Abstract
Choosing the right design alternative requires consideration of various attributes, such as functionality, cost, ease of manufacture, etc. In the early stages of design there usually isn’t enough information to make assessments of all these attributes. Often times, designers base these early decisions on qualitative assessments of indicators such as complexity, flexibility, or modularity, in place of the attributes of interest. Various methods have been proposed in literature to quantitatively calculate such indicators. However, the methods need design information to be provided in non-standard formats leading to errors, inconsistencies, and subjectivity in evaluation. This paper argues the benefits of using a standard modeling language such as SysML to capture design information and extract consistent information for calculating these indicators. Using alternate hybrid vehicle architectures as an example, the paper presents a framework to calculate two such indicators, viz. modularity and complexity.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Simon, H.A.: The architecture of complexity. Proc. Am. Philos. Soc. 106(6), 467–482 (1962)
Browning, T.R.: Applying the design structure matrix to system decomposition and integration problems: a review and new directions. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage. 48(3), 292–306 (2001)
Guo, F., Gershenson, J.K.: A comparison of modular product design methods on improvement and iteration. In: Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering and Technical Conferences, Salt Lake City, UT (2004)
Kinnunen, M.J.: Complexity measures for system architecture models, Masters Thesis, System Design and Management Program, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, MA, USA (2006)
OMG systems modeling language: the official OMG SysML site [Online]. http://www.omgsysml.org/. Accessed 15 April 2016
Sosa, M.E., Eppinger, S.D., Rowles, C.M.: Identifying modular and integrative systems and their impact on design team interactions. ASME J. Mech. Des. 125, 240–252 (2003)
Hölttä-Otto, K., de Weck, O.: Degree of modularity in engineering systems and products with technical and business constraints. Concurr. Eng. 15(2), 113–126 (2007)
Edmonds, B.: Syntactic Measures of complexity, Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Philosophy, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK (1999)
Lankford, J.: Measuring system and software architecture complexity. In: Proceedings of Aerospace Conference (2003)
Dori, D.: Object-Process Methodology: A Holistic Systems Paradigm, 1st edn. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg (2002)
Meyer, M., Lehnerd, A.: The Power of Product Platforms, Simon and Schuster (1997)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Joshi, N. (2017). Evaluating Modularity and Complexity of Alternate Product Architectures. In: Chakrabarti, A., Chakrabarti, D. (eds) Research into Design for Communities, Volume 1. ICoRD 2017. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 65. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3518-0_33
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3518-0_33
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-3517-3
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-3518-0
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)