Abstract
Thomas Uebel’s penetrating book represents the latest outcome of a series of investigations on Otto Neurath and the “forgotten” Vienna Circle he has published over the last ten years. Within the recent galaxy of studies devoted to logical empiricism, the re-evaluation of Neurath’s all too neglected work as well as of the “first” Vienna Circle are unquestionably very much indebted to Uebel’s contributions, which may be considered, in turn, an original development of Rudolf Haller’s pioneering studies on Austrian philosophy and on its leading role in the rise of the Vienna Circle. In particular, the attention paid by Haller to Neurath’s surprising epistemological actuality and moreover the “new light” he shed on the “first” Vienna Circle (Philipp Frank, Hans Hahn, and Otto Neurath in the years between 1907 and 1912)1 constitute the core of Uebel’s wide program of historical and, at the same time, philosophical research. An ambitious, but successful programm, that nowadays appears to us as essentially accomplished.2
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
See R. Haller, “New Light on the Vienna Circle”, The Monist, LXV, 1982, p. 25–37; “Der erste Wiener Kreis”, Erkenntnis, vol. 22, 1985, p. 341–358; Neopositivismus. Eine historische Einführung in die Philosophie des Wiener Kreises, Darmstadt, Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1993, p. 45–60.
Here we might remember some of Uebel’s main contributions: Th. Uebel (ed.), Rediscovering the Forgotten Vienna Circle, Dordrecht, Kluwer, 1991; Overcoming Logical Positivism from Within. The Emergence of Neurath’s Naturalism in the Vienna Circle’s Protocol Sentence Debate, Amsterdam, Rodopi, 1992; “On Neurath’s Both”, in N. Cartwright, J. Cat, L. Fleck, Th. Uebel, Otto Neurath: Philosophy between Science and Politics, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1996, p. 89–166.
Of course, a similar insight was clearly stimulated by the discussion on the roots and the rise of totalitarism in the 20th century — a discussion which presupposes, in turn, the tragic crisis of modernity as well as the unaspected revival (according to Ernst Cassirer’s analysis, from which — it seems to me — Frank was probably inspired) of the “Myth of the State”.
For a short discussion of some recent inquiries on Neurath see M. Ferrari, “Recent Works on Otto Neurath”, in M. Rédei/M. Stöltzner (eds.), John von Neumann and the Foundations of Quantum Physics, Dordrecht-Boston-London, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2001, pp. 319–327.
M. Friedman, Reconsidering Logical Positivism, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1999.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Uebel, T., Ferrari, M. (2002). Vernunftkritik und Wissenschaft. Otto Neurath und der erste Wiener Kreis. In: Heidelberger, M., Stadler, F. (eds) History of Philosophy of Science. Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook [2001], vol 9. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1785-4_30
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1785-4_30
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5976-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-1785-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive