Skip to main content

Access to Higher Education, Affirmative Action

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of International Higher Education Systems and Institutions
  • 277 Accesses

Synonyms

Positive discrimination

Definitions

Affirmative action refers to the use of preferences favoring individuals in a particular group when making a choice between candidates. In regards to higher education, it refers to preferences in admissions decisions, i.e., being more likely to choose students from a certain group over others, all else equal. Framed more broadly, affirmative action is a policy focused on creating differential processes or applying different standards in order to promote more equal access to higher education opportunity. The preferences that receive the most attention are those for specific racial or ethnic groups, but affirmative action policies could alternatively be tailored to favor other student traits, such as low-income status (i.e., “economic” affirmative action). Additionally, college admissions committees have been shown to show preferences for students with legacy status (having a parent or other relative who has attended the institution),...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aguinis, H., S.A. Culpepper, and C.A. Pierce. 2016. Differential prediction generalization in college admissions testing. Journal of Educational Psychology 108: 1045–1059.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bettinger, Eric P., Brent J. Evans, and Devin G. Pope. 2013. Improving college performance and retention the easy way: Unpacking the ACT exam. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 5 (2): 26–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bound, John, Brad Hershbein, and Bridget T. Long. 2009. Student reactions to increasing college competition. Journal of Economic Perspectives 23 (4): 119–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, William G., Martin A. Kurzweil, and Eugene M. Tobin. 2005. Equity and excellence in American higher education. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridgeman, Brian, Laura McCamley-Jenkins, and Nancy Ervin. 2000. Predictions of freshman grade-point average from the revised and recentered SAT I: Reasoning test, Research report 2000-1. New York: College Entrance Examination Board.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cancian, Maria. 1998. Race-based versus class-based affirmative action in college admissions. Journal of Policy Analysis & Management 17 (1): 94–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deshpande, A. 2006. Affirmative action in India and the United States. In Equity & development: World development report. Washington, DC: The World Bank, Background Papers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, A. 2006. Affirmative action in higher education in India and the US: A study in contrast. Berkley: Center for Studies in Higher Education, University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, C., and S. Flores. 2003. Percent plans in college admissions: A comparative analysis of three states’ experiences. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Civil Rights Project.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoxby, Caroline M., and B.T. Long. 1999. Explaining rising income and wage inequality among the college-educated. Cambridge, MA: working paper no. 6873.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurlburt, Steven, and Rita J. Kirshstein. 2012. Spending: Where does the money go? Washington, DC: The Delta Cost Project at American Institutes for Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kain, J., and D. O’Brien. 2003. Hopwood and the top 10 percent law. Cecil and Ida Green Center for the Study of Science and Society, Working Paper, University of Texas at Dallas, Dallas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kane, T.J. 1998. Racial and ethnic preferences in college admissions. In The black-white test score gap, ed. C. Jencks and M. Phillips, 431–456. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, B.T., and Laura Kavazanjian. 2012. Affirmative action in tertiary education: A meta-analysis of global policies and practices. World Bank report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moses, M.S. 2010. Moral and instrumental rationales for affirmative action in five national contexts. Educational Researcher 39 (3): 211–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein, Jesse M. 2004. College performance predictions and the SAT. Journal of Econometrics 121 (1–2): 297–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, Emily J. 2015. An SAT validity primer. The College Board. Available at http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED558085.pdf

  • Vigdor, Jacob, and Charles Clotfelter. 2003. Retaking the SAT. Journal of Human Resources 38 (1): 1–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bridget Terry Long .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this entry

Cite this entry

Long, B.T. (2017). Access to Higher Education, Affirmative Action. In: Shin, J., Teixeira, P. (eds) Encyclopedia of International Higher Education Systems and Institutions. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9553-1_49-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9553-1_49-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-017-9553-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-9553-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education

Publish with us

Policies and ethics