Skip to main content
  • 111 Accesses

Abstract

The last sentence of the first chapter2 as well as the last sentence of the first paragraph of the second chapter 3 show in unequivocal language that Aristotle spoke here as a philosopher to philosophers, and that he spoke in a ‘philosophical attitude’ about a ‘philosophical subject-matter’. He therefore did not speak in what, following modern parlance, we shall call a ‘natural attitude’ 4 about a ’natural subject-matter’. Aristotle was very careful to set the life and activities of the philosopher 5 apart from the life and activities of other men 6, although he emphasized that every man could become a lover of wisdom - a philo-sophos 7. Yet, while ‘all men strive to see and know’8, such striving does not by itself bring about the actuality (ενέργεια) of the ‘theoretical life’ 9. The actuality of the theoretical life is clearly differentiated both from that of the life of mere empeiria 10 and from that of techne and episteme11. The man of techne and episteme is already a great deal advanced over the man of mere empeiria. He already ‘sees the differences’ (διαφοράς) by virtue of logos (λόγος) and (εϊδος); he directs his attention to ‘universals’ (καθόλου) rather than to singulars 12, and knows the ‘causes’ (αίτιαι). However, the actuality of his life is still fundamentally different from that of the man who ‘loves wisdom’ (φιλό-σοφος)13.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. έξις

    Google Scholar 

  2. Meta., Book 1, 1003a, 30: therefore, it is of being as being that ‘we too’ must grasp the first causes.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ibid., 1103b, 19: if, then, substance is the primary thing, it is of substance that ‘the philosopher’ must grasp the principles and causes.

    Google Scholar 

  4. e.g. as used by E. Husserl in Ideen zu einer reinen Phaenomenologie und Phaenomenologischen Philosophie, Bd. 1, S. 57. We do not want to use the designation ‘empirical’ because Aristotle attaches a particular meaning to empeiria. Nor do we want to create the impression that we denied that Aristotle’s method is an empirical one in the sense that he always starts from the concrete beings as they present themselves. P. 25ff.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Nicomachean Ethics, 1177a, 14.

    Google Scholar 

  6. cf. Meta., 982a, 5 ff; 982a, 20 ff; 982b, 27 ff; 1072b, 18 ff; 1074b, 15 ff. Nie. Eth., 1097b, 23 ff; 1141a, 9 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  7. cf. Ibid.; also De Anima, Book III, Ch. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Meta., 980, 22. πάντες άνθρωποι του είδέαι ορέγονται. The translation must bring out the ‘seeing’ implied in the word είδέαι.

    Google Scholar 

  9. cf. Ibid., the description 981b, 26 ff and 982a, 16 ff and Nie. Eth., 1177a, 12 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  10. cf. Meta., 980b, 26 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  11. More correct: Ibid., 980b, 26: techne and logismos.

    Google Scholar 

  12. cf. Ibid., 980b, 29 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ibid., 981b, 26 ff, 982a, 16 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Meta., 980a, 23.

    Google Scholar 

  15. cf. Ibid., 981b, 29 ff and De An., 429b, 21 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  16. cf. Ibid., 982b, 11 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  17. cf. Ibid., 982b, 19. See also, p. 64 infra.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ibid., 982b, 17 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  19. De An., 430a, 14.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Meta., 981b, 29.

    Google Scholar 

  21. cf. Nic. Eth., 1094a, 1 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Nie. Eth, 1139b, 18, 1141a, 3.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ibid., 1139b, 24.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ibid., 1139b, 24-25.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ibid., 1139b, 25.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ibid., 1141a, 1-3.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ibid., 1141a, 3.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ibid., 1140b, 33.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ibid., 1141a, 9 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  30. cf. Plato, Parmenides, 130E ff.: μεταξύ.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Nie. Eth., 1141a, 9. λείπεται νουν είναι των άρχων.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Ibid., 1141a, 19.ή σοφία νους καΐ επιστήμη.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Ibid., 1141a, 17-20. άληθεύειν περί τάς αρχάς.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Ibid., 1141a, 19. κεφαλήν έχουσα επιστήμη των τιμιωτάτων.

    Google Scholar 

  35. cf. also Meta., 1072b, 23.

    Google Scholar 

  36. cf. H. Diels, Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker, Bd. I. Frag. 12: 18. Περί Φύσεως: πάντων νους κρατεί.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Ibid., Frag. 8: 34, Περί Φύσεως: ταύτον δ’εστί νοεϊν τε καί οΰνεκεν έ*στι νόημα.

    Google Scholar 

  38. cf. also C. G. Gadamer, Zur Vorgeschichte d. Metaphysik, p. 72.

    Google Scholar 

  39. De An., Book III, Ch. 4-8.

    Google Scholar 

  40. We need not discuss within the context of this paper whether ??υς is a ‘transcendental or an immanent power’, cf. De An., 430a, 18 ff together with Nie. Eth., 1178a, 1 and 1178a, 8.

    Google Scholar 

  41. cf. Nic. Eth., particularly 1178a, 12 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Meta., 1072b, 15 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Nic. Eth., 1177a, 11 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Ibid., 1177?, 28.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Ibid., 1177?., 27 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Meta., 1072b, 11 and 1072b, 15-1072b 23.

    Google Scholar 

  47. De An., 431a, I41 431b, 2; 432a, 9 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  48. cf. Meta., 1072b, 15 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  49. De An., 429a, 19.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Ibid., 430a, 15.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Loc. cit.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Op. cit., 418b, 9.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Ibid., 429a, 24 ff, but cf. 430a, 20 and 431a, 2.

    Google Scholar 

  54. hoc. cit.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Op. cit., 429b, 23.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Meta., 1074b, 37.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Ibid., 1075a, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Ibid., 1075a, 2 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Ibid., 1075a, 4.

    Google Scholar 

  60. De An., 430a, 4.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Meta., 1072b, 22.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Ibid., 1072b, 22.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Ibid., 1072b, 24.

    Google Scholar 

  64. cf. Ibid., 1074b, 15 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Ibid., 1074b, 35.

    Google Scholar 

  66. cf. De An., 430a, 2 and Meta., 1075a, 3.

    Google Scholar 

  67. cf. Meta., 981b, 28 ff and 982b, 1 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  68. cf. Ibid., 983a, 5 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Ibid., 1075a, 2 and De An., 430b, 26.

    Google Scholar 

  70. cf. also infra, p. 61 for the later discussion.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Meta., 1072b, 22.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Ibid., 1075a, 5 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Ibid., 1072b, 14 ff, 1072b, 2.4.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Ibid., 1051b, 24.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Ibid., 1051b, 18.

    Google Scholar 

  76. De Int., 16A, 5.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Summa Theologica Qu. 16, Art. 12, Obj. 2, which refers to Isaac Israeli.

    Google Scholar 

  78. But the truth of the thing, in turn, was guaranteed through its own correspon. dentia with the ‘idea’, as conceived by God.

    Google Scholar 

  79. cf. I. Kant, Kritik der Reinen Vernunft, pp. 82, 83, 100, 350.

    Google Scholar 

  80. cf. A. Riezler, Parmenides, p. 15, on the subject of aletheia and the Presocratics particularly.

    Google Scholar 

  81. cf. M. Heidegger, Sein und Zeit, p. 226 ff., on the sense in which ‘Wahrheit ist vorausgesetzt’.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Plato, Meno, 8od, 8.

    Google Scholar 

  83. cf. De An., 430b, 4; Meta., 1051b, 34. (εν μέν έστιν).

    Google Scholar 

  84. De An., 430b, 4: ‘in each and every case that which unifies is ‘Χους’, cf. also 430a, 14 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  85. cf. Meta., 1051b, 3 ff; also De An., 430a, 26 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  86. Meta., 1051b, 7.

    Google Scholar 

  87. cf..M. Heidegger Logos Festschrift fuer H. Jantzen, regarding the original meaning of λέγειν.

    Google Scholar 

  88. De An., 430b, 5.

    Google Scholar 

  89. Meta., 1051b, 35.

    Google Scholar 

  90. cf. Ibid., 1051b, 32; 1052a, 3ff; De An., 430b, 27 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  91. De An., 430a, 26.

    Google Scholar 

  92. Ibid., 430b, 6-20.

    Google Scholar 

  93. Ibid., 432a, 10.

    Google Scholar 

  94. Ibid., 429b, 21.

    Google Scholar 

  95. Ibid., 432a, 14; also 431a, 14; 431b, 13.

    Google Scholar 

  96. Ibid., 429b, 15; Meta., 1051b, 29; 1051b, 33.

    Google Scholar 

  97. De An., 429b, 18 and 430b, 29; also Meta., 1075a, 3.

    Google Scholar 

  98. Meta., 1075a, 3; 1051b, 27.

    Google Scholar 

  99. De An., 429b, 15 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  100. Meta., 1051b, 35.

    Google Scholar 

  101. Ibid., 1051b, 18 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  102. Loc. cit.

    Google Scholar 

  103. cf. De An., 430a, 14, together with 430b, 5 and Meta., 1051b, 35.

    Google Scholar 

  104. Meta., 1051b, 32 and 1052a, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  105. Ibid., 1052a, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  106. De An., 429a, 28; however, as such, they are ‘actual’, cf. Meta., 1051b, 27.

    Google Scholar 

  107. cf. De An., 417b, 22; the episteme of the καδόλου are ‘in a sense within the soul’.

    Google Scholar 

  108. Ibid., 432a, 2 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  109. Ibid., 430a, 15.

    Google Scholar 

  110. Ibid., 430b, 5.

    Google Scholar 

  111. Meta., 1051b, 27

    Google Scholar 

  112. Ibid., 1051b, 35.

    Google Scholar 

  113. De An., 430b, 6 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  114. Ibid., 430, 16.

    Google Scholar 

  115. cf. Meta., 1052a, 5 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  116. Ibid., 1051b, 29.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1954 Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Holland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Marx, W. (1954). The Keyterms. In: The Meaning of Aristotle’s ‘Ontology’. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-9504-1_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-9504-1_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-011-8690-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-9504-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics