Abstract
Anomaly detection is very sensitive for the data because, the feature vector selection is a very influential aspect in the anomaly detection rate and performance of the system. In this paper, we are trying to revise the dataset based on the rough genetic approach. This method improves the quality of the dataset based on the selection of valid input records to enhance the anomaly detection rate. We used rough sets for pre-processing the data and dimensionality reductions. Genetic algorithm is used to select proper feature vectors based on the fitness. The fusion of the soft computing techniques improves the data quality and reduces dimensionality. Empirical results prove that it improves detection rate as well as detection speed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Lee W and Stolfo S., “Data Mining techniques for intrusion detection”, In: Proc. of the 7th USENIX security symposium, San Antonio, TX, 1998.
L. Wenke, S. J. Stolfo, and K. W. Mok, “ A data mining framework for building intrusion detection models:, in proc. IEEE Sump. Security Privacy, 1999, pp. 120–132.
Denning D. (1987) “An Intrusion-Detection Model,” IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, Vol. SE-13, No. 2, pp. 222–232.
The Royal Road for Genetic Algorithms: Fitness Landscapes and GA Performance”, in: Francisco J. Varela, Paul Bourgine, editors. Toward a Practice of Autonomous Systems: proceedings of the first European conference on Artificial Life (1992). MIT Press.
Pawlak Z: Rough sets Present state and the future. Foundations of computing and Decision sciences 18, 157–163 (1993).
Pawlak Z: Rough Sets and Intelligent Data Analysis, Information Sciences, 2002, 147:1–12.
Pawlak Z, Rough Sets, International Journal of Computer and Information Sciences, vol. 11, pp. 341–256, 1982.
Boussouf M (1998) A Hybrid Approach to Feature Selection. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 1510:231–238.
Jan G. Bazan, Marcin Szczuka, “The rough set exploration system (2005)” TRANSACTIONS ON ROUGH SETS III, Springer.
Tavallaee. M, Bagheri, E.; Wei Lu; Ghorbani, A.A., “A detailed analysis of the KDD CUP 99 data set,” Computational Intelligence for Security and Defence Applications, 2009. CISDA 2009. IEEE Symposium on, vol., no., pp. 1,6, 8–10 July 2009.
John R. Koza. Genetic Programming. MIT Press, 1992.
Man Leung Wong, Kwong Sak Leung, Data Mining Using Grammar based Genetic Programming and Applications, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000.
D.E.Goldberg, Genetic Algorithm in Search Optimization and Machine Learning. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley, 1989.
W. Lu and I. Traore, “Detecting new forms of network intrusion using genetic programming”, Computational Intelligence, Vol. 20, no 3, pp. 474–494, 2004.
H. Iba, “ Bagging, boosting and bloating in genetic programming”, in Proc. Genetic Evol. Comput. Conf., W. Banzhaf et al., Eds., 1999, pp. 1053–1060.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this paper
Cite this paper
Ravinder Reddy, R., Ramadevi, Y., Sunitha, K.V.N. (2016). Data Fusion Approach for Enhanced Anomaly Detection. In: Saini, H., Sayal, R., Rawat, S. (eds) Innovations in Computer Science and Engineering. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 413. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0419-3_33
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0419-3_33
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-0417-9
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-0419-3
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)