Abstract
I. In this essay I put forward the thesis that Husserl’s concept of history underwent a certain development, gradually making its way from rather inconspicuous beginnings according to the progressive differentiation of his method. To put it more precisely, I hope to show that Husserl’s so-called “turn” to history, as found explicitly in the Crisis, must be understood as an intrinsic consequence of the procedure Husserl inaugurated when he founded transcendental phenomenology.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Reference
See for instance Karl-Heinz Lembeck, Gegenstand Geschichte. Geschichtswissenschaftstheorie in Husserls Phänomenologie (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1988).
for connections and differences between Husserl and Dilthey see. Elisabeth Ströker, “Systematische Beziehungen der Husserlschen Philosophie zu Dilthey,” in: Ernst Wolfgang Orth (ed.), Dilthey und die Philosophie der Gegenwart, (Freiburg: Karl Alber Verlag, 1985), 63–96.
As a matter of fact, it is Husserl’s concept of history, rather than his concept of the life-world, that is genuinely new in the Crisis. Cf. David Carr, Phenomenology and the Problem of History (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1974). Furthermore see the literature as quoted in footnote 3 of Chapter VIII.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ströker, E. (1997). The Question of History and “History” in Husserl’s Intentional Analysis. In: The Husserlian Foundations of Science. Contributions to Phenomenology, vol 30. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8824-9_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8824-9_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4910-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-015-8824-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive