Abstract
This chapter focuses on the development of some selected cities in the Czech Republic during the last 40 years. This time period has two halves. The first one is before 1990 when the country was part of Czechoslovakia, one of the communist countries; the second period covers a democratic regime after 1990. Land use development of dozens of cities was analyzed on the base of basic land use classes. These classes allow in an objective way to compare all the cities. The development is shown through values of 14 attributes for cities grouped into 3 categories – big, medium and small cities. Spatial values show land use development as total areas of land use classes and as ratios of the number of inhabitants and land use areas. All the values are also related to road traffic intensity, as one of the most important indicators of the development of society in the last 40 years. Time development of the values of the indicators, multiple linear regression and correlation for both periods were used to show their dependency on road traffic intensity. The main conclusion from this analysis is that the political change followed by economical change had a strong impact on some of the land use class changes and road traffic intensity.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Anthony RM (2014) Bringing up the past: political experience and the distribution of urban populations. Cities 37:33–46
Banister D (2011a) Cities, mobility and climate change. J Transp Geogr 19:1538–1546
Banister D (2011b) The trilogy of distance, speed and time. J Transp Geogr 19:950–959
Banister D, Anderton K, Bonilla D, Givoni M, Schwanen T (2011) Transportation and the environment. Annu Rev Environ Resour 36:247–270
Barla P, Miranda-Moreno LF, Lee-Gosselin M (2011) Urban travel CO2 emissions and land use: a case study for Quebec City. Transp Res D-Transp Environ 16(6):423–428
Ewing R, Cervero R (2010) Travel and the built environment. J Am Plann Assoc 76(3):265–294
Fan F, Wang Y, Qiu M, Wang Z (2009) Evaluating the temporal and spatial urban expansion patterns of Guangzhou from 1979 to 2003 by remote sensing and GIS methods. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 23:1371–1388
Gallez C, Kaufmann V, Maksim H, Thebért M, Guerrinha C (2013) Coordinating transport and urban planning: from ideologies to local realities. Eur Plan Stud 21(8):1235–1255
Halounová L, Holubec V, Těhle M, Řehák M, Vepřek K (2013) Atlas of urban development in Czech cities (since 60-ies of the 20th century). FCE CTU in Prague, Prague. ISBN: 978-80-01-05177-1
Handy SL (1992) Regional versus local accessibility: neo-traditional development and its implications for non-work travel. Built Environ 18(4):253–267
Jacobson E (2003) The transportation-land use connection. Transportation and Growth Management, School of Urban Studies and Planning, College of Urban and Public Affairs, Portland State University
Kitamura R, Mokhtarian PL, Laidet L (1997) A micro-analysis of land use and travel in five neighborhoods in the San Francisco Bay Area. Transportation 24(2):125–158
Kuzmyak JR, Baber C, Savory D (2006) Conference: 85th annual meeting of the transportation-research-board location, Washington, D.C. Date: 22–26 Jan 2006 Transportation Research Record-Series Issue 1977, pp 145–153
Litman TA, Steele R (2013) How land use factors affect travel behaviour. Land use impacts on transport, transport policy institute. Available in pdf at: http://www.vtpi.org/landtravel.pdf, cited 18 Oct 2013
Ma KR, Banister D (2007) Urban spatial change and excess commuting. Environ Plan 39:630–646
Næss P, Sandberg SL (1996) Workplace location, modal split and energy use for commuting trips. Urban Stud 33(3):557–580
Newton C, Schuermans N (2013) More than twenty years after the repeal of the Group Areas Act: housing, spatial planning and urban development in post-apartheid South Africa. J Housing Built Environ 28(4):579–587
Ristimäki M, Kalenoja H (2011) Travel-related zones of urban form in urban and peri-urban areas. Track 11, 3rd World planning school congress, Perth
Stead D (2001) Relationships between land use, socioeconomic factors, and travel patterns in Britain. Environ Plann B Plan Des 28(4):499–528
Sykes AO (1992) An introduction to regression analysis. 1992 Coase lecture, the University of Chicago, http://www.law.uchicago.edu/node/1309.cit. Accessed 4 July 2014
Vepřek K (2000) Požadavky na jednotný způsob zpracování a hodnocení analýzy vývoje funkčních ploch a českých měst v konfrontaci s vývojem infrastruktury silniční dopravy/Demands on the unified way of processing and evaluation of analysis of functional areas in the Czech Republic vs the development of the road traffic infrastructure (in Czech only). Prague
Vepřek K (2009) Metodika hodnocení efektivnosti rozvoje silniční sítě z hlediska urbanizace/Methodology of evaluation of effectivity of the road traffic development from the urbanisation point of view. (in Czech only). Prague
Yen L, Wu AM (2014) Urbanization, land development, and land financing: evidence from chinese cities. J Urban Aff 36(SI Supplement: 1):354–368
Acknowledgments
The chapter presents results of the COST project with support of The Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports: Modelling of urban areas to lower the negative influences of human activities (OC10011)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Halounová, L., Holubec, V. (2015). Influence of Political Regime Change to Land Use Development in Urban Areas in the Czech Republic. In: Li, J., Yang, X. (eds) Monitoring and Modeling of Global Changes: A Geomatics Perspective. Springer Remote Sensing/Photogrammetry. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9813-6_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9813-6_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-017-9812-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-9813-6
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)