Skip to main content

Direct and Indirect, Impressional and Reproductive, Consciousness

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Philosophy of Edmund Husserl

Part of the book series: Phaenomenologica ((PHAE,volume 207))

  • 1606 Accesses

Abstract

Where manners of givenness are concerned, there is not only that between clarity and obscurity, but also, to begin with, that between direct and indirect and indirect consciousness in which one object is intended “through” another. Seeing a photograph is direct but the consciousness of the depicted object is indirect. In perceiving, the object is there in person and in recollecting, which is also direct, the object is formerly there in person, non-original but still direct. In perceiving a box, one side is directly presented and the other sides are directly appresented. And there are fictive versions of these.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Chapter 3.

  2. 2.

    Cf. pp. 61ff.

  3. 3.

    See p. 47ff.

  4. 4.

    Criticism of rival theories does not fall within the limits of this essay. But the picture-theory of memory is so firm a habit with many people—is taken so unquestioningly as the presupposition for all further analysis of recollection—that it seems advisable to criticize it expressly, in order to contrast Husserl’s view. Only so will the latter be understandable.

  5. 5.

    See Chap. 13.

  6. 6.

    The present essay will avoid this usage.

  7. 7.

    Cf. Chap. 8.

  8. 8.

    P. 47.

  9. 9.

    It is evidently a mistake to believe that a fictive object cannot also be real.

  10. 10.

    There is a marginal note on the last two sentences of this paragraph: “Not Husserl (?)”—L.E.

  11. 11.

    Pp. 48ff.

  12. 12.

    Pp. 37ff.

  13. 13.

    Pp. 22f.

  14. 14.

    In the case of phantasy or imagination we must distinguish between fictive reproduction of the phantasied act (an imagined remembering of an imagined impressional act) and real reproduction of an act of phantasying. In our stock illustration, we must distinguish between the case where the fictive man (perhaps a fictive I) who once saw the castle, remembers that experience, and the case where the man at the desk remembers imaging the castle (as seen by the fictive man).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cairns, D., Embree, L. (2013). Direct and Indirect, Impressional and Reproductive, Consciousness. In: Embree, L. (eds) The Philosophy of Edmund Husserl. Phaenomenologica, vol 207. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5043-2_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics