Skip to main content

The meaning of performance measurement systems in a quality context

  • Chapter
Measuring Performance for Business Results

Abstract

Measurement is the trigger for improvement. Improvement leads to building strengths, growth and prosperity. It is therefore not very surprising to see that organizations that tried very hard to measure have eventually succeeded in securing commanding positions in the market place. One of the reasons, for instance, why total quality programmes fail is because no measurement took place. The programmes in question were left to their own destiny, ‘as an act of faith’.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Dixon, J.R. et al. (1990) The New Performance Challenge: Measuring Operations for World Class Competition, Homewood, Illinois: Business One Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drury, C. (1990) Cost control and performance measurement in an AMT environment, Management Accounting (UK), November, 40–42, 46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, J.B. (1985) Are management accountants marching towards inevitable decline because of outmoded techniques? Management Accounting (US), September, 45–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldratt, E.M. and Cox, J. (1986) The Goal: A Process of Ongoing Improvement (revised edn), North River Press, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, H.T. and Kaplan, R.S. (1987) Relevance lost: the rise and fall of Management Accounting, Harvard Business School, Boston, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R.S. (1984) Yesterday’s accounting undermines production, Harvard Business Review, July-August, 96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maskell, B. (1989) Performance measurement for World Class Manufacturing, Part 1, Management Accounting, 67(5), 32–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNair, C.J. et al. (1990) Do financial and non-financial performance measures have to agree?, Management Accounting (US), November, 28–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Øvretveit, J (1993) Measuring service quality: practical guidelines, Technical Communications (Publishing) Ltd., Letchworth, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sink, D.S. (1991) The role of measurement in achieving world class quality and productivity management, Industrial Engineering, 23(6) 23–28, 70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, M.C. (1992) Total quality based performance measurement, MBA dissertation, Bradford University Management Centre, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vollman, T.E. (1991) Cutting the Gordian knot of misguided performance measurement, Industrial Management & Data Systems (UK), 91, 24–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zairi, M. (1994). The meaning of performance measurement systems in a quality context. In: Measuring Performance for Business Results. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1302-1_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1302-1_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-4568-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-1302-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics