Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Philosophy and Medicine ((PHME,volume 69))

Abstract

The concept of solidarity is omnipresent, at least in Germany’s public discourse. It has become a slogan that decorates the election campaigns of almost every political party. Unions appeal to the solidarity of the working class. Church representatives call upon us for ‘solidarity with the poor’. References to the value of ‘solidarity’ dominate discussions about the future of the welfare state as well as reflections on the more general question of the social coherence of modern societies. Nevertheless: the more popular the concept, the more ambiguous its meaning. What remains is a wishy-washy concept of solidarity that tries to evoke a vague sense of belonging, a readiness to help, or the value of social responsibility. This is the case not only with the trivialised or everyday use of the concept and its role in political discourse; it also holds for philosophical and sociological debates. Even here we find inconsistencies and a broad variety of implicit meanings attributed to the notion of solidarity.

One thing will remain from socialism: It has sharpened our awareness that solidarity is more than a moral sentiment

Warnfried Dettling (DIE ZEIT December 27, 1996)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Amengual, G.: 1990, Gattungswesen als Solidarität. Die Auffassung vom Menschen in der Bestimmung des Gattungswesens als Begriff und Grundlegung der Solidarität,’ in H.-J. Braun (ed.), Ludwig Feuerbach und die Philosophie der Zukunft, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brudney, D.: 1999, Marx’ Attempt to Leave Philosophy, Harvard University Press, Harvard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brumlik, M. and Brunkhorst, H. (eds.): 1993, Gemeinschaft und Gerechtigkeit, Fischer, Frankfurt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, D.B.: 1999, `Blacks and Jews,’ New York Review of Books, December 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E.: 1893/1978, De la division du travail social,Presses Universitaires de France, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evers, A. and M. Klein: 2001, Solidarity and Care in Germany’ (this volume).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordimer, N.: 1994, None to accompany me, Bloomsbury, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J.: 1998, Die Einbeziehung des Anderen, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, G.W.F.: 1987, Vorlesungen zur Philosophie des Rechts, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honneth, A.: 1993, `Posttraditionale Gemeinschaften,’ in H. Bnmkhorst and M. Brumlik (eds.), Gemeinschaft und Gerechtigkeit, Fisher, Frankfurt am Main.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hook, B.: 1995, Killing rage: ending racism, Holt, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radin, M.J.: 1996, Contested Commodities, Harvard University Press, Harvard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R.: 1989, Contingeny, Irony, Solidarity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge/N.Y.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartre, J.-P.: 1960, Critique de la Raison Dialectique, Gallimard, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schipperges, H.: 1996, Geschichte der Medizin, Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C.: 1985, `Distributive Justice,’ Philosophical Papers, II, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theunisn n, M.: 1981, Selbstverwirklichung und Allgemeinheit, De Gruyter, Berlin/New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tugendhat, E.: 1994, Vorlesungen über Ethik, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walzer, M.: 1983, Spheres of Justice, Basic Book, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wildt, A.: 1992, `Solidarität,’ in J. Ritter and K.-F. Gründer (eds.), Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie, 8, Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, Darmstadt, p. 1004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wildt, A.: 1995, Zur Begriffs-und Ideengeschichte von Solidarität,’ in H. Bayertz, Solidarität. Rechtsphilosophische Hefte, 4, Frankfurt am Main.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jaeggi, R. (2001). Solidarity and Indifference. In: ter Meulen, R., Arts, W., Muffels, R. (eds) Solidarity in Health and Social Care in Europe. Philosophy and Medicine, vol 69. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9743-2_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9743-2_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5887-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-9743-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics