Skip to main content

The UNEP/SETAC Life Cycle Initiative

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Background and Future Prospects in Life Cycle Assessment

Abstract

The activities of the UNEP/SETAC Life Cycle Initiative have been crucial for the dissemination of LCA worldwide and the creation of a global life cycle community, since 2002, after the ISO 14040 series had been established. The Life Cycle Initiative not only contributed to capability development and the set up of national and regional life cycle networks in different parts of the world but also to enhancing and building global consensus on life cycle methodologies in areas such as life cycle inventory (LCI), life cycle impact assessment (LCIA), social life cycle assessment as well as carbon and water footprinting. Moreover, the Life Cycle Initiative has successfully promoted the way leading companies are doing life cycle management (LCM) and the integration of the three dimensions of sustainable development in life cycle sustainability assessment (LCSA).

The chapter opens with an introduction on how the UNEP/SETAC Life Cycle Initiative came to life and developed over the years. Then the special relationship of the Life Cycle Initiative to The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment is highlighted. This section is followed by a description of the main contributions of the Life Cycle Initiative to the international community. In the subsequent section the key messages based on the work conducted during the last 10 years are described. The chapter finishes with some thoughts on the future of life cycle thinking and an introduction to the Phase 3 of the Life Cycle Initiative.

The chapter includes the list of key achievements of the Life Cycle Initiative’s Phase 1 and 2 activities that are the creation of a global life cycle community, the LCI Registry, the LCIA Midpoint-damage Framework, the USEtox model, the LCM guide and capability maturity framework, the social LCA guidelines, the LCSA framework and the global guidance principles for LCA databases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The conference series provides an international forum to share experiences on Life Cycle Thinking and related tools. CILCA is a bi-annual event which is held in different countries of Latin America convoking experts and interested audiences from across the globe. The first CILCA was held in 2005 in San José Costa Rica, and from there has followed a successful journey which included locations spread all along the region: Sao Paulo (Brazil) in 2007, Pucón (Chile) in 2009, and Coatzacoalcos (Mexico) in 2011.

References

  • Aloisi de Larderel J, Fava J (2003) Int J LCA—associated journal of the UNEP/SETAC life cycle initiative. Int J Life Cycle Assess 8(3):117

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayart J-B, Bulle C, Deschênes L, Margni M, Pfister S, Vince F, Koehler A (2010) A framework for assessing off-stream freshwater use in LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15(5):439–453

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Benoît-Norris C, Vickery-Niederman G, Valdivia S, Franze J, Traverso M, Ciroth A, Mazijn B (2011) Introducing the UNEP/SETAC methodological sheets for subcategories of social LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16(7):682–690

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjørn A, Owsianiak M, Laurent A, Molin C, Westh TB, Hauschild MZ (2013) Mapping and characterization of LCA networks. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:812–827

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman T, Masoni P, Dryer A, McDougall F (2003) International expert group on life cycle assessment for integrated waste management. Int J Life Cycle Assess 8(3):175–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Curran MA (2006) Report on activity of task force 1: data registry—global life cycle inventory data resources. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11(4):284–289

    Google Scholar 

  • Datta A, Strothmann S, Valdivia S, Vigon B (2012) First Indian life cycle assessment and management conference 2012. Int J Life Cycle Assess 17(7):944–945

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond ML, Gandhi N, Adams WJ, Atherton J, Bhavsar SP, Bulle C, Campbell PGC, Dubreuil A, Fairbrother A, Farley K, Green A, Guinee J, Hauschild MZ, Huijbregts MAJ, Humbert S, Jensen KS, Jolliet O, Margni M, McGeer JC, Peijnenburg WJGM, Rosenbaum R, van de Meent D, Vijver MG (2010) The clearwater consensus: the estimation of metal hazard in fresh water. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15(2):143–147

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fava J, Udo de Haes HA, Sonnemann G, Dubreuil A, Gloria T (2006) Key observations arising from papers on sustainable production, use and recycling of natural resources. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11(1):75–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkbeiner M (2009) Carbon footprinting—opportunities and threats. Int J Cycle Assess 14(2):91–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauschild MZ, Jolliet O, Huijbregts MAJ (2011) Editorial. LCIA of impacts on human health and ecosystems (USEtox)—a bright future for addressing chemical emissions in life cycle assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16(8):697–700

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellweg S, Demou E, Bruzzi R, Meijer A, Rosenbaum R, Huijbregts MAJ, McKone TE (2009) Integrating human indoor air pollutant exposure within life cycle impact assessment. Environ Sci Technol 43(6):1670–1679

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • ISO 14040 (1997) Environmental management—life cycle assessment—principles and framework. Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO 14046.CD.1 (2012) Water footprint—requirements and guidelines. Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO/TS 14067 (2013) Carbon footprint of products—requirements and guidelines for quantification and communication. Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Jolliet O, Müller-Wenk R, Bare J, Brent A, Goedkoop M, Heijungs R, Itsubo N, Peña C, Pennington D, Potting J, Rebitzer G, Stewart M, Udo de Haes HA, Weidema B (2004) The LCIA midpoint-damage framework of the UNEP/SETAC life cycle initiative. Int J Life Cycle Assess 9(6):394–404

    Google Scholar 

  • Jolliet O, Dubreuil A, Gloria T, Hauschild M (2005) Progresses in life cycle impact assessment within the UNEP/SETAC life cycle initiative. Int J Life Cycle Assess 10(6):447–448

    Google Scholar 

  • Koellner T, de Baan L, Beck T, Brandao M, Civit B, Goedkoop M, Margni M, Milà i Canals L, Müller-Wenk R, Weidema B, Wittstock B (2013) Principles for life cycle inventories of land use on a global scale. Int J Cycle Assess 18:1203–1215

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundie S, Huppes G, Ciroth A (2007) Inventory methods in LCA: towards improved methodological consistency—Report for UNEP-SETAC life cycle initiative life cycle inventory (LCI) programme task force 3 on methodological consistency, ISBN 3836486210

    Google Scholar 

  • Malmö Ministerial Declaration (2000) Global Ministerial Environment Forum—Sixth special session of the governing council of the United Nations Environment Programme. Nairobi

    Google Scholar 

  • Milà i Canals L, Bauer C, Depestele J, Dubreuil A, Freiermuth Knuchel R, Gaillard G, Michelsen O, Müller-Wenk R (2007) Key elements in a framework for land use impact assessment within LCA. Int J Cycle Assess 12(1):5–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum RK, Bachmann TM, Gold LS, Huijbregts MAJ, Jolliet O, Juraske R, Koehler A, Larsen HF, MacLeod M, Margni M, McKone TE, Payet J, Schuhmacher M, Van de Meent D, Hauschild MZ (2008) USEtox—the UNEP-SETAC toxicity model: recommended characterisation factors for human toxicity and freshwater ecotoxicity in life cycle impact assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13(7):532–546

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • SETAC (2005) Life-cycle assessment of metals: issues and research directions. Pensacola, 307 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • SETAC (2011) Environmental life cycle costing: a code of practice. Pensacola, 98 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonnemann G (2003) Start of the next phase: task forces and potential future crosscutting activities. Int J Life Cycle Assess 8(6):323

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonnemann G (2004a) Crosscutting issues to be explored by the UNEP/SETAC life cycle initiative. Int J Life Cycle Assess 9(1):67

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonnemann G (2004b) Strengthening capacity building through regional networks. Int J Life Cycle Assess 9(5):334

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonnemann G, Valdivia S (2007) First phase 2 activities of the UNEP/SETAC life cycle initiative. Int J Life Cycle Assess 12(7):544–545

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonnemann G, Solgaard A, Saur K, Udo de Haes HA, Christiansen K, Jensen AA (2001) Life cycle management: UNEP-workshop—sharing experiences on LCM. Int J Life Cycle Assess 6(6):325–333

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonnemann G, Quiros A, Musmanni S, Fava J, Schenk R, Ugaya C (2005) International conference on life cycle assessment 2005 (CILCA 2005), 25–28 April 2005, San Jose, Costa Rica. Int J Life Cycle Assess 10(2):163

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonnemann G, Vigon B, Broadbent C, Curran MA, Finkbeiner M, Frischknecht R, Inaba A, Schanssema A, Stevenson M, Ugaya C, Wang H, Wolf M-A, Valdivia S (2011) Process on ‘global guidance for LCA databases’. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16(1):95–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Swarr T (2011) A capability framework for managing social and environmental concerns. Int J Cycle Assess 16(7):593–595

    Google Scholar 

  • Töpfer K (2002) Editorial for Int J LCA on the launch of the UNEP-SETAC life cycle initiative. Int J Life Cycle Assess 7(4):191

    Google Scholar 

  • Udo de Haes HA, Jolliet O, Norris G, Saur K (2002) UNEP/SETAC life cycle initiative—background, aims and scope. Int J Life Cycle Assess 7(4):192–195

    Google Scholar 

  • UNEP (2003) Evaluation of environmental impacts in life cycle assessment. Paris, 96 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • UNEP/SETAC (2004) Why take a life cycle approach? Paris, 24 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • UNEP/SETAC (2007) Life cycle management—a business guide to sustainability. Paris, 52 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • UNEP/SETAC (2008) Communication of life cycle information in the buidling and energy sector. Paris, 176 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • UNEP/SETAC (2009a) Guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products. Paris, 103 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • UNEP/SETAC (2009b) Life cycle management—how business uses it to decrease footprint, create opportunities and make value chains more sustainable. Paris, 48 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • UNEP/SETAC (2011a) Global guidance principles for life cycle assessment databases—a basis for greener processes and products. Paris, 158 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • UNEP/SETAC (2011b) Towards a life cycle sustainability assessment—making informed choices on products. Paris, 65 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • UNEP/SETAC (2012a) Greening the economy through life cycle thinking—10 years of the UNEP/SETAC life cycle initiative. Paris, 60 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • UNEP/SETAC (2012b) Phase 2: 2007–2012. http://www.lcinitiative.unep.fr. Accessed 30 Oct 2012

    Google Scholar 

  • WBCSD/WRI (2011) Greenhouse gas protocol product standard. Geneva

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Acknowledgements to the ILCB members and donors of the UNEP/SETAC Life Cycle Initiative for providing the strategic advice and financial resources needed. See http://www.lifecycleinitiative.org for full list of current partners and further information on the initiative .

Moreover, the authors would like to thank Bruce Vigon from SETAC and Jim Fava as PMO co-chair for their support in moving the Life Cycle Initiative into Phase 3. Finally, the authors would like to recognize the work of Thad Mermer who helped the secretariat of the Life Cycle Initiative to develop the key messages.

Disclaimer

The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication does not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the UNEP/SETAC Life Cycle Initiative concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Moreover, the views expressed do not necessarily represent the decision or the stated policy of UNEP or SETAC, nor does citing of trade names or commercial processes constitute endorsement.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guido Sonnemann .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix—Glossary

Appendix—Glossary

10YFP

10-Year Framework of Programmes on sustainable consumption and production adopted during the last so-called Rio + 20 World Summit on sustainable development in June 2012

Apeldoorn declaration

Declaration by a group of specialists in LCA and Risk Assessment on practices and complications of life cycle impact assessment methodologies for non-ferrous metals

CILCA

International Conference on life cycle assessment in Latin America

CML

Institute of Environmental Sciences, an institute of the Faculty of Science of the Leiden University

E-LCA

Environmental Life Cycle Assessment

EPFL

Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne

ICMM

International Council on Mining and Metals

ISO

International Organization for Standardization

ILCB

International Life Cycle Initiative Board

ILCD

International Reference Life Cycle Data System developed by the European Commission

ILCP

International Life Cycle Initiative Panel

IRP

International Resource Panel

Life Cycle Initiative

UNEP/SETAC Life Cycle Initiative

LCC

Life Cycle Costing

LCI

Life Cycle Inventory

LCIA

Life Cycle Impact Assessment

LCM

Life Cycle Management

LCSA

Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment

Marrakech Process

A global process as called for by the World Summit on sustainable development’s Johannesburg plan of action to support the elaboration of a 10-Year framework of programmes on sustainable consumption and production

OECD

Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development

PMO

Project Management Office

SCP

Sustainable consumption and production

SETAC

Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry

Shonan Guidance Principles

Global guidance principles for life cycle assessment databases

S-LCA

Social life cycle assessment

TF

Task force

UNEP

United Nations Environment Programme

USEtox

Environmental model for characterization of human and ecotoxic impacts in life cycle impact assessment and for comparative assessment and ranking of chemicals according to their inherent hazard characteristics developed by a team of researchers from the Phase 1 Task force on toxic impacts under the UNEP-SETAC life cycle initiative

WAIG

Work Area Interest Group

WBCSD

World Business Council for Sustainable Development

WRI

World Resource Institute

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sonnemann, G., Valdivia, S. (2014). The UNEP/SETAC Life Cycle Initiative. In: Klöpffer, W. (eds) Background and Future Prospects in Life Cycle Assessment. LCA Compendium – The Complete World of Life Cycle Assessment. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8697-3_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics