Abstract
This Teacher’s Guide of implementation strategies for Model Eliciting Activities (MEAs) was developed through a collaboration between an 8th grade mathematics teacher and a university partner who served as one of the “clients” during four week-long MEAs in the 2006–2007 school year. The guide provides principles which may be useful to teachers and researchers who wish to conduct investigations of students’ or teachers’ actions during modeling activities in middle grades or other contexts. Neither the mathematics teacher nor this Guide’s collaborator had had prior experience with MEAs. Thirty-two 8th grade students from a magnet school in an urban U.S. district took part in these activities. They were combined from two classes: one regular mathematics class and one special education class. The heart of this Guide comes from reflections by the regular mathematics teacher explored during a May, 2007 interview with the first author who was also one of the university partners. From these experiences, four strategic categories emerged: (1) Group composition, (2) Relevant MEA selection, (3) Teachers’ roles during group work, and, (4) Culminating group presentations and individual written work. During the activities, both the regular and special education teacher observed active engagement by several students who previously rarely participated in mathematics class.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Before the Bigfoot problem, the teachers anticipated that students might want to measure body parts. Teachers assigned students to single-gender groups, because they wanted to minimize middle grade students awkward feelings.
We am following Rowland’s (2000) use of “rules” to refer to the regularities of interaction that point to a collection of implicit norms of behavior and speech that members of a speech community use while engaging in interactions. This is not meant to imply these rules are mandatory (in fact they are often made visible when they are broken) or that these rules are to be interpreted as normative judgments of what students ought to do.
References
Blum, W., Galbraith, P. L., Henn, H., and Niss, M. (Eds.) (2007). Modelling and Applications in Mathematics Education: The 14th ICMI Study. New York: Springer.
Lesh, R. A., Hamilton, E., and Kaput, J. J. (Eds.) (2007). Foundations for the Future in Mathematics Education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Lesh, R., and Doerr, H. M. (2003). Beyond Constructivism: Models and Modeling Perspectives on Mathematics Problem Solving, Learning, and Teaching. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Kelly, E. A, and Lesh, R. A. (Eds.) (2000). Handbook of Research Design in Mathematics and Science Education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Ackowledgments
Thank you to the 8th grade students who enthusiastically participated in these Model Eliciting Activities. Our sincere thanks go to Mrs. Linda Hunt, school mathematics specialist and this project’s manager, for her timely direction to keep the activities running smoothly. Thank you also to Dr. Keith Bowman for his measured insights. Essential to these efforts was Principal Kathleen Bandolik’s support. We recognize the collaborating special education teacher, Ms. Clare Hourican, for her shared role in this work amidst her many teaching demands. And a special note of gratitude to Dr. Judith Zawojewski for her invitation to the first author to engage in this worthwhile project.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendices
Appendix 1 Fun on the Field: Model Eliciting Activity
Problem: | Student | 100 Meter Run | 800 Meter Run | High jump | Fitness test |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Use the data here to develop a method to split the | Betsy | 17.3 s | 3 min 38 s | 5’3” | Pass |
6th grade class into three equal teams. Write a | Caroline | 16.0 s | 3 min 1 s | 3’5” | Fail |
letter to the Organizers of the Fitness Field Day | Daniel | 19.89 s | 2 min 42 s | 5’5” | Pass |
explaining the method you used to divide the | Dick | 18.52 s | 2 min 55 s | 4’4” | Pass |
class. The Organizers will use your method for | Jason | 16.48 s | 2 min 55 s | 3’9” | Pass |
other grade levels and for the annual local-level | Judi | 17.2 s | 3 min 22 s | 3’6” | Fail |
competition among all district schools, where | Lupita | 20.2 s | 4 min 0 s | 5’0” | Pass |
they will need to divide a large number of players | Mack | 18.25 s | 3 min 16 s | 5’6” | Pass |
into equal teams. | Manuel | 17.1 s | 3 min Iis | 4’2” | Fail |
Margret | 20.32 s | 2 min 51 s | 5’7” | Pass | |
Michelle | 16.44 s | 2 min 45 s | 4’5” | Fail | |
Rob | 19.2 s | 3 min 12 s | 4’10” | Fail | |
Sandra | 17.34 s | 3 min 50 s | 5’ 1’ | Fail | |
Scott | 17.0 s | 3 min 30 s | 4’ii” | Pass | |
Susan | 18.3 s | 3 min 0 s | 5’3” | Pass |
*Students either passed or failed the fitness test, which included 30 push ups, 50 jumping jacks, and 20 sit-ups
Appendix 2 Paper Airplane Model Eliciting Activity
Beginner competition problem | Straight path | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
In past competitions, the judges have had problems deciding how to select a winner for each of the four awards (Most Accurate, Best Floater, Best Boomerang, and Best Overall). | Team | Amount of time Length of throw Distance from in air (seconds) (meters) target (meters) | ||
The judges don’t know which measurements to consider from | Team 1 | 3.1 | 11 | 1.8 |
each path to determine who wins each award. Your team is | 0.1 | 1.5 | 8.7 | |
being asked to consider how to use the measurements for the | 2.7 | 7.6 | 4.5 | |
Beginner Competition only. Recall that the Beginner | Team 2 | 3.8 | 10.9 | 1.7 |
Competition involves only a straight throw; so Best Boomerang | 4.2 | 13.1 | 5.4 | |
is not an option. Some sample data from last year will be | 1.7 | 3.4 | 8.1 | |
provided. Write a memo to the judges of the contest. In your | Team 3 | 4.2 | 12.6 | 4.5 |
memo include procedures to determine Most Accurate. Best | 5.1 | 14.9 | 6.7 | |
Floater. and Best Overall. Within the procedure. clearly State | 3.7 | 11.3 | 3.9 | |
the reason for each step. heuristic (i.e. rule). or consideration in | Team 4 | 2.3 | 7.3 | 3.3 |
your procedure. Use your procedure and the sample data | 2.7 | 9.1 | 4.9 | |
provided to determine the winners in each category. Make a | 0.2 | 1.6 | 9.1 | |
note of the winners but do not include this in your memo. | Team 5 | 4.9 | 7.9 | 2.8 |
2.5 | 10.8 | 1.7 | ||
5.1 | 12.8 | 5.7 |
Sample data table for beginner competition
Appendix 3 The “Big Foot” Model Eliciting Activity
Monrovia Someone who lives in this small rural Illinois town just outside of Chicago cares about the town’s children. While most residents will do anything for the children, from volunteering for tutoring at the elementary school to umpiring the children’s baseball league, one resident went beyond the call of duty by fixing and repainting the playground equipment. Where there is no problem in making sure the equipment is in good shape, the problem is finding out which resident took the time and resources to fix the equipment. Park District Superintendent Ruth Spears would like to thank the person. Spears said the park district would like to thank the person who replaced the chains on the swings, repaired missing or loose boards on the merry-go-round and repainted the monkey bars and swings. “They didn’t have to do that, but we thank them and we would like to honor them,” Spears said.
Monrovia town marshal Samuel Rose first noticed the new park equipment when he and police officer Reggie Perkins were called to the town park around 11 p.m. on Monday when neighboring residents reported funny noises, such as rattling chains, nailing of wood and other sounds associated with repairs. “We saw the subject’s shadow as he was leaving the park,” said Rose. “We did not get a clear look at the person, so we have no idea what the person looked like.” Officer Perkins, upon further investigation of the repaired and repainted equipment, noticed footprints around the swings, the merry-go-round and the monkey bars. “That is really the only clue we have to go by at this point in the identification process,” said Perkins. Rose, along with Spears, said that no charges would be filed against the Good Samaritan. “We’re just happy we have a resident who is willing to help the community,” said Rose. “I just wish we knew who they were.”
Readiness questions:
What is the problem in Monrovia?
Who is Ruth Spears?
Why does Ruth Spears want to contact this mysterious person?
Who first noticed the new park equipment?
What evidence did the mysterious person leave behind?
How can Ruth Spears identify this person?
The Problem: Sometime late last night, some nice person rebuilt the old brick drinking fountain in the park. The mayor wants to thank the person who did it. But nobody saw who it was. All the police could find were lots of footprints. One of the footprints is shown here. [Note: Students were given a cutout of a 22 inch footprint]
The person who made this footprint seems to be very big. But, to find this person, we need to figure out how big he or she probably is. Your job is to make a “HOW TO” direction sheet (i.e., a set of step-by-step directions) that the police can use to figure out how big people are just by looking at their footprints. Your direction sheet should work for footprints like the one that is shown here, but it also should work for other footprints.
Appendix 4
Photograph accompanying Tom Thumb Gardens Model Eliciting Activity
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Leavitt, D.R., Ahn, C.M. (2013). A Middle Grade Teacher’s Guide to Model Eliciting Activities. In: Lesh, R., Galbraith, P., Haines, C., Hurford, A. (eds) Modeling Students' Mathematical Modeling Competencies. International Perspectives on the Teaching and Learning of Mathematical Modelling. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6271-8_30
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6271-8_30
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-6270-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-6271-8
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)