Skip to main content

The History and Evolution of Transradial Coronary Interventions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Transradial Approach for Percutaneous Interventions
  • 882 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter gives an overview of the development and evolution of transradial coronary access. The history of transradial coronary interventionsis a bit artificially divided into the following phases: prehistory, pioneering phase, a phase of international recognition and one of international acceptance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Radner S. Thoracal aortography by catheterization from the radial artery; preliminary report of a new technique. Acta Radiol. 1948;29(2):178–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Seldinger SI. Catheter replacement of the needle in percutaneous arteriography; a new technique. Acta Radiol. 1953;39(5):368–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sones Jr FM, Shirey EK. Cine coronary angiography. Mod Concepts Cardiovasc Dis. 1962;31:735–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ricketts HJ, Abrams HL. Percutaneous selective coronary cine arteriography. JAMA. 1962;181:620–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Judkins MP. Selective coronary arteriography.I.A percutaneous transfemoral technique. Radiology. 1967;89:815–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Campeau L. Entry sites for coronary angiography and therapeutic interventions from the proximal to the distal radial artery. Can J Cardiol. 2001;17:319–25.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Campeau L. Percutaneous radial artery approach for coronary angiography. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1989;16:3–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Otaki M. Percutaneous transradial approach for coronary angiography. Cardiology. 1992;81:330–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Serruys PW, de Jaegere P, Kiemeneij F, et al. A cpmparison of balloon expandable stent implantation with balloon angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 1994;331:489–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kiemeneij F, Laarman GJ, de Melker E. Transradial coronary artery angioplasty. Circulation. 1993;88:I–251. abstract.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kiemeneij F, Laarman GJ, de Melker E. Transradial coronary artery angioplasty. Am Heart J. 1995;129:1–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kiemeneij F, Laarman GJ. Percutaneous transradial artery approach for coronary Palmaz-Schatz stent implantation. Am Heart J. 1994;128:167–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. http://www.escardio.org/communities/EAPCI/news/Pages/radial-approach-consensus.aspx

  14. Kiemeneij F, Laarman GJ, Odekerken D, Slagboom T, van der Wieken R. A randomized comparison of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty by the radial, brachial and femoral approaches: the ACCESS study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;29:1269–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Doyle BJ, Rihal CS, Gastineau DA, Holmes Jr DR. Bleeding, bloodtransfusion, and increased mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention: implications for contemporary practice. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53:2019–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Agostoni P, Biondi-Zoccai GC, de Benedictis ML, et al. Radial versus femoral approach for percutaneous coronary diagnostic procedures; Systematic overview and meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44:349–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Jolly SS, Amlani S, Hamon M, Yusuf S, Mehta SR. Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography or intervention and the impact on major bleeding and ischemic events: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Am Heart J. 2009;157(1):132–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Chase AJ, Fretz EB, Warburton WP, et al. Association of the arterial access site at angioplasty with transfusion and mortality: the M.O.R.T.A.L. Study (mortality benefit of reduced transfusion after percutaneous coronary intervention via the arm or leg). Heart. 2008;94:1019–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Jolly SS, Yusuf S, Cairns J, Niemelä K, Xavier D, Widimsky P, Budaj A, Niemelä M, Valentin V, Lewis BS, Avezum A, Steg PG, Rao SV, Gao P, Afzal R, Joyner CD, Chrolavicius S, Mehta SR, RIVAL trial group. Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes (RIVAL): a randomised, parallel group, multicentre trial. Lancet. 2011;377(9775):1409–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Romagnoli E, Biondi-Zoccai G, Sciahbasi A, Politi L, Rigattieri S, Pendenza G, Summaria F, Patrizi R, Borghi A, Di Russo C, Moretti C, Agostoni P, Loschiavo P, Lioy E, Sheiban I, Sangiorgi G. Radial versus femoral randomized investigation in ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: the RIFLE-STEACS (Radial Versus Femoral Randomized Investigation in ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60(24):2481–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Valgimigli M, et al. Radial versus femoral access in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing invasive management: a randomised multicentre trial. Lancet. 2015;385(9986):2465–76.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Feldman DN, Swaminathan RV, Kaltenbach LA, Baklanov DV, Kim LK, Wong SC, Minutello RM, Messenger JC, Moussa I, Garratt KN, Piana RN, Hillegass WB, Cohen MG, Gilchrist IC, Rao SV. Adoption of radial access and comparison of outcomes to femoral access in percutaneous coronary intervention: an updated report from the national cardiovascular data registry (2007-2012). Circulation. 2013;127(23):2295–306.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hamon M, Pristipino C, Di Mario C, et al. Consensus document on the radial approach in percutaneous cardiovascular interventions: position paper by the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions and Working Groups on Acute Cardiac Care and Thrombosis of the European Society of Cardiology. EuroIntervention. 2013;8:1242–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. The Task Force on the management of ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J. 2012;33:2569–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ferdinand Kiemeneij MD, PhD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kiemeneij, F. (2017). The History and Evolution of Transradial Coronary Interventions. In: Zhou, Y., Kiemeneij, F., Saito, S., Liu, W. (eds) Transradial Approach for Percutaneous Interventions. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-7350-8_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-7350-8_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-017-7349-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-7350-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics