Abstract
1. By an (explicit) definition of a descriptive predicate ‘Q’ with one argument we understand a sentence of the form
where at the place of ‘...x...’ a sentential function—called the definiens—stands which contains ‘x’ as the only free variable. For several arguments the form is analogous. We will say that a definition D is based upon the class C of predicates if every descriptive symbol occurring in the definiens of D belongs to C. If the predicates of a class C are available in our language we may introduce other predicates by a chain of definitions of such a kind that each definition is based upon C and the predicates defined by previous definitions of the chain.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
In contradistinction to the term ’atomic sentence’ or ’elementary sentence’ as used by Russell or Wittgenstein.
Carnap, The Logical Syntax of Language,Routledge and Kegan Paul, London 1936, §51.
Compare Carnap, ibid., §59.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1978 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Carnap, R. (1978). Dispositions and Definitions. In: Tuomela, R. (eds) Dispositions. Synthese Library, vol 113. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1282-8_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1282-8_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-8347-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-1282-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive