Skip to main content

Windup and Directionality Compensation in Nonlinear Model-Based Control

  • Chapter
Nonlinear Model Based Process Control

Part of the book series: NATO ASI Series ((NSSE,volume 353))

Abstract

When a process with actuator saturation nonlinearities is controlled with an analytical (nonmodel predictive) controller, the closed-loop performance may be of low quality due to process directionality and/or windup. This work characterizes these two phenomena and presents (a) an optimal directionality compensator and (b) nonlinear model-based control laws that optimally compensate for process directionality and windup.

Given a controller output, the process directionality compensator calculates an optimal feasible (constrained) plant input that results in a process response as close as possible to the response of the same process to the controller output. The compensator can be used for both linear and nonlinear processes, irrespective of the type of controller being used. The notion of process directionality is defined precisely, and the class of processes that do not exhibit the process directionality are characterized. The performance of the optimal directionality compensator is shown and compared with those of clipping and direction preservation, by linear and nonlinear examples.

The nonlinear model-based control laws include two distinct components: (i) an input-output linearizing controller that inherently include an optimal integral windup compensator and (ii) the optimal directionality compensator. The connections between (a) the derived control laws and (b) model state feedback control and modified internal model control are established. When one of the derived control laws is applied to time-invariant linear processes with a diagonal characteristic matrix, the resulting linear controller is exactly a reduced-order modified internal model controller.

The application and performance of one of the derived control laws are demonstrated by a chemical reactor example.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Åström, K.J. and Rundqwist, L. (1989) Integrator Windup and How to Avoid It, Proc. of ACC, Pittsburgh, PA, 1693.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Barnard, R.D. (1976) Continuous-Time Implementation of Optimal-Aim Controls, IEEE Trans. Auto. Contr., 21, 432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bernstein, D.S. and Michel, A.N. (1995) A Chronological Bibliography on Saturating Actuators, International J. of Robust and Nonlinear Contr., 5 375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Calvet, J.P. and Arkun, Y. (1988) Feedforward and Feedback Linearization of Non-linear Systems and its Implementation Using Internal Model Control, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 27, 1822.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Campo, P.J. and Morari, M. (1990) Robust Control of Processes Subject to Saturation Nonlinearities, Comput. & Chem. Eng., 14, 343.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Coulibaly, E., Maiti, S. and Brosilow, C. (1995) Internal Model Predictive Control (IMPC), Automatica, 31, 1471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Daoutidis, P. and Kravaris, C. (1992) Structural Evaluation of Control Configurations for Multivariable Nonlinear Processes, Chem. Eng. Sci., 47, 1091.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Doyle, J.C., Smith, R.S. and Enns, D.F. (1987) Control of Plants with Input Saturation Nonlinearities, Proc. of ACC, 1034.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hanus, R. and Kinnaert, M. (1989) Control of Constrained Multivariable System Using Conditioning Technique, Proc. of ACC, 1712.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kapoor, N. and Daoutidis, P. (1996) An Observer-based Anti-Windup Scheme for Nonlinear Systems with Input Constraints, International J. of Contr., submitted.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kapoor, N., and Daoutidis, P. (1997) Stabilization of Systems with Input Constraints,” International J. of Contr., 66(5), 653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kendi, T.A. and Doyle, F.J. (1997) An Anti-Windup Scheme for Multivariable Nonlinear Systems, J. of Process Contr., 7(5), 329.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kothare, M.V., Campo, P.J., Morari, M. and Nett, C.N. (1994) A Unified Framework for the Study of Antiwindup Designs, Automatica, 30, 1869.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kurtz, J.M., and Henson, M.A. (1997) Input-Output Linearizing Control of Constrained Nonlinear Processes, J. of Process Contr., 7(1), 3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Mhatre, S. and Brosilow, C. (1996) Multivariable Model State Feedback, Proc. of IFAC World Congress, San Francisco, M, 139.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Oliveira, S.L., Nevistic, V. and Morari, M. (1995) Control of Nonlinear Systems Subject to Input Constraints, Preprints of Nonlinear Control Systems Design Symposium, 15.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Park, J.-K. and Choi, C.-H. (1995) Dynamic Compensation Method For Multivariable Control Systems with Saturating Actuators, IEEE Trans. Auto. Contr., 40(9), 1635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Soroush, M. and Valluri, S. (1997) Calculation of Optimal Feasible Controller Output in Multivariable Processes with Input Constraints, Proc. of ACC, 3475.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Soroush, M. and Kravaris, C. (1992) A Continuous-Time Formulation of Nonlinear Model Predictive Control, Proc. of ACC, Chicago, 1561.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Soroush, M. and Kravaris, C. (1992) Nonlinear Control of a Batch Polymerization Reactor: an Experimental Study, AIChE J., 38, 1429.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Teel, A.R. (1996) A Nonlinear Small Gain Theorem for the Analysis of Control Systems with Saturation, IEEE Thins. Automat. Contr., 41(9), 1256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Valluri, S. (1997) Nonlinear Control of Processes with Actuator Saturations, Ph.D. Thesis, Drexel University, Philadelphia (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Valluri, S. and Soroush, M. (1997) Nonlinear Control of Processes with Actuator Saturation Nonlinearities, submitted to Automatica.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Valluri, S., Soroush, M. and Nikravesh, M. (1997) Shortest-Prediction-Horizon Nonlinear Model Predictive Control, Chem. Eng. Sci., in press.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Walgama, K.S. and Sternby, J. (1993) Conditioning Technique for Multi-Input Multi-Output Processes with Input Saturation, Proc. IEE Part D, 140, 231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zheng, A., Kothare, M.V. and Morari, M. (1994) Anti-Windup Design for Internal Model Control, International J. Contr., 60, 1015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Soroush, M. (1998). Windup and Directionality Compensation in Nonlinear Model-Based Control. In: Berber, R., Kravaris, C. (eds) Nonlinear Model Based Process Control. NATO ASI Series, vol 353. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5094-1_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5094-1_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6140-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-5094-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics