Skip to main content

Pragmatism, Discourse Ethics and Occasional Philosophy

  • Chapter
Pragmatist Ethics for a Technological Culture

Abstract

Considered as philosophy conceived in response to specific problems, pragmatism is always occasional philosophy. Just as occasional poetry is written for special occasions such as celebrations, commemorations or inaugurations, occasional philosophy is created for circumstances where the audience has a special expectation that configures and shapes what will be done in advance. As I will argue below, the emphasis on problems and specific occasions is one feature that distinguishes pragmatism from other schools of 20th century philosophy. This feature of pragmatism is particularly important to bioethics, for bioethicists frequently find themselves writing and speaking to audiences primed for a particular kind of activity, and with a particular focus and orientation that shapes the philosophy to be done. Keulartz, Korthals, Schermer and Swierstra (Prologue) have provided an essay that frames the specific occasion for each of the essays that follow. They understand contemporary bioethics to involve a series of problems associated with the cumulative impact of industrial technology on global or local ecosystems and on human health.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Benhabib, S. and F. Dallmayer (eds.) (1990). The Communicative Ethics Controversy. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1997). Ethics,Subjectivity and Truth. New York: The New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutmann, A. and D. Thompson (1996). Democracy and Disagreement. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1990). Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. Cambridge: The MIT Press. Habermas, J. (1993). Justifications and Applications. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1998). The Inclusion of the Other: Studies in Political Theory. Cambridge: The MIT Press. Jamieson, D. (2000). “Discourse and Moral Responsibility in Biotechnical Communication”, in: Science and Engineering Ethics 6: 265–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korthals, M. (2000). “Taking Consumers Seriously: Two Concepts of Consumer Sovereignty”, in: Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 14: 201–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDermott, J.J. (1976). The Culture of Experience: Philosophical Essays in the American Grain. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rehg, N. (1994). Insight and Solidarity. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press. Rescher, N. (2000). Realistic Pragmatism: An Introduction to Pragmatic Philosophy. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J.E. (1950). Royce’s Social Infinite: The Community of Interpretation. New York: The Liberal Arts Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, P.B. (1987). “Agricultural Biotechnology and the Rhetoric of Risk: Some Conceptual Issues”, in: The Environmental Professional, 9: 316–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, P.B. (1990). “Biotechnology, Risk and Political Values: Philosophical Rhetoric and the Structure of Political Debate”, in: D.J. Webber (ed.). Biotechnology: Assessing Social Impacts and Policy Implications. New York: Greenwood Press, p. 3–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, P.B. (1995). “Risk and Responsibilities in Modem Agriculture”, in: T.B. Mepham, G.A. Tucker and J. Wiseman (eds.). Issues in Agricultural Bioethics. Nottingham: Nottingham University Press: p. 31–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, P.B. (1997a). Food Biotechnology in Ethical Perspective. London: Chapman and Hall (Blackie Academic and Professional).

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, P.B. (1997b). “Food Biotechnology’s Challenge to Cultural Integrity and Individual Consent”, in: Hastings Center Report, 27(4): 34–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, P.B. (2000a). `Bioethics Issues in a Biobased Economy“, in: A. Eaglesham, W.F. Brown and R.W.F. Hardy (eds.). The Biobased Economy of the 21” Century: Agriculture Expanding into Health

    Google Scholar 

  • Energy, Chemicals and Materials. NABC Report 12. Ithaca: National Agricultural Biotechnology Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, P.B. (2000b). Food and Agricultural Biotechnology: Incorporating Ethical Considerations. Ottowa: Canadian Biotechnology Advisory Committee.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Thompson, P.B. (2002). Pragmatism, Discourse Ethics and Occasional Philosophy. In: Keulartz, J., Korthals, M., Schermer, M., Swierstra, T. (eds) Pragmatist Ethics for a Technological Culture. The International Library of Environmental, Agricultural and Food Ethics, vol 3. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0301-8_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0301-8_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-1115-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-0301-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics