Abstract
Husserl’s attempts to refute certain forms of relativism, especially psychologism, historicism, biological specism, all of which he regarded as relativistic, in the Logische Untersuchungen and in the Logos essay of 1910 are well-known,1 and I will not discuss them here. In general, from the very inception phenomenology has been anti-relativistic. Husserl thought he had conclusively refuted relativism, by refuting some varieties of it. Paradoxically enough, Husserl’s thinking had elements which gave rise to relativism from within phenomenology. The task therefore which he tried to face up to was: how to overcome relativism, if refutation was not possible? One can make a strong argument to the effect that relativism cannot be refuted, for refutation would make use of a logic and the relativism may not accept the validity of that logic.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mohanty, J.N. (1997). Husserl on Relativism in the Late Manuscripts. In: Hopkins, B.C. (eds) Husserl in Contemporary Context. Contributions to Phenomenology, vol 26. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1804-2_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1804-2_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4816-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-1804-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive