Skip to main content

The Role of the Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC) in Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) Development and Application

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Background and Future Prospects in Life Cycle Assessment

Abstract

Although there was a demand for environmental health data on chemicals, there was no global scientific organization able to talk about the science behind the regulations being developed. The Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC) was founded in 1979. SETAC has three strengths: its global scale, its tripartite membership and governance, and its scientific base. Because SETAC was developed on an international scale, it has been able to address global environmental issues.

The SETAC North American LCA Advisory Group is a formally recognized group within SETAC that has been in existence since June 1991. Similarly, SETAC Europe established an LCA Steering Committee. Both the LCA Advisory and Steering Committee are referred to as the SETAC LCA Groups.

The LCA Groups report to the Board of Directors of both SETAC and SETAC Europe. Specific activities such as workshops, conferences, or educational material development, including ‘position papers’, are approved by the Board of Directors. During the 1990s these SETAC LCA Groups were instrumental in driving the scientific progress to codify the professional practice of LCA. During this time period, several major workshops were successfully organized and over a dozen key publications produced. The SETAC LCA Groups also broadly supported the initial preparation of the ISO 14040 series of voluntary international standards as well as their subsequent revisions.

The general mission of the SETAC LCA Groups is to proactively advance the science and application of LCAs to reduce the resource consumption and environmental burdens associated with products, packaging, processes or activities.

Although life cycle assessment promised to be a valuable tool in evaluating the environmental consequences of a product, process, or activity, the concept was relatively new and required a framework for further development.

The workshop, ‘A Technical Framework for Life Cycle Assessments’, held August 18–23, 1990, at Smugglers Notch, Vermont, was organized by SETAC to develop a framework and consensus on the current state of LCA and research needs for conducting life cycle assessments. Although life cycle assessments have been used, in one form or another, before the name was coined, this workshop report is the first document which presented the name of the method.

The four SETAC LCA workshops in Smugglers Notch (1990), Leiden (1991), Sandestin (1992) and Wintergreen (1992) formed a tiered process to culminate in the Code of Practice workshop of Sesimbra, Portugal, March 31–April 3, 1993.

Developing international consensus on harmonized methods has been a goal of the SETAC LCA workshops. The ‘Code of Practice’ completed the harmonization process. Shortly after the workshop, during the autumn of 1993, the ISO standardization process was initiated.

In 1994, as a result of the SETAC LCA workshops, the LCA Advisory Group of SETAC and the LCA Steering Committee of SETAC Europe established individual work groups to address specific LCA issues.

SETAC’s working groups and workshops have advanced both the application and reputation of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) by authoring LCA publications, supporting the development of LCA standardization, partnering with United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP), and advancing the use of LCA in various sectors. As SETAC grows and expands on its own and with its supporters and partners, it will continue to advance the understanding and use of LCA while ensuring that science is kept at the forefront of LCA development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    These were presented in Fava (2012) Life cycle knowledge informs greener products, Chap. 25, in: Curran MA (ed) LCA Handbook—a guide for environmentally sustainable products.

  2. 2.

    http://www.usa.philips.com/c/fluorescent-tubes/296298/cat/en/.

  3. 3.

    The Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) is designed to determine the mobility of both organic and inorganic analytes present in liquid, solid, and multiphasic wastes. http://www.epa.gov/osw/hazard/testmethods/sw846/pdfs/1311.pdf.

  4. 4.

    Information based on personal conversations with Coca-Cola employees.

  5. 5.

    Carson (2002) [1st Pub. Houghton Mifflin 1962]. Silent Spring. Mariner Books.ISBN 0-618-24906-0. Silent Spring initially appeared serialized in three parts in the June 16, June 23, and June 30, 1962 issues of The New Yorker magazine.

  6. 6.

    SETAC has a commitment to balance the scientific interests of government, academia and business.

  7. 7.

    The following recommendations are possible: Recommend SETAC sponsorship as a Pellston Workshop and submission to the SWC Technical Committee for consideration; Recommend SETAC sponsorship as a Technical Workshop at a national level; Recommend SETAC sponsorship as a Small Meeting at national level; Recommend SETAC sponsorship contingent upon securing funding; Recommend SETAC sponsorship contingent upon incorporation of mandatory changes; Recommend SETAC sponsorship with minor changes suggested; or, Recommend against SETAC sponsorship.

  8. 8.

    The SWC facilitates worldwide outreach to environmental scientists, engineers, and managers and encourages development of additional SETAC member groups.

  9. 9.

    Although the specific details between the two SETAC LCA groups may be slightly different, the intent of this section is to describe the role and value of the SETAC LCA groups in advancing LCA within SETAC generally.

  10. 10.

    Each LCA Group may have a slightly different mission but generally the purpose is to advance the science and development and application of LCA.

  11. 11.

    Recent topics of interest that are being considered for the Advisory Group, include: US Green Building Council’s LEED program to identify sustainable buildings; US Database project to make inventory data publicly available; Creation of LCA sessions at the annual SETAC meeting; Liaison with the various task forces within the Life Cycle Initiative; Development of an awards program to recognize exemplary contributions in the field; and, to Identify opportunities for capacity building in developing countries.

  12. 12.

    The six work groups were human health, ecological (chemical) stressor, ecological (nonchemical) stressor, resource depletion, valuation, and integration.

  13. 13.

    In today’s terminology, primary impact categories are considered Areas of Protection (AoP).

  14. 14.

    The six workgroups were data quality framework, materials, energy, environmental emissions, ecological health and exposure, and human health and exposure.

  15. 15.

    LCA advisory group in the USA, LCA steering committee in Europe.

  16. 16.

    United Nations Conference of Environment and Development (UNCED), Rio de Janeiro, June 1992.

  17. 17.

    World Summit on Sustainable Development, Johannesburg, September 2002.

  18. 18.

    http://www.iso.org/iso/home/about.htm.

  19. 19.

    Jim Fava, Chair, at the time Vice President, WESTON Solutions.

  20. 20.

    The four standards: General Principles of LCA; Life Cycle Inventory Phases of LCA; Impact Assessment LCA; and Interpretation of LCA.

  21. 21.

    http://www.setac.org/group/AGLCA.

  22. 22.

    The Advisory Committee for the Forum: Jim Fava, Chair, Managing Director of Five Winds International, and Vice-chair for the UNEP/SETAC International Life Cycle Panel; Deborah Dunning, President, International Design Center for the Environment; Pamela Horner, Sylvania and IESNA; Gregory A. Norris, Sylvatica, and Programme Manager for the UNEP/SETAC Life-Cycle Initiative program; Bob Peoples, Carpet & Rug Institute and CARE; Guido Sonnemann, UNEP/SETAC Life Cycle Initiative Secretariat; and, Wayne Trusty, President, Athena Sustainable Materials Institute.

  23. 23.

    The following sections are based on conversations with Bruce Vigon, Scientific Affairs Manager at SETAC.

  24. 24.

    http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1551-3793.

  25. 25.

    http://www.grc.org/.

References

  • Barnthouse L, Fava JA, Humphreys K, Hunt R, Laibson L, Noesen S, Norris G, Owens J, Todd J, Vigon B, Weitz K, Young J (eds) (1998) Life-cycle impact assessment—the state-of-the-art. Report of the SETAC life-cycle assessment (LCA) impact assessment workgroup, SETAC LCA advisory group. 2nd edn. SETAC Pensacola, FL, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaufort-Langeveld ASH de, Bretz R, van Hoof G, Hischier M, Jean P, Tanner T, Huijbregts M (eds) (2003) Code of life-cycle inventory practice. (book + CD) ISBN 1-880611-58-9. SETAC Press, Pensacola, FL, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Christiansen K (ed) (1997, May) Simplifying LCA—just a cut? Final report from the SETAC Europe LCA Screening and Streamlining Working Group. SETAC Europe. Brussels, Belgium

    Google Scholar 

  • Consoli F, Allen D, Boustead I, Fava J, Franklin W, Jensen AA, de Oude N, Parrish R, Perriman R, Postlethwaite D, Quay B, Séguin J, Vigon B (eds) (1993) Guidelines for life-cycle assessment: a ‘Code of Practice’. Edn 1. From the SETAC workshop held at Sesimbra, Portugal, 31 March–3 April 1993. SETAC Pensacola, FL, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • de Larderel JA, Fava J (2003) Int J LCA—Associated Journal of the UNEP/SETAC Life Cycle Initiative (Editorial). Int J Life Cycle Assess 8(3):117

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekvall T (2005) SETAC summaries. J Clean Prod 13(13–14):1351–1358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fava JA (2002) Life cycle initiative—a joint UNEP/SETAC partnership to advance the life-cycle economy. Int J Life Cycle Assess 7(4):196–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Fava JA, Denison R, Jones B, Curran MA, Vigon B, Selke S, Barnum J (eds) (1991) SETAC workshop report: a technical framework for life-cycle assessment. August 18–23, 1990, Smugglers Notch, Vermont. SETAC, Washington, DC, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Fava J, Consoli FJ, Denison R, Dickson K, Mohin T, Vigon B (eds) (1993, Mar) A conceptual framework for life-cycle impact assessment. Workshop report. SETAC and SETAC foundation for environmental education. Sandestin, Florida, February 1–7, 1992. Published by SETAC and SETAC foundation for environmental education, Pensacola, FL, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Fava J, Jensen AA, Lindfors L-G, Pomper S, De Smet B, Warren J, Vigon B (eds) (1994, June) Life-cycle assessment data quality: a conceptual framework. Workshop report. SETAC and SETAC foundation for environmental education. Wintergreen, Virginia, October 1992. Published by SETAC and SETAC foundation for environmental education, Pensacola, FL, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkbeiner M, Schau EM, Lehmann A, Traverso M (2010) Towards life cycle sustainability assessment. Sustainability 2(10):3309–3322. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su2103309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunkeler D, Saur K, Rebitzer G, Finkbeiner M, Schmidt WP, Jensen AA, Stranddorf H, Christiansen K (2004) Life-cycle management. ISBN 1-880611-77-5. SETAC Press, Pensacola

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt R, Franklin WE (1996) LCA—how it came about. Personal reflections on the origin and the development of LCA in the USA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 1(1):4–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Klöpffer W (1997) Peer (expert) review in LCA according to SETAC and ISO 14040—theory and practice. Int J Life Cycle Assess 2(4):183–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Klöpffer W (2003) Life-cycle based methods for sustainable product development. Int J Life Cycle Assess 8(3):157–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Klöpffer W (2005) The critical review process according to ISO 14040–43. An analysis of the standards and experiences gained in their application. Int J Life Cycle Assess 10(2):98–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Klöpffer W (2006) The role of SETAC in the development of LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11(Special issue 1):116–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Klöpffer W (2008) State-of-the-art in life cycle sustainability assessment (LCSA). Life cycle sustainability assessment of products (with comments by Helias A. Udo de Haes, p. 95). Int J Life Cycle Assess 13(2):89–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Klöpffer W (2012) The critical review of life cycle assessment studies according to ISO 14040 and 14044—origin, purpose and practical performance. Int J Life Cycle Assess 17(9):1087–1093

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotaji S, Schuurmans A, Edwards S (eds) (2003) Life-cycle assessment in building and construction—a state-of-the-art report. ISBN 1-880611-59-7. SETAC Press, Pensacola

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien M, Doig A, Clift R (1996) 6th SETAC Europe meeting: LCA—selected papers. Social and environmental life cycle assessment (SELCA). Approach and methodological development. Int J Life Cycle Assess 1(4):231–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Owens JW (1998) Life cycle impact assessment—the use of subjective judgments in classification and characterization. Int J Life Cycle Assess 3(1):43–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Owens JW (1999) Why life cycle impact assessment is now described as an indicator system. Int J Life Cycle Assess 4(2):81–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Poulsen PB, Jensen AA, Antonsson A-B, Bengtsson G, Karling M, Schmidt A, Brekke O, Becker J, Verschoor AH (eds) (2004) The working environment in LCA. ISBN 1-880611-68-6. SETAC Press, Pensacola

    Google Scholar 

  • Rebitzer G, Ekvall T (eds) (2004) Scenarios in life-cycle assessment. ISBN 1-880611-57-0. SETAC Press, Pensacola

    Google Scholar 

  • Todd JA, Curran MA (eds) (1999, Jul) Streamlined life-cycle assessment—a final report from the SETAC North America streamlined LCA workgroup. SETAC and SETAC foundation for environmental education

    Google Scholar 

  • Töpfer K (2002) Editorial for Int J LCA on the launch of the UNEP/SETAC Life Cycle Initiative. Int J Life Cycle Assess 7(4):191

    Google Scholar 

  • Udo de Haes HA (ed) (1996, Sept) Towards a methodology for life cycle impact assessment. ISBN 90-5607-005-3. Published by SETAC Europe, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • Udo de Haes HA, Jensen AA, Klöpffer W, Lindfors L-G (eds) (1994) Integrating impact assessment into LCA proceedings of the LCA symposium held at the fourth SETAC Europe congress, 11–14 April 1994, Brussels. Published by Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry-Europe, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • Udo de Haes HA, Jolliet O, Finnveden G, Hauschild M, Krewitt W, Müller-Wenk R (1999a) Best available practice regarding impact categories and category indicators in life cycle impact assessment. Background document for the second working group on life cycle impact assessment of SETAC Europe (WIA-2, Part 1). Int J Life Cycle Assess 4(2):66–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Udo de Haes HA, Jolliet O, Finnveden G, Hauschild M, Krewitt W, Müller-Wenk R (1999b) Best available practice regarding impact categories and category indicators in life cycle impact assessment. Background document for the second working group on life cycle impact assessment of SETAC Europe, Part 2. Int J Life Cycle Assess 4(3):167–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Udo de Haes HA, Finnveden G, Goedkoop M, Hauschild M, Hertwich EG, Hofstetter P, Jolliet O, Klöpffer W, Krewitt W, Lindeijer E, Müller-Wenk R, Olsen SI, Pennington DW, Potting J, Steen B (eds) (2002a) Life-Cycle impact assessment: striving towards best practice. ISBN 1-880611-54-6. SETAC Press, Pensacola

    Google Scholar 

  • Udo de Haes HA, Jolliet O, Norris G, Saur K (2002b) Life cycle initiative—background, aims and scope. Int J Life Cycle Assess 7(4):192–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Valdivia S, Ugaya CML, Hildenbrand J, Traverso M, Mazijn B, Sonnemann G (2012) A UNEP/SETAC approach towards a life cycle sustainability assessment—our contribution to Rio + 20. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18(9):1673–1685. doi:10.1007/s11367-012-0529-1

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James A. Fava .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix—Glossary

Appendix—Glossary

Global Coordinating Group (GCG)

The Global Coordinating Group (GCG) was formed in 2011 as a mechanism for communication between the regional Advisory and Steering Groups in Europe and North America and to allow the other Geographic Units to have representation in global SETAC LCA affairs

International Organization for Standardization (ISO)

After the LCA harmonization by SETAC, shortly after the workshop in Sesimbra in 1993, the LCA ISO standardization process was initiated

LCA in developing countries

SETAC’s role should be to use the LCA community to help develop LCA expertise by hosting learning sessions, webinars and developing education tools for developing countries that are advancing in using LCA

LCA in the building sector

LCA can now be used at two levels, at the level of the building as a whole and at the level of building materials or products

Pellston workshops

Pellston Workshops, named after the location of the first workshops (University of Michigan Field Station, Pellston, MI, USA). The goal of a Pellston Workshop is to promote advancement in the resolution of truly cutting-edge technical and policy issues in environmental science, while enhancing strategies of science and philosophy

SETAC LCA groups

The SETAC LCA European group is named ‘LCA Steering Committee’

 

The SETAC LCA North American group is named ‘LCA Advisory Group’

Technical workshops

SETAC supports the convening of technical workshops to bring together experts to discuss and resolve timely technical, scientific or policy issues related to environmental science. SETAC’s level of support can range from simply providing an endorsement (e.g., non-exclusive license to use SETAC name or logo for promotional purposes) to providing full technical and scientific support, as long as basic principles are met

UNEP/SETAC Life Cycle Initiative

In 2002, the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), the Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC) and partners from governments, academia, civil society, business and industry joined forces to promote life cycle approaches worldwide. This was done to increase resource-efficiency and to accelerate a transition towards more sustainable consumption and production patterns. Sustainable development objectives and a company’s bottom line come together in the important topic of assessing and managing the life cycle of processes, materials, products and services

Work groups Life Cycle Impact Assessment

The Life Cycle Impact Assessment workgroup of the LCA Advisory Group of SETAC and that of the LCA Steering Committee of SETAC Europe prepared two individual reports on LCIA. They can be seen as complementary documents. The reports elaborate strong similarities but also a limited number of different positions

 

SETAC Europe Report: Towards a Methodology for Life Cycle Impact Assessment. September 1996

 

Report of the SETAC Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) Impact Assessment Workgroup, SETAC LCA Advisory Group: Life Cycle Impact Assessment—The State-of-the-Art 1998

Work groups Simplified/Streamlined LCA

In 1994 the LCA Steering Committee of SETAC Europe established the Workgroup Screening and Streamlining. In the same year, the SETAC North America workgroup on Streamlining LCA was initiated. Both groups concluded their multi-year efforts on the issue of Simplifying/Streamlining by a report in each case. The approaches of the reports are different

 

SETAC Europe Report: Simplifying LCA: Just a Cut? Final report from the SETAC Europe LCA Screening and Streamlining Working Group. Editor: Kim Christiansen. May 1997

 

The report of SETAC Europe discusses the methods for producing simplified procedures, commonly described as screening LCA studies, streamlined LCA studies and simplified LCA studies

 

Streamlined Life Cycle Assessment: A Final Report from the SETAC North America Streamlined LCA Workgroup. Edited by: Joel Ann Todd and Mary Ann Curran. July 1999

 

The report of SETAC North America is more a description of carefully planning and stating an LCA’s goal than it is about Streamlined LCA methodology

Workshop Leiden

‘Life-Cycle Assessment—Inventory, Classification, Valuation, Data Bases’. December 2–3, 1991, Leiden, The Netherlands

 

It was concluded that the term LCA can best be interpreted as ‘life cycle assessment’ instead of ‘life cycle analysis’

Workshop Sandestin

‘A conceptual framework for life cycle impact assessment’. February 1–7, 1992, Sandestin, Florida

 

The aim of this workshop was to develop a consensus on the state of the practice and research needs for conducting life cycle impact assessments. The workshop reaffirmed the value of the three-component model for LCAs developed at the Smugglers Notch workshop in 1990. Also, building on the results of the Leiden workshop in 1991, a goal definition and scoping component was incorporated as an additional step

Workshop Sesimbra

‘Code of Practice’. Sesimbra, Portugal, March 31 to April 3, 1993

 

The European and North American organizations of SETAC planned and conducted the LCA ‘Code of Practice’ Workshop

 

The ‘Code of Practice’ was intended as guidance for all individuals who commission, carry-out, review, or use the results of an LCA, and should be used to enhance the quality, transparency, and credibility of such studies

 

Shortly after this workshop, the LCA ISO standardization process was initiated

Workshop Smugglers Notch

‘A technical framework for life cycle assessment’. August 18–23, 1990, Smugglers Notch, Vermont

 

The workshop was to develop a framework and consensus on the current state of LCA and research needs for conducting life cycle assessments. Although life cycle assessments have been used, in one form or another, before the name was coined, this workshop report is the first document which presented the name of the method

Workshop Wintergreen

‘Data quality: a conceptual framework’. October 4–9, 1992, in Wintergreen, Virginia

 

The workshop provided a strong statement that data quality assessment is an integral part of LCA

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fava, J., Smerek, A., Heinrich, A., Morrison, L. (2014). The Role of the Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC) in Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) Development and Application. In: Klöpffer, W. (eds) Background and Future Prospects in Life Cycle Assessment. LCA Compendium – The Complete World of Life Cycle Assessment. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8697-3_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics