Skip to main content

Highly Efficient Transformation and Regeneration of Transgenic Aspen Plants Through Shoot-Bud Formation in Root Culture, and Transformation of Pinus Halepensis

  • Chapter
Somatic Cell Genetics and Molecular Genetics of Trees

Part of the book series: Forestry Sciences ((FOSC,volume 49))

Abstract

The natural capacity of aspen (Populus tremula) roots for shoot-bud regeneration was harnessed to establish a highly efficient transformation and regeneration procedure which does not require pre-selection with antibiotics. The procedure involved the use of wild type Agrobacterium rhizogenes and uidA (GUS) as the a reporter gene. High transient GUS expression was found in inoculated aspen stem segments, which then formed GUS-expressing adventitious roots. The roots proliferated in liquid culture and formed adventitious shoot buds expressing GUS activity. Kanamycin resistance, resulting from the expression of the nptII gene in the binary plasmid, was confirmed in transformed plants. Specific phenotypic changes in several transgenic aspen plants were monitored. The same A. rhizogenes strain was used for transformation of Pinus halepensis embryos, seedlings and adventitious shoots. Mature embryos were highly susceptible to the Agrobacterium, as detected by transient GUS expression in the radicle. Stable transformation was evidenced by the regeneration of GUS-expressing roots and calli from infected P. halepensis seedlings and adventitious shoots. PCR and Southern blot analyses confirmed the transgenic nature of aspen plants and transformed P. halepensis tissues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Chalupa V (1990) Biotechnology in forest tree improvement: trees of the future. Plant Aging: Basic and Applied Approaches (Rodriguez R, Sánches Tamés R, Duzran DJ eds). Plenum Press, New York, pp. 311–318

    Google Scholar 

  2. Nadel BL, Hazan G, David R, Huttermann A, Altman A (1992) In vitro propagation of Populus species: response to growth regulators and media composition. Acta. Hort. 314: 61–68

    Google Scholar 

  3. Yarnitzki O (1995) Clonal propagation of allepo pine (Pinus halepensis). M. Sc. Thesis (Hebrew with English summary)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Pelah D, Shoseyov O, Altman A (1995) Characterization of BspA, a major boiling-stable, water-stress-responsive protein in aspen (Populus tremula). Tree Physiology 15 (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Klopfenstein NB, Shi NQ, Keman A, McNabb HS, Hall RB, Hart ER, Thornburg RW (1991). Transgenic Populus hybrid expresses a wound-inducible potato proteinase inhibitor II-Cat gene fusion. Can. J. Forest. Res. 21: 1321–1328

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. McCown BH, McCade DE, Russell DR, Robison DJ, Barton KA, Raffa KF (1991) Stable transformation of Populus and incorporation of pest resistance by electric discharge particle acceleration. Plant Cell Rep. 9: 590–594

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Tsai C-J, Hu WJ, Mielke M, Zhang XH, Joshi CP, Podila GK, Chiang VL (1995) Transgenic quaking aspen expressing antisense O-methyltransferase gene. Joint Meeting of the IFURO working parties S.04-07 and S.04-06. Somatic Cell Genetics and Molecular Genetics of Trees. Gent, Belgium (abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Tsai C-J, Podila GK, Chiang VL (1994) Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides) and regeneration of transgenic plants. Plant Cell Rep. 14: 94–97

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Morris JW, Castle LA and Morris RO (1989) Efficacy of different Agrobacterium tumefaciens strains in transformation of pinaceous gymnosperms. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 34: 451–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Stomp A-M, Loopstra C., Chilton WS, Sedroff RR and Moore LW (1990) Extended host range of Agrobacterium tumefaciens in the genus Pinus. Plant Physiol. 92: 1226–1232

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Pomponi M, Spano L, Sabbadini MG, Costantion P (1983) Restriction endonuclease mapping of the root-inducing plasmid of Agrobacterium rhizogenes 1855. Plasmid 10: 119–129

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Vancanneyt G, Schmidt R, O’Connor-Sanchez A, Willmitzer L, Rocha-Sosa M (1990) Construction of an intron-containing marker gene: splicing of the intron in transgenic plants and its use in monitoring early events in Agrobacterium-mediated plant transformation. Mol. Gen. Genet. 220: 245–250

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue culture. Physiol. Plant. 15: 473–497

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Carmi T (1994) Bud differentiation and growth from aspen (Populus tremula) root and bud expiants in liquid cultures. M.Sc. Thesis (Hebrew with English summary)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tzfira T, Ben-Meir H, Vainstein A, Altman A (1995) Highly efficient transformation and regeneration of aspen plants through shoot-bud formation in root culture. Plant Cell Rep. (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Y’aari A (1995) Clonal propagation of allepo pine (Pinus halepensis). M.Sc. Thesis (Hebrew with English summary)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Jefferson RA, Wilson KJ (1991) The GUS gene fusion system. Plant Mol. Biol. Manual B14: 1–33

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ben-Meir H, Vainstein A (1994) Assessment of genetic relatedness in roses by DNA fingerprint analysis. Scien. Hort. 58: 115–121

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Maniatis T, Fritsch EF, Sambrook J (1982) Molecular Cloning. A Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbor, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Klee H, Horsch R, Rogers S (1987) Agrobacterium-mediated plant transformation and its further applications to plant biology. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. 38: 467–486

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Matzke M, Matzke AJM (1993) Genomic imprinting in plants: parental effects and trans-inactivation phenomena. Annu. Rev. Plant. Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 44: 53–76

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Dunstan DI (1988) Prospects and progress in conifer biotechnology. Can. J. For. Res. 2: 1497–1506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Gupta PK and Durzan DJ (1986) Somatic polyembryogenesis from callus of mature sugar pine embryos. Bio/Tech. 4: 643–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tzfira, T., Yarnitzky, O., Vainstein, A., Altman., A. (1996). Highly Efficient Transformation and Regeneration of Transgenic Aspen Plants Through Shoot-Bud Formation in Root Culture, and Transformation of Pinus Halepensis . In: Ahuja, M.R., Boerjan, W., Neale, D.B. (eds) Somatic Cell Genetics and Molecular Genetics of Trees. Forestry Sciences, vol 49. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3983-0_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3983-0_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-5761-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-3983-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics