Skip to main content

Quality policy deployment: the key driver for performance measurement

  • Chapter
Measuring Performance for Business Results

Abstract

QPD is the necessary trigger for processes to perform well and for goals to be achieved. It is the mechanism by which the quality effort is cascaded down throughout the organization. QPD is a top-down approach and as such tends to be the responsibility of senior managers. Process improvement and measurement is a horizontal effort and quality deployment is a vertical (top-down) approach. As Fig. 9.1 illustrates, quality improvement is a continuous effort and as such is not finite. However, quality effects have to be measured and quantified against set targets (Akao, 1990).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Akao, Y. (1990) An introduction to quality function deployment, in Akao, Y. (Ed.) Quality Function Deployment — Integrating Customer Requirements into Product Design, Productivity Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bemowski, K. (1992) Carrying on the P&G tradition, Quality Progress, May, 21–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, P. and Edmonds, T. (1988) Service quality at the Hewlett-Packard Company, in When America Does it Right, Industrial Engineering and Management Press, Norcross, Georgia, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catharine, G.J., and Daniel, M.J. (1991) Customer Satisfaction Through Quality — An International Perspective, The Conference Board of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hronec, S.M. (1993) Vital signs: using quality, time and cost performance measurements to chart your company’s future, AMACOM, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huston, L. A. (1992) Implementing change — executing strategy at Procter and Gamble, Strategic Direction, 84, October, 28–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxton, J. and Locander, W.B. (1991) A systems view of strategic planning at Procter and Gamble, in Stahl, MJ. and Brunds, G.M. (Eds) Competing Globally through Customer Value, Quorum Books, NY.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zairi, M. (1994). Quality policy deployment: the key driver for performance measurement. In: Measuring Performance for Business Results. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1302-1_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1302-1_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-4568-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-1302-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics