Abstract
First, there are some striking similarities in the history of reception of Fleck’s and Neurath’s ideas. Due to the style of their writings they were not or often not well welcome in their national philosophical communities, i.e., the Vienna Circle and the Lvov-Warsaw School. This is especially true in the case of Fleck. On the other hand, some prominent logical positivists, like Hempel, are to some extent guilty of making of Neurath a clumsy thinker whose ideas needed to be clear by a more mature philosopher, i.e. Carnap. So their work was often considered as non-scientific. With a lack of response their theories were forgotten for many years, and even if not forgotten they were habitually ridiculed by critics. After a long period of seven thin years they have their renaissance. They are even quite popular. In the last 20 years a number of excellent books and papers on Neurath and Fleck have apperared. But one can hardly find a line of comparison. One might say that this is not surprising at all, as there is nothing to compare there. Neurath was a radical positivist while Fleck’s writing were aimed only against neopositivism. Accordingly, these are poles, and all we can say is that they are completely different. But even if Neurath was a follower of radical neopositivism that Fleck was fighting with, there are some common points in their programmes and I will try to show that even if they are in opposition, their paths intersected at certain points.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bilikiewicz, Tadeusz [1939/19861: “Uwagi nad artykulem Ludwika Flecka Nauka a Srodowisko”, in: [Fleck 1986, 189197]; 1st edition: Przeglqd Wspolczesny, nr 8–9 (1939), 175–167.
Cohen, Robert S. and Schnelle, Thomas (eds.), [ 1986 ]: Cognition and Fact. Materials of Ludwik Fleck, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 87, Dordrecht — Boston — Lancaster — Tokyo: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
Fleck, Ludwik [1929/1986]: “On the Crisis of ‘Reality’”, in: [Cohen, Schnelle 1986, 47–57]; 1st edition: “Zur Krise der ‘Wirklichkeit’”, Naturwissenschaften, 17 (1929), 425–430.
Fleck, Ludwik [1935]: “Zagadnienie teorji poznawania”, Przeglqd Filozofrczny, XXXIX (1935), zesz. I, 3–37.
Fleck, Ludwik [1935/1979]: Genesis and Development of Scientific Fact, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago 1979; 1st edition: Entstehung und Entwicklung einer wissenschaftlichen Tatsache. Einführung in die Lehre vom Denkstil und Denkkollektiv, Benno Schwabe und Co. Verlagbuchhandlung, Basel 1935.
Fleck, Ludwik [1938]: “Dyskusja. W sprawie artykulu p. Izydory Dgbskiej w Przegl4dzie Filozoficznym”, Przeglqd Filozofrczny, XLI (1938), zesz. II, 192–195.
Fleck, Ludwik [1939/1986]: “Odpowiedk na uwagi Tadeusza Bilikiewicza”, in: [Fleck 1986, 198–202]; 1st edition: Przeglqd Wspolczesny, nr 8–9 (1939), 168–174.
Fleck, Ludwik [1946/1986]: “Problems of Science of Science”, in: [Cohen, Schnelle 1986, 113–127]; 1st edition: 2ycie Nauki. Miesiecznik Naukoznawczy, t. I, nr 5 (1946), 322–336.
Fleck, Ludwik [1960/1986]: “Crisis in Science”, in: [Cohen, Schnelle 1986, 153–158]
Fleck, Ludwik [1986]: Powstanie i rozwdj faktu naukowego. Wprowadzenie do nauki o stylu myslowym i kolektywie myslowym, Lublin: Wydawnictwo Lubelskie (translation of 1935/1979; some additional papers included).
Hempel, Carl G. [1935]: “On the Logical Positivists’ Theory of Truth”, Analysis, Vol. 2, No. 4 (1935), 49–59.
Kokoszynska, Maria [ 1936 ]: “Über den absoluten Wahrheitsbegriff und einige andere semantische Begriffe”, Erkenntnis, VI (1936), 143–165.
Neurath, Otto [ 1983 ]: Philosophical Papers 1913–1946, Vienna Circle Collection, Vol. 16, Dordrecht — Boston — Lancaster: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
Neurath, Otto [ 1931 ]: “Magie und Technik”, Erkenntnis, II (1931), 82–84.
Neurath, Otto [1931a/1983]: “Ways of the Scientific World-Conception”, in: [Neurath 1983, 32–47]; 1st edition: “Wege der wissenschaftlichen Weltauffassung”, Erkenntnis, l (1930/31), 106–125.
Neurath, Otto [1931b/1983]: “Sociology in the Framework of Physicalism”, in: [Neurath 1983, 58–90]; 1st edition: “Soziologie im Physikalismus”, Erkenntnis, II (1931), 393–431.
Neurath, Otto [1931c/1983]: “An International Encyclopedia of Unified Science”, in: [Neurath 1983, 139–144]; 1st edition: “Une encyclopédie internationale de la science unitaire”, Actes du Congrès International de Philosophie Scientifrque, Vol. 2: Unité de la science, Hermann, Paris 1936, 54–59.
Neurath, Otto [ 1932 ]: “Protokollsatze”, Erkenntnis, III (1932/33), 204–214.
Neurath, Otto [1934/1983]: “Radical Physicalism and the ‘Real World’”, in: [Neurath 1983, 100–114]; 1st edition: “Radikaler Physikalismus und ‘wirkliche Welt’”, Erkenntnis, IV (1934), 346–362.
Neurath, Otto [ 1935 ]: “Erster internationaler Kongress für Einheit der Wissenschaft in Paris (Congrès international de philosophie scientifique)”, Erkenntnis, V (1935), 377–428.
Neurath, Otto [1935a/1983]: “The Unity of Science as a Task”, in: [Neurath 1983, 115–120]; oryg. „Einheit der Wissenschaft als Aufgabe“, Erkenntnis, V (1935), 16–22.
Neurath, Otto [1936/1983]: “Encyclopedia as a ‘Model’”, in: [Neurath 1983, 145–158]; 1st edition: “L’encyclopdie comme ‘modéle’”, Revue de Synthése, 12 (1936), 187–201.
Neurath, Otto [1937/1983]: “Unified Science and its Encyclopedia”, in: [Neurath 1983, 172–182]; 1st edition: Philosophy of Science, 4 (1937), 265–277.
Neurath, Otto [1941/1983]: “Universal Jargon and Terminology”, in: [Neurath 1983, 213–229]; Ist edition: Proceedings of Aristotelian Society, N.S. 41 (1940–41), 127–148.
Neurath, Otto [1946/1983]: “The Orchestration of the Science by the Encyclopedism of Logical Empiricism”, in: [Neurath 1983, 230–242]; 1st edition: Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 6 (1946), 496–508.
Israel Scheffler [ 1967 ]: Science and Subjectivity, Indianapolis — New York — Kansas City: The Bobbs-Merrill Company, Inc.
Schlick, Moritz [ 1934 ]: “Über das Fundament der Erkenntnis”, Erkenntnis, IV (1934), 79–99.
Toulmin, Stephen [1986]: “Ludwik Fleck and the Historical Interpretation of Science”, in: [Cohen and Schnelle 1986, 267–285].
Zolo, Danilo [ 1989 ] Reflexive Epistemology. The Philosophical Legacy of Otto Neurath, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht — Boston — London 1989.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Koterski, A. (2002). Affinities between Fleck and Neurath. In: Heidelberger, M., Stadler, F. (eds) History of Philosophy of Science. Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook [2001], vol 9. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1785-4_23
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1785-4_23
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5976-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-1785-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive