Abstract
Do different representations of space evoke the same response in viewers? This paper reports on a pilot study exploring designers’ cognitive load as they view different digital representation of spaces to determine the effect of the representations. The results reported in this paper are from a group of year 3 and year 4 architecture students from Harbin Institute of Technology in China who participated in the experiment. The two representational modalities in this study that participants were asked to view were a computer-generated hidden-line perspective and a digital photograph of the same space. Their physiological data were recorded by eye-tracking equipment, including participants’ eye gaze trace location and pupil size. The same seven Area of Interests (AOI) were defined in each of the two representations. Results show statistically significant cognitive load change when the AOI focused on changes. The cognitive loads for the two representations were found not to be significantly different.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Schön, D., Wiggins, G.: Kinds of seeing and their functions in designing. Des. Stud. 13(2), 135–156 (1992)
Kaufman, L., Richard, W.: Spontaneous fixation tendencies for visual forms. Percept. Psychophys. 585–588 (1969)
Weber, R., Choi, Y., Stark, L.: The impact of formal properties on eye movement during the perception of architecture. J. Archit. Plan. Res. 19(1), 57–68 (2002)
Eastman, C.M.: BIM Handbook: A Guide to Building Information Modeling for Owners, Managers, Designers, Engineers and Contractors. Wiley (2008)
Wang, W., et al.: Creation dependencies of evolutionary artefact and design process knowledge. J. Eng. Des. 24(9), 681–710 (2013)
Morrison, A., et al.: Collaborative use of mobile augmented reality with paper maps. Comput. Graphics 35(4), 789–799 (2011)
Oliva, A., Park, S., Konkle, T.: Representing, perceiving and remembering the shape of visual space.. In: Harris, L.R., Jenkin, M. (eds.) Vision in 3D Environments, pp. 308–339. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2011)
Oliva, A., Torralba, A.: Modeling the shape of the scene: a holistic representation of the spatial envelope. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 42(3), 145–175 (2001)
Oliva, A., Torralba, A.: Building the gist of a scene: the role of global image features in recognition. Prog. Brain Res. 15523–15536 (2006)
Buettner, R.: Cognitive workload of humans using artificial intelligence systems: towards objective measurement applying eye-tracking technology. In: Timm, I.J., Thimm, M. (eds.) KI 2013: Advances in Artificial Intelligence. KI 2013: 36th German Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 37–48. Springer, Koblenz, Germany (2013)
Granholm, E., et al.: Pupillary responses index cognitive resource limitations. Psychophysiology 33(4), 457–461 (1996)
Hess, E.H., Polt, J.M.: Pupil size in relation to mental activity during simple problem-solving. Science 143(3611), 1190–1192 (1964)
Just, M.A., Carpenter, P.A.: The intensity dimension of thought: pupillometric indices of sentence processing. Can. J. Exp. Psychol. 47(2), 310–339 (1993)
Holmqvist, K., et al.: Eye Tracking: A Comprehensive Guide to Methods and Measures. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2011)
Buswell: How people look at pictures: A study of the psychology of perception in art. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1935)
Gould, D., Peeples, R.: Eye movements during visual search and discrimination of meaningless symbol and object patterns. J. Exp. Psychol. 8551–8555 (1970)
Kuchinke, L. et al.: The processing and integration of map elements during a recognition memory task is mirrored in eye-movement patterns. J. Environ. Psychol. 47213–47222 (2016)
Valtchanov, D., Ellard, C.G.: Cognitive and affective responses to natural scenes: effects of low level visual properties on preference, cognitive load and eye-movements. J. Environ. Psychol. 43184–43195 (2015)
Torralba, A., et al.: Contextual guidance of eye movements and attention in real-world scenes: the role of global features in object search. Psychol. Rev. 113(4), 766–786 (2006)
Arnheim, R.: The Power of the Center. University of California Press, Berkeley (1985)
Gero, J., Shields, J., Yu, R.: How veridical are computer generated representations?—the effect of presentation modality on physiological response. In: The 21st International Conference on Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia (CAADRIA 2016), pp. 861–870 (2016)
Acknowledgements
This research was carried out under UNCC’s IRB Approval for Protocol 14-03-17.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Yu, R., Gero, J. (2017). Exploring Designers’ Cognitive Load When Viewing Different Digital Representations of Spaces: A Pilot Study. In: Chakrabarti, A., Chakrabarti, D. (eds) Research into Design for Communities, Volume 1. ICoRD 2017. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 65. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3518-0_40
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3518-0_40
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-3517-3
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-3518-0
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)