Skip to main content

Can Government Regulate Technology?

  • Chapter
Philosophy and Technology

Part of the book series: Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science ((BSPS,volume 80))

  • 222 Accesses

Abstract

Recently, while I was in Dijon, France, I happened to be listening to BBC on the radio, and heard a Yorkshire consumer affairs official complaining that the law gave him power only to require that “push-chairs” (baby carriages, or prams) be stable and have reliable brakes, but not to require that their handles not come off. Reacting to an incident of local notoriety, he seemingly felt the need for broader power under law to see to it that Yorkshire mothers be able to use prams as nearly perfect as government regulation could make them.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Calder, N. 1969. Technopolis: Social Control of the Uses of Science. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, R. R. 1974. Food Safety Regulation. Stanford, Cal.: Hoover Institution on War, Revolution and Peace, and Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute for Public Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, R. 1967. 1966. Breakthrough: The Saga of Jonas Salk. New York: Pocket Books Cardinal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, B. 1970, 1959. Profession of Government. London: Unwin University Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowe, B. L. 1969. “The Tragedy of the Commons Revisited.” Science 166 1103–1107 (1969), reprinted in Hardin and Baden 1977, pp. 53–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellul, J. 1969. Histoire des institutions, vol. 5. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellul, J. 1977. Le Systeme technicien. Paris: Calmann-Levy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferkiss, V. C. 1969. Technological Man: The Myth and the Reality. New York: NAL Mentor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, J. D. 1971. The Moral Society. New York: Julian Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grabowski, H. G. 1976. Drug Regulation and Innovation. Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, M. J. (ed.), 1973. The Monopoly Makers. New York: Grossman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, G. 1972, 1968. Exploring New Ethics for Survival. Baltimore: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, G. and Baden, J. (eds.). 1911 .Managing the Commons. San Francisco: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawless, E. W. 1977. Technology and Social Shock. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre, H. 1971, 1967. Vers le Cybernanthrope. Paris: Denoe/Genthier.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCloy, J. J. 1980. “Federal Regulation: Roads to Reform,” ABA Journal 66 461–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintz, M. 1965. The Therapeutic Nightmare. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moynihan, D. P. 1962. ‘The Legal Regulation of Automobile Design,’ in Passenger Car Design and Highway Safety, New York: Association for the Aid of Crippled Children, and Mt. Vernon, N.Y.: Consumers Union of U.S., Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nader, R. 1966. Unsafe at any Speed. New York: Pocket Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neustadt, R. M. 1980. “The Administration’s Regulatory Reform Program: An Overview.” Administrative Law Review 32 129–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neustadt, R. E. and Fineberg, H. V. 1978. The Swine Flu Affair: Decision-Making on a Slippery Disease. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Dept. of Health, Education and Welfare.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connell J. and Myers, A. 1966. Safety Last: An Indictment of the Auto Industry. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • OTA 1978. Congress of the United States. Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of Medical Technologies. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennock, J. R. 1941. Administration and the Rule of Law. New York: Rinehart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rettig, R. A. 1977. Cancer Crusade: The Story of the National Cancer Act of 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Princeton, N.J.: Princeton Univ. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridgeway, J. 1970. The Politics of Ecology. New York: Dutton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, M. 1978. The Technological Conscience. New York: Macmillan, Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strong, A. L. 1971. Private Property and the Public Interest: The Brandy wine Experience. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Till, I. 1973. “The Legal Monopoly,” in Green 1973, pp. 289–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin, H. A. Jr. 1939. Patents and the Public Interest. New York/London: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Wynen, A. and Thomas A. J. Jr. 1970. Legal Limits on the Use of Chemical and Biological Weapons, Dallas: Southern Methodist University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. R. 1963. Margin of Safety. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1983 D. Reidel Publishing Company

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Byrne, E. (1983). Can Government Regulate Technology?. In: Durbin, P.T., Rapp, F. (eds) Philosophy and Technology. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 80. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-7124-0_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-7124-0_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-009-7126-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-7124-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics