Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Boston Studies in Philosophy, Religion and Public Life ((BSPR,volume 1))

  • 1037 Accesses

Abstract

In recent years, efforts have been made to create a new norm in international affairs stating that victorious states have an obligation to rebuild those whom they have defeated in war. This chapter challenges the arguments put forward in favor of this norm, showing that they rest on four false assumptions concerning: the alleged post-bellum nature of the rebuilding process; the supposed justice of the wars waged by liberal democratic states; the compatibility of the obligation to rebuild with the Western just war tradition; and the ability of states to successfully rebuild their defeated enemies. The chapter concludes that the practical application of the norm would be counterproductive, as it would serve mainly to allow states which have waged unjust wars to continue unjust occupations of conquered territories.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    I have outlined this position in more detail in an analysis of the work of Russian philosopher Ivan Il’in: Robinson (2003).

References

  • Aikins M (2010) Last stand in Kandahar. In: The Walrus, December 2010. http://www.walrusmagazine.com/articles/2010.12-international-affairs-last-stand-in-kandahar/. Accessed 22 Nov 2010

  • Amin AR (1990) The sovietization of Afghanistan. In: Klass R (ed) Afghanistan: the great game revisited. Freedom House, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass GJ (2004) Jus post bellum. Philos Public Aff 32(4):403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellamy A (2008) The responsibilities of victory: Jus post bellum and the just war. Rev Int Stud 34(4):620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coady CAJ(T) (2011) The just post bellum. In: Tripodi P, Wolfendale J (eds) New wars and new soldiers: military ethics in the contemporary world. Ashgate, Farnham

    Google Scholar 

  • Elshtain JB (2007) Exit or no exit? Jean Bethke Elshtain’s response. In: Dissent, 2 May. http://www.dissentmagazine.org/online. Accessed 22 Nov 2010

  • Elshtain JB (2008) The ethics of fleeing: what America still owes Iraq. World Aff 170(4):96

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans M (2009) Moral responsibilities and the conflicting demands of Jus post bellum. Ethics Int Aff 23(2):154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gheciu A, Welsh J (2009) The imperative to rebuild: assessing the normative case for postconflict reconstruction. Ethics Int Aff 23(2):124

    Google Scholar 

  • Harakas S (1986) The N.C.C.B. Pastoral letter, the challenge of peace: an eastern orthodox response. In: Reid CJ Jr (ed) Peace in a nuclear age: the Bishops’ pastoral letter in perspective. Catholic University of America Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Iasiello LV (2004) The moral responsibilities of victors in war. Naval War College Rev 57(3/4):42

    Google Scholar 

  • International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty (2001) The responsibility to protect. ICISS, Ottawa

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson R (2008) Jus post bellum and counterinsurgency. J Military Ethics 7(3):216

    Google Scholar 

  • Kern PB (1999) Ancient siege warfare. Indiana University Press, Bloomington/Indianapolis

    Google Scholar 

  • Laber J (1980) Afghanistan’s other war. New York Rev Books 33(2)

    Google Scholar 

  • McCready D (2009) Ending the war right: Jus post bellum and the just war tradition. J Military Ethics 8(1):68

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyo D (2009) Dead aid: why aid is not working and how there is a better way for Africa. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Orend B (2002) Justice after war. Ethics Int Aff 16(1):47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orend B (2007) Jus post bellum: the perspective of a just war theorist. Leiden J Int Law 20(3):581

    Google Scholar 

  • Pape R (2005) Dying to win: the strategic logic of suicide terrorism. Random House, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Peceny M, Pickering J (2006) Can liberal intervention build liberal democracy. In: Mason T, Meernik J (eds) Conflict prevention and peacebuilding in post-war societies. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichberg GM, Syse H, Begby E (2006) The ethics of war: classic and contemporary readings. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson P (2003) On resistance to evil by force: Ivan Il’in and the necessity of war. J Military Ethics 2(2):145–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson P, Dixon J (2010) Soviet development theory and economic and technical assistance to Afghanistan. Historian 72(3):620–623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodin D (2008) The moral inequality of soldiers: why jus in Bello asymmetry is half right. In: Rodin D, Shue H (eds) Just and unjust warriors: the moral and legal status of soldiers. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Shroder JF Jr, Assifi AT (1990) Afghan resources and soviet exploitation. In: Klass R (ed) Afghanistan: the great game revisited. Freedom House, Lanham

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart R (2009) Afghanistan: what could work. In: The New York review of books, 17 Dec. http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2010/jan/14/afghanistan-what-could-work/. Accessed 10 Nov 2010

  • Walzer M (1992) Just and unjust wars: a moral argument with historical illustrations, 2nd edn. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul Robinson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Robinson, P. (2013). Is There an Obligation to Rebuild?. In: MacLachlan, A., Speight, A. (eds) Justice, Responsibility and Reconciliation in the Wake of Conflict. Boston Studies in Philosophy, Religion and Public Life, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5201-6_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics