Abstract
Although special in many ways, the EDB (ethyl dibromide) case illustrates the problems that regulatory agencies have when they must take regulatory action and assure the public that the risks in question have been dealt with adequately. It also illustrates issues that the press faces. Above all, it illustrates the barriers to communication presented by the different perspectives of regulatory agencies and individuals as well as the type of information each are most interested in.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
National Research Council. Committee on the Institutional Means for Assessment of Risks to Public Health, Commission on Health Sciences, Risk Assessment in the Federal Government: Managing the Process. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 1983.
Otway, Harry and Thomas, Kerry. ‘Reflections on Risk Perception and Policy,’ Risk Analysis, 1982,2,69–82.
Sharlin, Harold Issadore. ‘EDB: A Case Study in the Communication of Health Risk,’ Unpublished report submitted to Derry Allen, Associate Director, Office of Policy Analysis, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, January 9,1985.
Twentieth Century Fund. Report of the Twentieth Century Fund Task Force on Communication of Scientific Risk, Science in the Streets. New York: Priority Press, 1984.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1987 D. Reidel Publishing Company
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sharlin, H.I. (1987). Macro-Risks, Micro-Risks, and the Media: The EDB Case. In: Johnson, B.B., Covello, V.T. (eds) The Social and Cultural Construction of Risk. Technology, Risk, and Society, vol 3. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3395-8_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3395-8_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-8021-7
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-3395-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive