Skip to main content

Justice and the Hippocratic Tradition of Acting for the Good of the Sick

  • Chapter
Ethics and Critical Care Medicine

Part of the book series: Philosophy and Medicine ((PHME,volume 19))

Abstract

In this paper I will examine whether the construction of a just system of health care is impeded or assisted by a Hippocratic tradition, the duty of beneficence. It will be argued that it is an important part of a just system of health care that seeks empathy, and equity as well as impartiality. In the first section the charges that the duty of beneficence promotes unwarranted partiality and paternalism are examined. It is found that this tradition understood as a prima facie or imperfect duty of beneficence, neither entails nor fosters unwarranted paternalism and that this moral duty may be important to a just system. Partiality, for example, when it results in empathetic care, may be defensible in a just system. In the second section the reason why this kind of duty may be important in a just system is explored. Providing care for individuals, rather than thinking of what faceless members of some group need, encourages personal regard and discretion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. American Medical Association: 1982, ‘Principles of Medical Ethics’, in T. L. Beauchamp and L. Walters (eds.), Contemporary Issues in Bioethics, 2nd Edition, Wadsworth Publishing Company, Belmont, California, p. 122.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aristotle: Nicomachean Ethics.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Benfield, D. G., Leib, S. A., and Vollman, J. H.: 1978, ‘Grief Response of Parents to Neonatal Death and Parental Participation in Deciding Care’, Pediatrics 62: 2, 171–177.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Benn, S. I.: 1967, ‘Justice’, in P. Edwards (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Vol. 1, Macmillan, New York, pp. 298–300.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bondy, P. K.: 1981, ‘Medical Care Insurance vs. A National Health Service: Impact on the Patterns of Medical Practice’, Clinical Research 29, 389–395.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Canterbury v. Spence, 464 F2d, 772, (D.C.C.:, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cooke, R. E.: 1972, ‘Whose Suffering?’ J. Pediatrics 80, 906–908.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chisholm, R.: 1958, ‘Sentences About Believing’, in H. Feigl et. al. (eds.), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. III. pp. 510–520.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Duff, R. S. and Campbell, A. G. M.: 1976, ‘On Deciding the Care of Severely Handi-capped or Dying Persons: With Particular Reference to Infants’, Pediatrics 57, 487–492.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Duff, R. S. and Campbell, A. G. M.: 1973, ‘Moral and Ethical Dilemmas in the Special-Care Nursery’, New England Journal of Medicine 289, 890–894.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Duff, R. S.: 1981, ‘Counseling Families and Deciding Care of Severely Defective Children: A Way of Coping with Medical Vietnam’, Pediatrics 67: 3, 315–320.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Edelstein, L.: 1967, Ancient Medicine, edited by O. Temkin and C. L. Temkin, Johns Hockins Press, Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

  13. English, P.: 1985, ‘Commentary on Stanley J. Reiser’s ‘Critical Care in an Historical Context’, in this volume, pp. 225–230.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Evtushenko, E. 1983, ‘Empathy: A Rare Gift’, L. Beraha (tr.), Forward to A. Platanov, Fierce, Fine World. Compiled by M. Platonov, Radrega Publishers, Moskow, pp. 7–11.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fein, R.: 1982, ‘What is Wrong with the Language of Medicine’, New England Journal of Medicine 306, 863–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Feinberg, J.: 1973, Social Philosophy, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Fost, N.: 1981, ‘Counseling Families Who Have a Child with a Severe Congenital Anomaly’, Pediatrics 67: 321–234.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Frader, J. E.: 1979, ‘Difficulties in Providing Intensive Care’, Pediatrics 64: 1, 10–11.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Freeman, J. M.:1972, ‘Is There a Right to Die — Quickly?’ J. Pediatrics, 80,904–905.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Freud, S.: 1959, Group Psychology and the Analysis of the Ego, J. Strackey (tr.) The Hogarth Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hippocratic Oath’, reprinted in S. J. Reiser, A. J. Dyck, and W. J. Curran, Ethics in Medicine, M.I.T. Press, Cambridge and London 1977, p. 121.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hume, D.: 1751, An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Katz, J.: 1985, ‘Can Principles Survive in Situations of Critical Care’, in this volume, pp. 41–67.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Katz, J.: 1978, ‘Informed Consent in the Therapeutic Relationship’, in W. Reich (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Bioethics, Vol. 2, Free Press, New York, pp. 770–778.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ladd, J.: 1976, ‘Are Science and Ethics Compatible?’ in H.T. Engelhardt and D. Callahan (eds.), Science, Ethics and Medicine, The Hastings Center, Hastings, New York, pp. 49–78.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Locke, J.: 1690, Second Treatise of Civil Government.

    Google Scholar 

  27. May, W. F.: 1983, The Physician’s Covenant: Images of the Healer in Medical Ethics, The Westminster Press, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Margolis, J.: 1984, ‘Applying Moral Theory to the Retarded’, in L. Kopelman and J. C. Moskop (eds.), Ethics and Mental Retardation, D. Reidel Publ. Co., Dordrecht, Holland, pp. 19–35.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Margolis, J.: 1985, ‘Triage and Critical Care’, in this volume, pp. 171–189.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Milgram, S.: 1974, Obedience to Authority, Harper and Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Nozick, R.: 1974, Anarchy, State and Utopia, Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Pellegrino, E. D.: 1985, ‘Moral Choice, The Good of the Patient, and the Patient’s Good’, in this volume, pp. 117–138.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Pellegrino, E. D.: 1979, Humanism and the Physician, The University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Pence, G. E.: 1983, ‘Can Compassion Be Taught?’ Journal of Medical Ethics 9, 189–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Rawls, J.: 1955, ‘Two Concepts of Rules’, Philosophical Review 64, 3–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Rawls, J.: 1971, A Theory of Justice, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Robertson, J. A.: 1975, ‘Involuntary Euthanasia of Defective Newborns: A Legal Analysis’, Stanford Law Review 27, 213–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Rothman, D. J.: 1983, ‘Who Speaks for the Retarded?’ in L. Kopelman and J. C. Moskop (eds.), Ethics and Mental Retardation, D. Reidel Publ. Co., Dordrecht, Holland, pp. 223–233.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Rothman, D. J. and Rothman, S. M.: 1980, ‘The Conflict Over Children’s Rights’, Hastings Center Report 10: 3, 7–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Rousseau, J. J.: 1750, The Social Contract.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Sade,R. M.: 1971, ‘Medical Care as a Right: A Refutation’, New England Journal of Medicine 285, 1288–1292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Shaw, A., Randolph, J. G. and Manard, B.: 1977, ‘Ethical Issues in Pediatric Surgery: A National Survey of Pediatricians and Pediatric Surgeons’, Pediatrics 60: 4, Part 2, 588–599.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Superintendent of Belcher town v. Saikewicz, 370 N.E..2d, 417 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Todras, I. D., Krane, D., Howell, M. C., and Shanon, D. C.: 1977, ‘Pediatricians’ Attitudes Affecting Decision-Making in Defective Newborns’, Pediatrics 60: 2, 197–201.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Toulmin, S.: 1981, ‘The Tyranny of Principles’, Hastings Center Report 11: 6, 31–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Veatch, R. M.: 1985, ‘The Ethics of Critical Care in Cross-Cultural Perspective’, in this volume, pp. 191–206.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Veatch, R. M.: 1981, A Theory of Medical Ethics, Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  48. U.S., 45 CFR Part 84, Office of the Secretary: January 12, 1984, ‘Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Handicap: Procedures and Guidelines Relating to Health Care for Handicapped Infants’ DHHS, Federal Register, 1622–1653.

    Google Scholar 

  49. U.S., President’s Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medical and Behavioral Research: 1983, Deciding to Forego Life Saving Treatment, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Weil, S.: 1970, First and Last Notebooks, R. Rees (tr. ), Oxford University Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Wikler, D.: 1983, ‘Paternalism and Coercion’, in R. Sartorius (ed.), Paternalism, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp. 35–39.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1985 D. Reidel Publishing Company

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kopelman, L. (1985). Justice and the Hippocratic Tradition of Acting for the Good of the Sick. In: Moskop, J.C., Kopelman, L. (eds) Ethics and Critical Care Medicine. Philosophy and Medicine, vol 19. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5233-1_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5233-1_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-8814-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-5233-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics