Abstract
In 2013 Western Sydney University began giving iPads to all new first-year undergraduate students. Teaching staff were also issued with iPads. This was the largest such initiative in the southern hemisphere. It was part of the University’s strategic plan for learning and teaching, integrated across several university support systems, including curriculum development, staff development and IT infrastructure. This chapter is an account of how these systems have begun to work together to support the use of mobile devices as an integral part of the university learning environment. Teaching staff have been provided with a range of training and support services to facilitate the use of iPads in teaching, as part of the Western Sydney University learning environment. There has also been substantial investment in infrastructure – such as campus Wi-Fi and learning spaces (both formal and informal) to support the use of mobile technologies on campus. The evidence for the interaction of the different aspects of mobile learning provision is drawn from student surveys, staff interviews and student focus groups, spanning the years 2013–2015. The analysis is a mixed method one, identifying large-scale quantitative patterns and using more detailed accounts of the participant experiences to interpret these patterns. The result is a context-specific map of how university support systems can grow together. This map may help other universities develop their own integrated and systemic support for mobile learning.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Achtenhagen, L., & Melin, L. (2003). Managing the homogeneity-heterogeneity duality. In A. M. Pettigrew, R. Whittington, L. Melin, C. Sanchez-Runde, F. A. J. van den Bosch, W. Ruigrok, & T. Numagami (Eds.), Innovative forms of organizing: International perspectives (Vol. 1, pp. 301–327). London/Thousand Oaks/New Delhi: Sage Publications.
Barnett, R. (2000). Realizing the University in an age of supercomplexity. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
Capra, F. (2002). The hidden connections (Vol. 1). London: HarperCollins.
Cilliers, P. (2001). Boundaries, hierarchies and networks in complex systems. International Journal of Innovation Management, 5(2), 135–147. x.
Dahlstrom, E., Brooks, D. C., Grajek, S., & Reeves, J. (2015). ECAR study of students and information technology, 2015. Louisville: EDUCAUSE Center for Analysis and Research.
Gosper, M., Malfroy, J., & McKenzie, J. (2013). Students’ experiences and expectations of technologies: An Australian study designed to inform design and development decisions. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(2), 268–282.
Johnson, G. M., & Cooke, A. (2016). An ecological model of student interaction in online learning environments. In L. Kyei-Blankson (Ed.), Handbook of research on strategic management of interaction, presence and participation in online courses. Hershey: IGI Global.
Ko, E. H. T., Chiu, D. K. W., Lo, P., & Ho, K. K. W. (2015). Comparative study on m-learning usage among LIS students from Hong Kong, Japan and Taiwan. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 41(5), 567–577.
Pei, L., Guinness, R., & Kaistinen, J. (2015). Cognitive phone for sensing human behaviour. In S. Yan (Ed.), Encyclopedia of mobile phone behaviour (Vol. III, pp. 1156–1168). Hershey: IGI Global.
Pettigrew, A. M., & Massini, S. (2003). Innovative forms of organizing: Trends in Europe, Japan and the USA in the 1990s. In A. M. Pettigrew, R. Whittington, L. Melin, C. Sanchez-Runde, F. A. J. van den Bosch, W. Ruigrok, & T. Numagami (Eds.), Innovative forms of organizing: International perspectives (Vol. 1, pp. 1–32; x). London/Thousand Oaks/New Delhi: Sage Publications.
Russell, C. (2009). A systemic framework for managing e-learning adoption in campus universities: Individual strategies in an institutional context. ALT-J Research in Learning Technology, 17(1), 3–19; 13.
Russell, C. (2014). Herding cats and measuring elephants: Implementing and evaluating an institutional blended and mobile learning strategy. Paper presented at the Rhetoric and Reality: Critical perspectives on educational technology. Proceedings ascilite Dunedin 2014, Dunedin.
Russell, C., Malfroy, J., Gosper, M., & McKenzie, J. (2014). Using research to inform learning technology practice and policy: A qualitative analysis of student perspectives. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 30(1), 1–15.
Sankey, M. (2014). Benchmarks for technology enhanced learning: Report on the refresh project 2014 and inter-institutional benchmarking summit. Canberra: ACODE.
Shergold, P., & Glover, B. (2014). Annual report 2013 Volume 1: The year in review. Sydney: Western Sydney University.
Shergold, P., & Glover, B. (2015). Securing success 2015–2020 strategic plan. Sydney: Western Sydney University.
Skillsoft. (2015). The State of Mobile Learning in Asia Pacific: How mobile is shaping cloud-based learning.
Whittington, R., & Pettigrew, A. M. (2003). Complementarities thinking. In A. Pettigrew, R. Whittington, L. Melin, C. Sanchez-Runde, F. A. J. van den Bosch, & T. Numagami (Eds.), Innovative forms of organizing (pp. 125–132). London: Sage.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Russell, C. (2017). Growing a Mobile Learning Ecology: A Systemic University-Wide Strategy. In: Murphy, A., Farley, H., Dyson, L., Jones, H. (eds) Mobile Learning in Higher Education in the Asia-Pacific Region. Education in the Asia-Pacific Region: Issues, Concerns and Prospects, vol 40. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4944-6_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4944-6_22
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-4943-9
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-4944-6
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)