Abstract
This chapter reflects on the evolution of the mathematics of change and variation as technology affords the possibility of conceptualizing and communicating ideas for a wider range of learners than the few who traditionally study the higher levels of calculus. It considers the overall program of development conceived by Jim Kaput, instantiated in the SimCalc software as part of a full range of development using technology for “expressing, communicating, reasoning, computing, abstracting, generalizing, and formalizing” mathematical ideas (Kaput and Roschelle, this volume, p. 13). The development begins with interactive representations of dynamic real-world situations and extends the perceptual ideas of continuity and linearity through the operational symbolism of calculus and on to the formalizing power of mathematical analysis. It reveals that the Kaput program has the distinction that its overall framework contains the essence for continuing the complementary evolution of technology and the conceptions of mathematical change and variation. Furthermore, it envisages changes that we have, as yet, not implemented, such is the speed of technological change. In particular, new technology enables us not only to build more powerful ways of performing numerical and symbolic algorithms that may be represented visually and dynamically, it also provides new forms of input and gesture to offer an embodied, kinesthetic, and emotionally powerful experience of engaging with mathematics. This can be shared widely through fundamental human perception and action, and can develop in the longer term through symbolism and human reason to the mathematical literacy required of today’s citizens, the theoretical applications of mathematics essential for today’s society, and on to the boundaries of mathematical research that takes us into the future.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Baroody, A. J., & Costlick, R. T. (1998). Fostering children’s mathematical power: an investigative approach to K-8 mathematics instruction. Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Fleming, D., & Kaput, J. (1979). Calculus with analytic geometry. New York: Harper & Row.
Gates, B. (2010, January 10). There’s nothing on iPad I look at and say, ‘Oh, I wish Microsoft had done it.’ MacDailyNews. http://macdailynews.com/2010/02/10/bill_gates_nothing_on_ipad_i_look_at_and_say_oh_i_wish_msft_had_it/.
Harel, G., & Kaput, J. J. (1991). The role of conceptual entities in building advanced mathematical concepts and their symbols. In D. O. Tall (Ed.), Advanced mathematical thinking (pp. 82–94). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
Kaput, J. J. (1992). Technology and mathematics education. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook on research in mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 515–556). New York: Macmillan.
Lima, R. N., & Tall, D. O. (2008). Procedural embodiment and magic in linear equations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 67(1), 3–18.
McGowen, M. C., & Tall, D. O. (2010). Metaphor or met-before? The effects of previous experience on the practice and theory of learning mathematics. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 29(3), 169–179.
Skemp, R. R. (1979). Intelligence, learning, and action. London: Wiley.
Tall, D. O. (1981). Elementary axioms and pictures for infinitesimal calculus. Bulletin of the IMA, 18, 43–48.
Tall, D. O. (1985). Understanding the calculus. Mathematics Teaching, 110, 49–53.
Tall, D. O. (1986). A graphical approach to integration and the fundamental theorem. Mathematics Teaching, 113, 48–51.
Tall, D. O. (1989). Concept images, generic organizers, computers and curriculum change. For the Learning of Mathematics, 9(3), 37–42.
Tall, D. O. (2006). Developing a theory of mathematical growth. International Reviews on Mathematical Education (ZDM), 39(1–2), 145–154.
Tall, D. O. (2009). Dynamic mathematics and the blending of knowledge structures in the calculus. ZDM—The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 41(4), 481–492.
Tall, D. O. (2012, in press). A sensible approach to the calculus. In F. Pluvinage & A. Cuevas (Eds.), Handbook on calculus and its teaching. http://www.warwick.ac.uk/staff/David.Tall/downloads.html.
Tall, D. O. (2013). How humans learn to think mathematically. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Tall, D. O., Gray, E. M., Ali, M. B., Crowley, L. F., DeMarois, P., McGowen, M. C., Pitta, D., Pinto, M. M. F., Thomas, M. O. J., & Yusof, Y. (2001). Symbols and the bifurcation between procedural and conceptual thinking. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 1(1), 81–104.
Van Hiele, P. M. (1986). Structure and insight. Orlando: Academic Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tall, D. (2013). The Evolution of Technology and the Mathematics of Change and Variation: Using Human Perceptions and Emotions to Make Sense of Powerful Ideas. In: Hegedus, S., Roschelle, J. (eds) The SimCalc Vision and Contributions. Advances in Mathematics Education. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5696-0_25
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5696-0_25
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-5695-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-5696-0
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)