Skip to main content

Modeling Discourse in Secondary Science and Mathematics Classrooms

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Modeling Students' Mathematical Modeling Competencies

Abstract

This paper describes the structure of student-student and teacher-student discourse in four different classrooms in which modeling instruction was employed and it highlights characteristic features of this discourse. I describe the roles students adopt during whiteboard-mediated discourse and the ways in which these roles shape student reasoning and engagement in these very different learning communities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Brown, J. S., Collins, A., and Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, P. (2002). Reasoning with tools and inscriptions. Journal ofthe Learning Sciences, 11(2/3), 187–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doerr, H. M., and Tripp, J. S. (1999). Understanding how students develop mathematical models. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 1(3), 231–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hestenes, D. (1987). Toward a modeling theory of physics instruction. American Journal of Physics, 55(5), 440–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollan, J., Hutchins, E., and Kirsch, D. (2000). Distributed cognition: Toward a new foundation for human-computer interaction research. ACM Transactions on Human Computer Interactions, 7(2), 174–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking Science: Language, Learning and Values. Westport, CT: Ablex Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Megowan, C. (2007). Framing discourse for optimal learning in science and mathematics. AZ, Tempe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W.-M., and McGinn, M. K. (1998). Inscriptions: Toward a theory of representing as social practice. Review of Educational Research, 68(1), 35–59.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The research reported in this paper was supported, in part, by grants from the National Science Foundation (#0337795 and #0312038). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Colleen Megowan-Romanowicz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Megowan-Romanowicz, M.C. (2013). Modeling Discourse in Secondary Science and Mathematics Classrooms. In: Lesh, R., Galbraith, P., Haines, C., Hurford, A. (eds) Modeling Students' Mathematical Modeling Competencies. International Perspectives on the Teaching and Learning of Mathematical Modelling. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6271-8_29

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics