Abstract
A user interface is one an essential component that determines the efficacy of computer software. Therefore, evaluating and improving a user interface are crucial aspects of the software development process. User interfaces have been improved through various methods, including user testing and heuristic approaches. However, these techniques cannot be applied practically because the data provided by them may contain subjective aspects and do not reveal the developer’s demands. Therefore, to develop practical methods required in this field, we interviewed the developers on site to understand their needs. With this information, we developed a technique and conducted an experiment. In the process, we successfully analysed and illustrated the problems in a user interface by using flow line analysis techniques to obtain a user’s software-usage history. Finally, by applying the technique to experimental software interface and interviewing the developers, we verified that the new method provided the necessary information.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Allen, L., et al.: Looking for landmarks: the role of expert review and bibliometric analysis in evaluating scientific publication outputs. PloS ONE 4(6) (2009)
Savage, P.: User interface evaluation in an iterative design process: a comparison of three techniques. In: Conference Companion on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM (1996)
Korhonen, H., Janne P., Hannamari, S.: Expert review method in game evaluations: comparison of two playability heuristic sets. In: Proceedings of the 13th International MindTrek Conference: Everyday Life in the Ubiquitous Era. ACM (2009)
Väänänen-Vainio-Mattila, K., Minna W.: Developing an expert evaluation method for user experience of cross-platform web services. In: Proceedings of the 13th International MindTrek Conference: Everyday Life in the Ubiquitous Era. ACM (2009)
Nielsen, J.: Usability Engineering. Academic Press (1993)
Tidwell, J.: Designing Interfaces, 2nd ed. O’Reilly & Associates, Inc. (2010)
Nielsen, J.: Usability inspection methods. In: Proceedings of the CHI ‘94 Conference Companion on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 413–414 (1994)
Daniel, F., et al.: Understanding ui integration: a survey of problems, technologies, and opportunities. IEEE Internet Comput. 11(3), 59–66 (2007)
Burman, M.H.: New results in flow line analysis. Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1995)
Artmann, B., et al.: Reflective physical prototyping through integrated design, test, and analysis. In: Proceedings of the 19th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. ACM (2006)
Jovanovic, N., Christopher K., Engin K.: Pixy: a static analysis tool for detecting web application vulnerabilities. In: 2006 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (S&P’06). IEEE (2006)
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank many people who offered their help during our study. We are very grateful to them.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Kadomatsu, S., Nagai, Y. (2017). Study on User-Interface Problem-Finding Based on Flow-Line Analysis. In: Chakrabarti, A., Chakrabarti, D. (eds) Research into Design for Communities, Volume 1. ICoRD 2017. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 65. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3518-0_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3518-0_20
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-3517-3
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-3518-0
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)