Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Internet Plagiarism at the Fingertips? Legal Warning to Professionals and Future Professionals

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
New Ecology for Education — Communication X Learning

  • 780 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter examines the legal impact of alleged plagiarism in the Information Age on professionals and people who plan to become professionals. Through examples of litigations in Australia and a few other common-law jurisdictions, the current manuscript discusses plagiarism in general and particularly in the cyberspace, with a hope of arousing professionals’ and future professionals’ alertness to the possible legal risks of disqualifications arising from plagiarism allegedly committed at any point of time before and after they become professionals.

The Internet embraces all variations of the concept of plagiarism.

—Sutherland-Smith (2008, p. 34).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    [2013] EWHC 1379 (Admin) (Queen’s Bench Division (Administrative Court), UK).

  2. 2.

    [2010] VCAT 1927 (Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal, Australia).

  3. 3.

    [2006] QCA 152 (Court of Appeal of Queensland, Australia).

  4. 4.

    [2007] QSC 34 (Supreme Court of Queensland, Australia).

  5. 5.

    [2007] VSC 520 (Supreme Court of Victoria, Australia).

  6. 6.

    [2014] EWCA Civ 2246 (Court of Appeal, UK).

  7. 7.

    [2015] HKEC 748 (Court of Appeal, Hong Kong).

  8. 8.

    2013 BCCA 489 (British Columbia Court of Appeal, Canada).

References

  • ACCA. (2013). Rulebook 2013. Retrieved December 6, 2016 from http://www.accaglobal.com/content/dam/ACCA_Global/Members/Doc/rule/ACCA-rulebook-2013.pdf

  • Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights

    Google Scholar 

  • Alger, J. R. (2008). Legal issues for academic leaders. Effective Practices for Academic Leaders, 3(2), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, M. S., & Steneck, N. H. (2011). The problem of plagiarism. Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations, 29(1), 90–94. doi:10.1016/j.urolonc.2010.09.013

  • Bartlett, F. (2008). Student misconduct and admission to legal practice: New judicial approaches. Monash University Law Review, 34(2), 309–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basic Law of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People’s Republic of China

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, K. K., Behrendt, L. S., & Boothby, J. L. (2011). Instructor perceptions of plagiarism: Are we finding common ground? Teaching of Psychology, 38(1) 29–35. doi:10.1177/0098628310390851

  • Bergmann, L. S. (2009). Higher education administration ownership, collaboration, and publication: Connecting or separating the writing of administrators, faculty, and students? In C. P. Haviland & J. A. Mullin (Eds.), Who owns this text? Plagiarism, authorship, and disciplinary cultures (pp. 129–153). Logan, Utah: Utah State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works.

    Google Scholar 

  • Board of Architects Singapore. (2016). Registration requirements: General registration requirements for architectural practice in Singapore. Retrieved December 6, 2016 from http://www.boa.gov.sg/registration.html

  • Bradley, C. (2011). Plagiarism education and prevention: A subject-driven case-based approach. Oxford, UK: Chandos Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brimble, M., & Stevenson-Clarke, P. (2005). Perceptions of the prevalence and seriousness of academic dishonesty in Australian universities. Australian Educational Researcher, 32(3), 19–44. doi:10.1007/BF03216825

  • Buckeridge, J. S., & Watts, R. (2013). On ethics, the pursuit of knowledge, truth and status in the hallowed halls of academe. Integrative Zoology, 8(3), 223–231. doi:10.1111/j.1749-4877.2012.12007.x

  • Cambridge Advanced Learner’s Dictionary. (2003). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clegg, S., & Flint, A. (2006). More heat than light: Plagiarism in its appearing. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 27(3), 373–387. doi:10.1080/01425690600750585

  • CNN. (2003, May 11). New York Times: Reporter routinely faked articles: Probe alleges made-up quotes, plagiarism in at least 36 stories. Retrieved December 6, 2016 from http://edition.cnn.com/2003/US/Northeast/05/10/ny.times.reporter/

  • Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act.

    Google Scholar 

  • Constitution Act 1867 of Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Constitution of the United States.

    Google Scholar 

  • Copyright Act of the United States.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuddon, J. A. (2013). A dictionary of literary terms and literary theory (5th ed.). West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, G., & Garnett, K. (2010). Moral rights. London: Sweet & Maxwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, M. M., & Overfield, J. A. (2006). Plagiarism: Do students know what it is? Bioscience Education, 8(1), 1–15. doi:10.3108/beej.8.1

  • DeVoss, D., & Rosati, A. C. (2002). “It wasn’t me, was it?” Plagiarism and the web. Computers and Composition, 19(2), 191–203. doi:10.1016/S8755-4615(02)00112-3

  • Diogenes, M., Lunsford, A., & Otuteye, M. (2009). Open source: Computer science and the logic of ownership. In C. P. Haviland & J. A. Mullin (Eds.), Who owns this text? Plagiarism, authorship, and disciplinary cultures (pp. 20–48). Logan, Utah: Utah State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Divan, A., Bowman, M., & Seabourne, A. (2015). Reducing unintentional plagiarism amongst international students in the biological sciences: An embedded academic writing development programme. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 39(3), 358–378. doi:10.1080/0309877X.2013.858674

  • Donahue, C. (2008). When copying is not copying. In C. Eisner & M. Vicinus (Eds.), Originality, imitation, and plagiarism: Teaching writing in the digital age (pp. 90–103). Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donnelly, M., Ingalls, R., Morse, T. A., Post, J. C., & Stockdell-Giesler, A. M. (2013). Part I definitions of plagiarism: Distinctions, laws, and rules. In M. Donnelly, R. Ingalls, T. A. Morse, J. C. Post, & A. M. Stockdell-Giesler (Eds.), Critical conversations about plagiarism (pp. 3–5). Anderson, South Carolina: Parlor Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisner, C., & Vicinus, M. (2008). Introduction—Originality, imitation, and plagiarism: Teaching writing in the age of the Internet. In C. Eisner & M. Vicinus (Eds.), Originality, imitation, and plagiarism: Teaching writing in the digital age (pp. 1–9). Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ercegovac, Z., & Richardson, J. V., Jr. (2004). Academic dishonesty, plagiarism included, in the digital age: A literature review. College & Research Libraries, 65(4), 301–318. doi:10.5860/crl.65.4.301

  • Eret, E., & Ok, A. (2014). Internet plagiarism in higher education: Tendencies, triggering factors and reasons among teacher candidates. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(8), 1002–1016. doi:10.1080/02602938.2014.880776

  • Fung, D. R. (1996). Foundation for the survival of the rule of law in Hong Kong. UCLA Journal of International Law and Foreign Affairs, 1, 283–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerhardt, D., & Wessel, M. (2010). Fair use and fairness on campus. North Carolina Journal of Law & Technology, 11, 2–71. (UNC Legal Studies Research Paper No. 1594934).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh, S. (2007). How to build a commons: Is intellectual property constrictive, facilitating, or irrelevant? In C. Hess & E. Ostrom (Eds.), Understanding knowledge as a commons: From theory to practice (pp. 209–245). Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glendinning, I. (2014). Responses to student plagiarism in higher education across Europe. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 10(1), 4–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gov.uk. (2016). Aircraft maintenance engineering licence. Retrieved December 6, 2016 from https://www.gov.uk/aircraft-maintenance-engineering-licence

  • Granitz, N., & Loewy, D. (2007). Applying ethical theories: Interpreting and responding to student plagiarism. Journal of Business Ethics, 72(3), 293–306. doi:10.1007/s10551-006-9171-9

  • Harms, D. (2006). Plagiarism, publishing, and the academy. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 38(1), 1–13. doi:10.1353/scp.2007.0002

  • Harris, L. E. (2014). Canadian copyright law (4th ed.). Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawley, C. S. (1984). The thieves of academe: Plagiarism in the university system. Improving College and University Teaching, 32(1), 35–39. doi:10.1080/00193089.1984.10533838

  • Heckler, N. C., & Forde, D. R. (2015). The role of cultural values in plagiarism in higher education. Journal of Academic Ethics, 13(1), 61–75. doi:10.1007/s10805-014-9221-3

  • Hornby, A. S. (1995). Oxford advanced learner’s dictionary of current English (5th ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, R. M. (1995). Plagiarisms, authorships, and the academic death penalty. College English, 57(7), 788–806.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard, R. M. (1999). Standing in the shadow of giants: Plagiarists, authors, collaborators. Stamford, Connecticut: Ablex Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, R. M. (2002). Don’t police plagiarism: Just TEACH. The Education Digest, 67(5), 46–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johannesen, R. L. (1995). The ethics of plagiarism reconsidered: The oratory of Martin Luther King, Jr. The Southern Communication Journal, 60(3), 185–194. doi:10.1080/10417949509372978

  • Josephson Institute of Ethics. (2006). 2006 Josephson Institute report card on the ethics of American youth: Part one—integrity summary of data. Retrieved December 6, 2016 from http://www.csun.edu/~kdm78513/coursework/625/assignments/documents/ethicreportcard.pdf

  • Jowitt, A. (2007). The impact of plagiarism on admission to the bar: Re Liveri [2006] QCA 152. Journal of South Pacific Law, 11(2), 213–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, K. (2006, September 10). Plagiarism questions plague Ill. University alumni, faculty group examines top administrators’ speeches and web pages. The Washington Post. Retrieved December 6, 2016 from https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/2006/09/10/plagiarism-questions-plague-ill-university-span-classbankheadalumni-faculty-group-examines-top-administrators-speeches-and-web-pagesspan/7f13c048-4f5f-40a1-9834-369edd7bd4d4/

  • Kwong, T., Ng, H.-M., Mark, K.-P., & Wong, E. (2010). Students’ and faculty’s perception of academic integrity in Hong Kong. Campus-Wide Information Systems, 27(5), 341–355. doi:10.1108/10650741011087766

  • Leight, D. (1999). Plagiarism as a metaphor. In L. Buranen & A. M. Roy (Eds.), Perspectives on plagiarism and intellectual property in a postmodern world (pp. 221–229). Albany, New York: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leung, C. (2015, November 15). Lingnan financial chief quits over credentials row. South China Morning Post. Retrieved December 6, 2016 from http://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/education-community/article/1878896/lingnan-financial-chief-quits-over-credentials

  • Lifts and Escalators Ordinance (Cap 618) of Hong Kong

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahmood, Z. (2009). Students’ understanding of plagiarism and collusion and recommendations for academics. WSEAS Transactions on Information Science and Applications, 8(6), 1349–1358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malloch, A. E. (1976). A dialogue on plagiarism. College English, 38(2), 165–174. doi:10.2307/376341

  • Marsh, B. (2007). Plagiarism: Alchemy and remedy in higher education. Albany, New York: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maruca, L. (2006). Plagiarism and its (disciplinary) discontents: Towards and interdisciplinary theory and pedagogy. Issues in Integrative Studies, 21, 74–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mundava, M., & Chaudhuri, J. (2007). Understanding plagiarism: The role of librarians at the University of Tennessee in assisting students to practice fair use of information. College & Research Libraries News, 68(3), 170–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonis, S., & Swift, C. O. (2001). An examination of the relationship between academic dishonesty and workplace dishonesty: A multicampus investigation. Journal of Education for Business, 77(2), 69–77. doi:10.1080/08832320109599052

  • Office of Science and Technology Policy of the United States. (2000, December 6). Executive office of the president; federal policy on research misconduct; preamble for research misconduct policy. Federal Register, 65(235), 76260–76264. Retrieved December 6, 2016 from https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2000-12-06/pdf/00-30852.pdf

  • Office of the Independent Adjudicator. (2014). Plagiarism and academic misconduct—September 2014. Retrieved December 6, 2016 from http://www.oiahe.org.uk/providers-and-good-practice/public-interest-cases/plagiarism-and-academic-misconduct—September-2014.aspx

  • Oliphant, T. (2002). Cyber-plagiarism: Plagiarism in a digital world. Feliciter, 48(2), 78–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Onge, K. R. St. (1988). The melancholy anatomy of plagiarism. Lanham, Maryland: University Press of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pandey, N. (2016, June 26). Thesis cheats beware! Academic plagiarism being made legal offence. The Hindustan Times. Retrieved December 6, 2016 from http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/thesis-cheats-beware-academic-plagiarism-being-made-legal-offence/story-kQZM2sP9KY1w942ly1xHiP.html

  • Park, C. (2003). In other (People’s) words: Plagiarism by university students—literature and lessons. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 28(5), 471–488. doi:10.1080/02602930301677

  • Parrish, D. (1995). Scientific misconduct and the plagiarism cases. Journal of College and University Law, 1994–95(3), 517–554.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pecorari, D. (2003). Good and original: Plagiarism and patchwriting in academic second-language writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12(4), 317–345. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2003.08.004

  • Pecorari, D. (2013). Teaching to avoid plagiarism: How to promote good source use. Maidenhead, England: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pincus, H. S., & Schmelkin, L. P. (2003). Faculty perceptions of academic dishonesty. The Journal of Higher Education, 74(2), 196–209. doi:10.1353/jhe.2003.0017

  • Ramzan, M., Munir, M. A., Siddique, N., & Asif, M. (2012). Awareness about plagiarism amongst university students in Pakistan. Higher Education, 64(1), 73–84. doi:10.1007/s10734-011-9481-4

  • Randall, M. (2001). Pragmatic plagiarism: Authorship, profit, and power. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rieder, R. (2003). The Jayson Blair affair: Can the New York Times learn important lessons from its plagiarism/fabrication scandal? American Journalism Review, 25(5), 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reyman, J. (2013). Plagiarism vs. copyright law: Is all copying theft? In M. Donnelly, R. Ingalls, T. A. Morse, J. C. Post, & A. M. Stockdell-Giesler (Eds.), Critical conversations about plagiarism (pp. 22–35). Anderson, South Carolina: Parlor Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, D., & Jacobs, B. (2016, July 19). Melania Trump plagiarism scandal threatens to overshadow nomination. The Guardian. Retrieved December 6, 2016 from https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/jul/19/melania-trump-plagiarism-scandal-michelle-obama

  • Rodriguez, L. F. (2004). Read the fine print: Legal issues related to student plagiarism. In V. Bowman (Ed.), The plagiarism plague: A resource guide and CD-ROM tutorial for educators and librarians (pp. 127–142). New York, NY: Neal-Schuman Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadeghi, R. (2016). The attitude of scholars has not changed towards plagiarism since the medieval period: Definition of plagiarism according to Shams-e-Qays, thirteenth-century Persian literary scientist. Research Ethics, published online, pp. 1–3. doi:10.1177/1747016116654065

  • Selwyn, N. (2008). ‘Not necessarily a bad thing …’: A study of online plagiarism amongst undergraduate students. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(5), 465–479. doi:10.1080/02602930701563104

  • Sinclair, J., Hanks, P., Fox, G., Moon, R., & Stock, P. (Eds.). (1987). Collins COBUILD English language dictionary. London: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smedley, A., Crawford, T., & Cloete, L. (2015). An intervention aimed at reducing plagiarism in undergraduate nursing students. Nurse Education in Practice, 15(3), 168–173. doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2014.12.003

  • Snider, J. H. (2013). Think tanks’ dirty little secret: Power, public policy, and plagiarism (Edmond J. Safra Working Papers, No. 17). Retrieved December 6, 2016 from https://ssrn.com/abstract=2307250

  • Stearns, L. (1992). Copy wrong: Plagiarism, process, property, and the law. California Law Review, 80(2), 513–553. doi:10.15779/Z383H9G

  • Stebelman, S. (1998). Cybercheating: Dishonesty goes digital: web makes plagiarism easier but offers librarians new methods of detection. American Libraries, 29(8), 48–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephens, J. M., Young, M. F., & Calabrese, T. (2007). Does moral judgment go offline when students are online? A comparative analysis of undergraduates’ beliefs and behaviors related to conventional and digital cheating. Ethics & Behavior, 17(3), 233–254. doi:10.1080/10508420701519197

  • Sutherland-Smith, W. (2008). Plagiarism, the Internet, and student learning: Improving academic integrity. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland-Smith, W. (2010). Retribution, deterrence and reform: The dilemmas of plagiarism management in universities. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 32(1), 5–16. doi:10.1080/13600800903440519

  • Tayraukham, S. (2009). Academic ethics in research methodology. The Social Sciences, 4(6), 573–577.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Harvard University. (2016). What constitutes plagiarism? Retrieved December 6, 2016 from http://isites.harvard.edu/icb/icb.do?keyword=k70847&pageid=icb.page342054

  • The University of Oxford. (No date). Academic good practice—A practical guide. Retrieved December 6, 2016 from https://www.ox.ac.uk/sites/files/oxford/field/field_document/Academic%20good%20practice%20a%20practical%20guide.pdf

  • Thomson Reuters. (2016). Thomson Reuters Westlaw. Retrieved December 6, 2016 from http://legalsolutions.thomsonreuters.com/law-products/westlaw-legal-research/

  • Veterinarians Act 2005 of New Zealand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vishwakarma, P., & Mukherjee, B. (2014). Knowing protection of intellect contents in digital era. In N. K. Patra, B. Kumar, & A. K. Pani (Eds.), Progressive trends in electronic resource management in libraries (pp. 147–165). Hershey, Pennsylvania: IGI Global.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wardle, J. (2013). Plagiarism and registered health professionals: Navigating the borderlands between scholarly and professional misconduct. Journal of Law and Medicine, 21(2), 399–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, W., & Byrne, J. (2009). Theory and practice: Some ethical concerns about counselling research. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 22(3), 309–318. doi:10.1080/09515070903285668

  • WIPO Copyright Treaty.

    Google Scholar 

  • WIPO Performances and Phonograms Treaty.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Intellectual Property Organization. (No date). WIPO Copyright Treaty (WCT). Retrieved December 6, 2016 from http://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/ip/wct/

  • World Trade Organization. (2016). Overview: The TRIPS Agreement. Retrieved December 6, 2016 from https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/trips_e/intel2_e.htm

Court Cases

  • AQJ v University of New South Wales [2013] NSWADT 306 (New South Wales Administrative Decisions Tribunal, Australia).

    Google Scholar 

  • Carleton v Australian Broadcasting Corporation [2002] ACTSC 127 (Supreme Court of the ACT, Australia).

    Google Scholar 

  • Carolan v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd (No 6) [2016] NSWSC 1091 (Supreme Court of New South Wales, Australia).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dr Fazal Hussain v General Medical Council [2014] EWCA Civ 2246 (Court of Appeal, UK).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dr Tse Kit Ming v Dental Council of Hong Kong [2015] HKEC 748 (Court of Appeal, Hong Kong).

    Google Scholar 

  • Madden v Seafolly Pty Ltd [2014] FCAFC 30 (Federal Court of Australia).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohan v Law Society of British Columbia 2013 BCCA 489 (British Columbia Court of Appeal, Canada).

    Google Scholar 

  • Psychologists Registration Board (Vic) v Glamcevski [2010] VCAT 1927 (Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal, Australia).

    Google Scholar 

  • R (on the application of Mustafa) v Office for the Independent Adjudicator for Higher Education [2013] EWHC 1379 (Admin) (Queen’s Bench Division (Administrative Court), UK).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rana v Deakin University [2012] FMCA 575 (Federal Magistrates Court of Australia).

    Google Scholar 

  • Re Humzy-Hancock [2007] QSC 34 (Supreme Court of Queensland, Australia).

    Google Scholar 

  • Re Legal Profession Act 2004 [2007] VSC 520 (Supreme Court of Victoria, Australia).

    Google Scholar 

  • Re Liveri [2006] QCA 152 (Court of Appeal of Queesland, Australia).

    Google Scholar 

  • Seafolly Pty Ltd v Madden [2012] FCA 1346 (Federal Court of Australia).

    Google Scholar 

  • SZKMP v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2007] FCA 1646 (Federal Court of Australia).

    Google Scholar 

  • SZLYI v Minister for Immigration [2008] FMCA 1169 (Federal Magistrates Court of Australia).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China

    Kar-wai Tong

Authors
  1. Kar-wai Tong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kar-wai Tong .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. HKAECT, Hong Kong, Hong Kong

    Will W.K. Ma

  2. HKAECT, Hong Kong, Hong Kong

    Chi-Keung Chan

  3. HKAECT, Hong Kong, Hong Kong

    Kar-wai Tong

  4. HKAECT, Hong Kong, Hong Kong

    Heidi Fung

  5. HKAECT, Hong Kong, Hong Kong

    Cheuk Wai Rose Fong

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Tong, Kw. (2017). Internet Plagiarism at the Fingertips? Legal Warning to Professionals and Future Professionals. In: Ma, W., Chan, CK., Tong, Kw., Fung, H., Fong, C. (eds) New Ecology for Education — Communication X Learning. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4346-8_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4346-8_23

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-4345-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-4346-8

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation