Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Fundamental Theories of Physics ((FTPH,volume 71))

Abstract

Bell’s theorem is proved to rest on a metatheoretical assumption (MCP) regarding the validity of physical laws that is compatible with the worldview of Classical Physics, not with the worldview of Quantum Physics (QP). A new general principle (MGP) is stated here that is consistent with the basic operational philosophy of QP. By using MGP, which does not modify the observative content of QP, some sample proofs of Bell’s theorem are invalidated. We conclude that the adoption of a more rigorous quantum attitude leads to give up with some features, as nonlocality and noncompatibility with any form of realism, that are usually retained to be unavoidable (and somewhat paradoxical) consequences of QP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bell, J.S. (1964). On the Einstein Podolsky RosenParadox, Phys. Rev 1 (195).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, J.S. (1966). On theProblem of Hidden Variables in Quantum Mechanics, Phys. Rev 38(437).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohm, D. (1951). QuantumTheoryPrentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (N.J.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohm, D. and Aharonov,Y. (1957). Discussion of Experimental Proofs for the Paradox of Einstein, Rosen, and Podolsky, Phys. Rev 108(1070).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Einstein, A., Podolsky,B., Rosen, N. (1935). Can Quantum Mechanical Description of Reality be Considered Complete?, Phys. Rev 47(777).

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Furry, W.H. (1936a).Note on the Quantum-Mechanical Theory of Measurement, Phys. Rev 49(393).

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Furry, W.H. (1936b).Remarks on Measurements in Quantum Theory, Phys. Rev 49 (476).

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Garola, C. (1991).Classical Foundations of Quantum Logic, Int. Journ. of Theor. Phys 30 (1).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Garola, C. (1992a).Semantic Incompleteness of Quantum Physics, Int. Journ. of Theor. Phys 31(809).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Garola, C. (1992b).Quantum Logics Seen as Quantum Testability Theories, Int. Journ. of Theor. Phys 31 (1639).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Garola, C. (1992c).Truth versus Testability in Quantum Logic, Erkenntnis 37 (197).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Garola, C. (1993). Semantic Incompleteness of Quantum Physics and EPR-like Paradoxes, Int. Journ. ofTheor. Phys.,32 (1863).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Garola, C. (1994).Reconciling Local Realism and Quantum Physics: a Critique to Bell, Teoreticheskaya i Matematicheskaya Fizika 99 (285).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Garola, C. (1995a).Criticizing Bell: Local Realism and Quantum Physics Reconciled, to appear in Int. Journ. of Theor. Phys34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garola, C. (1995b).Pragmatical versus Semantical Contextualty in Quantum Physics, to appear in Int. Journ. of Theor. Phys.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberger, D.M.,Horne, M.A., Shimony, A., Zeilinger, A. (1990). Bell’s Theorem without Inequalities, Am. Journ. of Phys.,58(1131).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Mermin, N.D. (1993).Hidden Variables and the Two Teorems of John Bell, Rev. of Mod. Phys 65(803).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K.R. (1969). Conjecturesand RefutationsRoutledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakurai, J.J. (1985). Modern Quantum MechanicsW.A. Benjamin, Reading(Mass.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Selleri, F. (1988). History of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox, in Quantum Mechanics Versus Local Realism (F. Selleri ed.), Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wigner, E.P. (1970). On Hidden Variablesand Quantum Mechanical Probabilities, Am. Journ. of Phys., 38 (1005).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Garola, C. (1995). Questioning Nonlocality: An Operational Critique to Bell’s Theorem. In: Garola, C., Rossi, A. (eds) The Foundations of Quantum Mechanics — Historical Analysis and Open Questions. Fundamental Theories of Physics, vol 71. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0029-8_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0029-8_23

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-4017-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-0029-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics