I send a condolence card?” Promoting emotional safety in qualitative health research through reflexivity and ethical mindfulness. Qual Inq. 2013;19(9):652–63.
Campbell R. Emotionally involved: the impact of researching rape. New York: Routledge; 2002.
Carroll K. Infertile? The emotional labour of sensitive and feminist research methodologies. Qual Res. 2013;13(5):546–61.
Coles J, Astbury J, Dartnall E, Limjerwala S. A qualitative exploration of researcher trauma and researchers’ responses to investigating sexual violence. Violence Against Women. 2014;20(1):95–117.
Corden A, Sainsbury R, Sloper R, Ward B. Using a model of group psychotherapy to support social research on sensitive topics. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8(2):151–60.
Cotton S, Dollard M, de Jonge J, Whetham P. Clergy in crisis. In: Dollard M, Winefield AH, Winefield HR, editors. Occupational stress in the service professionals. London: Taylor and Francis; 2003.
Darlington Y, Scott D. Qualitative research in practice: stories from the field. St. Leonards: Allen and Unwin; 2002.
Dickson-Swift V, James E, Kippen S. Do university ethics committees adequately protect public health researchers? Aust N Z J Public Health. 2005;29(6):576–82.
Dickson-Swift V, James EL, Kippen S, Liamputtong P. Risk to researchers in qualitative research on sensitive topics: issues and strategies. Qual Health Res. 2008;18(1):133–44.
Dickson-Swift V, James BL, Kippen S, Liamputtong P. Researching sensitive topics: qualitative research as emotion work. Qual Res. 2009;9(1):61–79.
Etherington K. Working with traumatic stories: from transcriber to witness. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2007;10(2):85–97.
Fahie D. Doing sensitive research sensitively: ethical and methodological issues in researching workplace bullying. Int J Qual Methods. 2014;13:17.
Fincham B, Scourfield J, Langer S. The impact of working with disturbing secondary data: reading suicide files in a coroner’s office. Qual Health Res. 2008;18(6):853–62.
Fitzpatrick P, Olson RE. A rough road map to reflexivity in qualitative research into emotions. Emot Rev. 2015;7(1):49–54.
Gair S. In the thick of it: a reflective tale from an Australian social worker/qualitative researcher. Qual Health Res. 2002;12(1):130–9.
Gilbert KR. Collatoral damage? Indirect exposure of staff members to the emotions of qualitative research. In: Gilbert KR, editor. The emotional nature of qualitative research. London: CRC; 2001. p. 147–61.
Goffman E. The presentation of self in everyday life. Harmondsworth: Penguin; 1959.
Grandey A, Foo S, Groth M, Goodwin R. Free to be you and me: a climate of authenticity alleviates burnout from emotional labor. J Occup Health Psychol. 2012;17(1):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025102.
Grauel T. Overseeing the overseers: supervision of christian clergy in Australia. In: McMahon M, Patton W, editors. Supervision in the helping professions: a practical approach. Sydney: Prentice Hall; 2002. p. 261–72.
Gregory D, Russell CK, Phillips LR. Beyond textual perfection: transcribers as vulnerable persons. Qual Health Res. 1997;7(2):294–300.
Harris LC. The emotional labour of barristers: an exploration of emotional labour by status professionals. J Manag Stud. 2002;39(4):553–84.
Hochschild A. Emotion work, feeling rules and social structure. Am J Sociol. 1979;85:551–7.
Hochschild A. The managed heart: the commercialization of human feeling. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1983.
Hubbard G, Backett-Milburn K, Kemmer D. Working with emotions Issues for the researcher in fieldwork and teamwork. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2001;4(2):119–37.
International Federation of Social Workers. Ethics in social work: statement of principles. http://www.ifsw.org/. (2006).
Isenbarger L, Zembylas M. The emotional labour of caring in teaching. Teach Teach Educ. 2006;22(1):120–34.
Jafari A, Dunnett S, Hamilton K, Downey H. Exploring researcher vulnerability: contexts, complications, and conceptualisation. J Mark Manag. 2013;29(9–10):1182–200.
James N. Emotional labour: skill and work in the social regulation of feelings. Sociol Rev. 1989;37:15–42.
Johnson N. The role of self and emotion within qualitative sensitive research: a reflective account. ENQUIRE. 2009;4:23.
Johnson B, Clarke J. Collecting sensitive data: the impact on the researchers. Qual Health Res. 2003;13(3):421–34.
Kennedy F, Hicks B, Yarker J. Challenges and work experiences of oncology researchers. Psycho-Oncology. 2012;21:14.
Kenyon E, Hawker S. “Once would be enough”: some reflections on the issue of safety for lone researhers. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2000;2(4):313–27.
Kiyimba N, O’Reilly M. The risk of secondary traumatic stress in the qualitative transcription process: a research note. Qual Res. 2015;60:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794115577013.
Kiyimba N, O’Reilly M. An exploration of the possibility for secondary traumatic stress among transcriptionists: a grounded theory approach. Qual Res Psychol. 2016;13(1):92–108.
Lalor JG, Begley CM, Devane D. Exploring painful experiences: impact of emotional narratives on members of a qualitative research team. J Adv Nurs. 2006;56(6):607–16.
Larson EB, Yao X. Clinical empathy as emotional labor in the patient-physician relationship. JAMA. 2005;293(9):1100–6.
Lee RM. Dangerous fieldwork. Thousand Oaks: SAGE; 1995.
Lee R, Lee Y. Methodological research on “sensitive” Topics: a decade review. Bull Sociol Methodol. 2012;114(1):35–49.
Lee R, Renzetti C. The problems of researching sensitive topics. In: Renzetti CM, Lee RM, editors. Researching sensitive topics. Newbury Park: SAGE; 1993. p. 3–12.
Lee-Treweek G, Linkogle S, editors. Danger in the field: risk and ethics in social research. London: Routledge; 2000.
Liamputtong P. Researching the vulnerable: a guide to sensitive research methods. London: SAGE; 2007.
Lovatt M, Nanton V, Roberts J, Ingleton C, Noble B, Pitt E, Seers K, Munday D. The provision of emotional labour by health care assistants caring for dying cancer patients in the community: a qualitative study into the experiences of health care assistants and bereaved family carers. Int J Nurs Stud. 2015;52(1):271–9.
McCosker H, Barnard A, Gerber R. Understanding sensitive research: issues and strategies for meeting the safety needs for all participants. Forum Qual Soc Res. 2001;2(1):1.
Mckenzie SK, Li C, Jenkin G, Collings S. Ethical considerations in sensitive suicide research reliant on non-clinical researchers. Res Ethics. 2016; https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016116649996.
Mears A, Finlay W. Not just a paper doll: how models manage bodily capital and why they perform emotional labor. J Contemp Ethnogr. 2005;34(3):317–43.
Mitchell W, Irvine A. I’m okay, you’re okay?: reflections on the well-being and ethical requirements of researchers and research participants in conducting qualitative fieldwork interviews. Int J Qual Methods. 2008;7(4):31–44.
Moran-Ellis J. Close to home: the experience of researching child sexual abuse. In: Hester M, Kelly L, Radford J, editors. Women, violence and male power. Buckingham: Open University; 1996. p. 176–87.
Mulholland K. Gender, emotional labour and teamworking in a call centre. Pers Rev. 2002;31(3): 283–303.
National Health & Medical Research Council. National statement on ethical conduct in human research. Canberra: National Health and Medical Research Council and Australian Vice Chancellors Committee; 2007.
Noblet A. Building health promoting work settings: identifying the relationship between work characteristics and occupational stress in Australia. Health Promot Int. 2003;18(4):351–7.
Ogbonna E, Harris L. Work intensification and emotional labour among UK university lecturers: an exploratory study. Organ Stud. 2004;25(7):1185–203.
Parker N, O’Reilly M. “We are alone in the house”: a case study addressing researcher safety and risk. Qual Res Psychol. 2013;10(4):341–54.
Paterson BL, Gregory D, Thorne S. A protocol for researcher safety. Qual Health Res. 1999;9(2): 259–69.
Pisaniello SL, Winefield HR, Delfabbro PH. The influence of emotional labour and emotional work on the occupational health and wellbeing of South Australian hospital nurses. J Vocat Behav. 2012;80(3):579–91.
Renzetti C, Lee RM, editors. Researching sensitive topics. Newbury Park: SAGE; 1993.
Rowling L. Being in, being out, being with: affect and the role of the qualitative researcher in loss and grief research. Mortality. 1999;4(2):167–81.
Sampson H, Bloor M, Fincham B. A price worth paying? Sociology. 2008;42(5):919–33.
Sanders T. Controllable laughter: managing sex work through humour. Sociology. 2004;38(2): 273–91.
Schwartz MD, editor. Researching sexual violence against women: methodological and personal perspectives. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1997.
Sharma U, Black P. Look good, feel better: beauty therapy as emotional labour. Sociology. 2001;35(4):913–9.
Sherry E. The vulnerable researcher: facing the challenges of sensitive research. Qual Res J. 2013;13(3):278–88.
Social Research Association. A code of practice for the safety of social researchers. 2006. Available at http://www.the-sra.org.uk/documents/word/safety_code_of_practice.doc. Accessed 19 Sept 2007.
Stets JE, Turner JH. Handbook of the sociology of emotions. Dordrecht: Springer; 2014.
Van Maanen J. The smile factory work at Disneyland. In: Frost PJ, Louis LF, Lundberg CC, Martin J, editors. Reframing organizational culture. Newbury Park: SAGE; 1990. p. 58–76.
Warr D. Stories in the flesh and voices in the head: reflections on the context and impact of research with disadvantaged populations. Qual Health Res. 2004;14(4):578–87.
Wilkes L, Cummings J, Haigh C. Transcriptionist saturation: knowing too much about sensitive health and social data. J Adv Nurs. 2014; https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.12510.
Woodby L, Williams B, Wittich A, Burgio K. Expanding the notion of researcher distress: the cumulative effects of coding. Qual Health Res. 2011;21(6):830–8.
Wray N, Markovic M, Manderson L. “Researcher saturation”: the impact of data triangulation and intensive-research practices on the researcher and qualitative research process. Qual Health Res. 2007;17(10):1392–402.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this entry
Cite this entry
Dickson-Swift, V. (2019). Emotion and Sensitive Research. In: Liamputtong, P. (eds) Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5251-4_141
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5251-4_141
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-5250-7
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-5251-4
eBook Packages: Social SciencesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences