Skip to main content

A Critique of Technological Determinism

  • Chapter
Philosophy and Technology

Part of the book series: Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science ((BSPS,volume 80))

Abstract

During recent decades all industrialized countries have established political institutions and procedures to influence technical development. It would take several pages to list all the ministries of technology, planning authorities, committees on nuclear energy, commissions for astronautics, national boards for automation, offices of technology assessment, and so on, which are expected to control technical development according to social requirements and political goals. To say it in a word: While in former times technics had been reserved to private enterprise, it now ranks among public affairs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anonymous. 1973. Man, Science, Technology. Moscow and Prague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, W. 1978. “Technischer Fortschritt und das Freiheitsverständnis der Liberalen Demokratie,” preprint for the XVIth World Congress of Philosophy. Düsseldorf, pp. 83–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohring, G. 1976. Technik im Kampf der Weltanschauungen. Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenk, H. (ed.). 1973. Technokratie als Ideologic. Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenk, H. and Ropohl, G. 1979. “Toward an Interdisciplinary and Pragmatic Philosophy of Technology,” in P. Durbin (ed.), Research in Philosophy & Technology, vol. 2. Greenwich, Conn., pp. 15 - 52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapp, F. 1978. Analytische Technikphilosophie. Freiburg and Munich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ropohl, G. 1979. Eine Systemtheorie der Technik. Munich and Vienna.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ropohl, G. (ed.). 1981. Interdisziplinare Technikforschung. Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schelsky, H. 1965. “Der Mensch in der wissenschaftlichen Zivilisation,” in H. Schelsky, Auf der Suche nach der Wirklichkeit. Düsseldorf and Cologne, pp. 439–480.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. 1942. Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ullrich, O. 1979. Technik und Herrschaft. Frankfurt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wollgast, S. and Banse, G. 1979. Philosophie und Technik. Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1983 D. Reidel Publishing Company

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ropohl, G. (1983). A Critique of Technological Determinism. In: Durbin, P.T., Rapp, F. (eds) Philosophy and Technology. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 80. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-7124-0_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-7124-0_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-009-7126-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-7124-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics