Abstract
Over the past 25 years or so, global trends such as site-based management, decentralization, and, more recently, accountability, have brought increasing attention to the school leadership sector. Previously, the focus of national improvement efforts and the interests of international development were located in the teaching sector and/or the structural aspects of schooling (i.e. student enrollments, provision of books, etc.).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ball, S. (2003). The teacher’s soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Education Policy, 18(2), 215-228.
Barrera-Osorio, F., Fasih, T., Patrinos, H. A., & Santibáñez, L. (2009). Decentralized decision-making in schools: The theory and evidence on school-based management. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
Brundrett, M., & Crawford, M. (Eds.). (2008). Developing school leaders: An international perspective. New York, NY: Routledge.
Brundrett, M., & Dering, A. (2006). The rise of leadership development programmes: A global phenomenon and a complex web. School Leadership & Management, 26(2), 89-92.
Bush, T. (1998). The national professional qualification for headship: The key to effective school leadership. School Leadership & Management, 18(3), 321-333.
Carney, S. (2009). Negotiating policy in an age of globalization: Exploring educational “policyscapes” in Denmark, Nepal and China. Comparative Education Review, 53(1), 63-88.
Dimmock, C., & Walker, A. (2000). Globalisation and societal culture: redefining schooling and school leadership in the twenty-first century. Compare, 30(3), 303-312.
Elmore, R. (2000). Building a new structure for school leadership. New York, NY: The Albert Shanker Institute.
Foucault, M. (1982). The subject and the power. In H. Dreyfus & P. Rabinow (Eds.), Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics (pp. 208-226). Brighton: Harvester.
Foucault, M. (1988). Technologies of the self. In L. H. Martin, H. Gutman, & P. H. Hutton (Eds.), Technologies of the self (pp. 16-49). London: Travistock.
Fullan, M. (2004). Leadership and sustainability: System thinkers in action. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Fusarelli, L.D. & Smith, L. (1999). Improving urban schools VIA leadership: Preparing administrators for the millennium. Journal of School Leadership, 9(6), 534-551.
Hallinger, P. (2005). Instructional leadership and the school principal: A passing fancy that refuses to fade away. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 4, 221-239.
Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. (1996). Reassessing the principal’s role in school effectiveness: A review of empirical research, 1980-1995. Educational Administration Quarterly, 32(1), 5-44.
Hamre, B. (2013). Optimization as a dispositive in the production of differences in Denmark schools. European Education, 45(4), 7-25.
Hargreaves, A., & Fink, (2004). The seven principles of effective leadership. Leading in Tough Times, 61(7), 8-13.
Kouzes, J. M., Posner, B. Z., & Peters, T. (2002). The leadership challenge. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Krejsler, J., Kofod, K., & Moos, L. (2009). Social technologies in comprehensive schooling. Nordic Studies in Education, 29, 73-77.
Leithwood, K., & Day, C. (2007). Starting with what we know. In C. Day & K. Liethwood (Eds.), Successful principal leadership in times of change: An international perspective (pp. 189-203). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
Leithwood, K., & Riehl, C. (2003). What we know about successful school leadership. United Kingdom: National College for School Leadership.
Levine, A., (2005). Educating school leaders. The Education Schools Project. Retrieved from http://www.edschools.org/pdf/Final313.pdf
Magno, C. (2013). Comparative perspectives on international school leadership: Policy, preparation and practice. New York: Routledge, Inc.
Martins, C. (2013). The arts in education as police technologies: Governing the child’s soul. European Education, 45(3), 67-84.
Ochs, K., & Phillips, D. (2004). Processes of educational borrowing in historical context. In K. Ochs & D. Phillips (Eds.), Educational policy borrowing: Historical perspectives (pp. 7-23). Oxford: Symposium Books.
Oplatka, I. (2004). The principalship in developing countries: Context, characteristics and reality. Comparative Education, 40(3), 427-448.
Petersson, K., Popkewitz, T., Olsson, U., & Krejsler, J. (2013). Guest editors’ introduction: Engaging in Foucault’s governmentality and styles of reasoning. European Education, 45(3), 4-15.
Ritzer, G. (2000). The McDonalization of society: New century edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
Rose, N. (1999). Powers of freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Said, E. (1978). Orientalism. New York, NY: Random House, Inc.
Steiner-Khamsi, G. (Ed.). (2004). The global politics of educational borrowing and lending. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Walker, A., & Dimmock, C. (2000). Mapping the way ahead: Leading educational leadership into the globalised world. School Leadership & Management, 20(2), 227-233.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Sense Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Magno, C. (2015). Locating Governmentality in the Spread of Educational Leadership. In: Kotthoff, HG., Klerides, E. (eds) Governing Educational Spaces. CESE. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-265-3_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-265-3_4
Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam
Online ISBN: 978-94-6300-265-3
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)