Skip to main content

Artificial Intelligence

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of the Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy

Introduction: A Bit of History

The first scholarly inquiries into artificial intelligence (“AI”) date back to 1943 and are linked to the work of Warren McCulloch and Walter Pitts in the United States (Russell and Norvig 2010, p. 16). However, the first use of the expression “artificial intelligence” occurred in 1956, when it was adopted by John McCarthy, during a lecture at the Dartmouth College in Hanover, New Hampshire (Kaplan 2016, p. 13). Many other papers about the subject were published in the following years, as described by Nilsson (2009, pp. 71–85).

It is worth discussing the “Turing test” – also known as the “imitation game” (Turing 1950, pp. 433–460). In 1950, Alan Turing designed a test to identify whether a machine evolved to the point that it would be able to produce results indistinguishable from the results produced by human actions. A machine that can pass this test could be, according to Turing, called “intelligent.” Despite its historical importance, the Turing test...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Balkin JM (2017) The three laws of robotics in the age of big data. Yale Law School research paper no 592, p 01-28, Yale Law School – New Haven, Connecticut. August 2017

    Google Scholar 

  • Bostrom N (2014) Superintelligence: paths, dangers, strategies. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Brynjolfsson E, McAfee A (2016) The second machine age: work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies. Norton & Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Calo R (2017) Artificial intelligence policy: a primer and roadmap. University of Washington research paper 01-28. University of Washington Law School – Washington, DC. August 2017

    Google Scholar 

  • Casey AJ, Niblett A (2017) The death of rules and standards. Indiana Law J 92(4):1.401–1.447. Bloomington: Maurer School of Law

    Google Scholar 

  • Cath C et al (2017) Artificial intelligence and the ‘good society’: the US, EU, and UK approach. Sci Eng Ethics 23(2):1–24. New York: Springer

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes P, Ford K (1995) Turing test considered harmful. In: Proceedings of the 14th international joint conference on Artificial intelligence – IJCAI-95, vol 1. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Montreal, pp 972–977

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan J (2016) Artificial intelligence: what everyone needs to know. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurzweil R (2005) The singularity is near: when humans transcend biology. Penguin Group, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson NJ (2009) The quest for artificial intelligence: a history of ideas and achievements. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Remus D, Levy F (2016) Can robots be lawyers? Computers, lawyers, and the practice of law. Massachusetts Institute of Technology research paper 01-77. Massachusetts Institute of Technology – Cambridge, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell SJ, Norvig P (2010) Artificial intelligence: a modern approach, 3rd edn. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Sample I, Hern A (2014) Scientists dispute whether computer ‘Eugene Goostman’ passed Turing test. The Guardian, 9 June

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer MU (2016) Regulating artificial intelligence systems: risks, challenges, competencies and strategies. Harv J Law Technol 29(2):353–400. Cambridge: Harvard Law School

    Google Scholar 

  • Solum LB (1992) Legal personhood for artificial intelligences. N C Law Rev 70(4):1.231–1.288. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina School of Law

    Google Scholar 

  • Susskind R (2013) Tomorrow’s lawyers: an introduction to your future. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Turing AM (1950) Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind 49:433–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman EJ (2016) Machine minds: frontiers in legal personhood. University of Chicago working paper 01-41. University of Chicago Law School – Chicago, Illinois

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leonardo Parentoni .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature B.V.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Parentoni, L. (2020). Artificial Intelligence. In: Sellers, M., Kirste, S. (eds) Encyclopedia of the Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6730-0_745-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6730-0_745-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-007-6730-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-007-6730-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Law and CriminologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics