Skip to main content

From Research Technique to Classroom Activity

Adapting Elicited Imitation as a Grammar-for-Speaking Task

  • Chapter
  • 1866 Accesses

Part of the book series: Advances in Creativity and Giftedness ((ACAG))

Abstract

Among the many techniques available for researchers in studying oral language production, elicited imitation (EI) stands out due to its ease of use, reliability, and versatility. The technique consists of a second language (L2) learner who simply listens to a sentence, typically 8–15 words in length, and then repeats verbatim what he or she has just heard.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bly-Vroman, R., & Chaudron, C. (1994). Elicited imitation as a measure of second language competence. In E. Tarnone, S. Gass, & A. Cohen (Eds.), Research methodology in second language acquisition (pp. 245–261). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calderon, A. M. (2013). The effects of l2 learner proficiency on depth of processing, levels of awareness, and intake. In J. M. Bergsleithner, S. M. Frota, & J. Yoshioka (Eds.), Noticing and second language acquisition: Studies in honor of Richard Schmidt (pp. 103–121). Honolulu, HI: National Foreign Language Resource Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erlam, R. (2009). The elicited imitation test as a measure of implicit knowledge. In R. Ellis, S. Loewen, R. Erlam, J. Philip, & H. Reiders (Eds.), Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning, testing, and teaching (pp. 65–367). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, L., Suzuki, W., & Tomita, Y. (2007). Elicited imitation in second language acquisition research. Canadian Modern Language Review, 64(1), 215–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsen-Freeman, D. (2009). Teaching and testing grammar. In M. H. Long & C. J. Doughty (Eds.), Handbook of language teaching (pp. 518–542). Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Poehner, M. (2008). Dynamic assessment: A Vygotskian approach to understanding and promoting second language development. Berlin: Springer Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Poehner, M., & Lantolf, J. (2013). Bringing the ZPD into the equation: Capturing L2 development during computerized dynamic assessment (C-DA). Language Testing Research, 17(3), 323–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Compernolle, R. A., & Zhang, H. (2014). Dynamic assessment of elicited imitation: A case analysis of an advanced L2 English speaker. Language Testing, 31(4), 395–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vinther, T. (2002). Elicited imitation: A brief overview. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 12, 54–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Busch, M. (2017). From Research Technique to Classroom Activity. In: Cummings, J.B., Blatherwick, M.L. (eds) Creative Dimensions of Teaching and Learning in the 21st Century. Advances in Creativity and Giftedness. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6351-047-9_33

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6351-047-9_33

  • Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-6351-047-9

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics