Skip to main content

The Simulation of Nature and the Dissimulation of the Law on a Baroque Stage: Galileo and the Church Revisited

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Science in the Age of Baroque

Abstract

This paper presents the way Galileo’s telescopic observations were woven into a new kind of astronomical discourse that provoked extreme reactions by the Catholic establishment of those days. Galileo, I shall argue, invented his own strategies for dealing with the gap opened up by the telescope between appearances and being – between what seemed to be the case and what actually was out there. In doing so, Galileo added a dimension to the practices of signification common in the political, theological and theatrical arenas of Baroque culture. In each of these areas, the gap between “seem and be” was haunting political actors and courtiers, theologians and playwrights. Obviously, the need to cope with such gap gave birth to new or modified cultural forms, among them new forms of representation and allegory. Following Louis Marin’s work on the discourse of representation around the King’s portrait (Marin 1988), as well as Walter Benjamin’s argument on the centrality of allegorical practices in Baroque theatre (Benjamin 1977), I shall isolate two additional arenas in which Baroque forms of representation and allegory were used: in Galileo’s attempt to cope with the visual evidence about the heavens on the one hand; and in the Inquisition trial of the Medici mathematician-philosopher on the other. My aim is to show that the constitution of a new kind of scientific discourse and the challenge it posed to Catholic hegemony took active part in Baroque rituals of representation and allegory, and that those should not be read as mere literary techniques. Rather, Galileo’s use of representation and allegory involved him in a highly sophisticated system of communication relevant for understanding different dimensions of a baroque scholar’s life. In the last part of the paper I will point out how, during the trial of Galileo, allegorical practices were stretched beyond the limit of signification and transformed into a mode of dissimulation – a recognized practice defined by contemporaries as “dissimulazione onesta”.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Accetto, Torquato. 1641. Della dissimulazione onesta. a cura di Salvatore Silvano Nigro, Collana Biblioteca Einaudi n. 4 (Torino, 1997). http://it.wikisource.org/wiki/Della_dissimulazione_onesta. Accessed 2 Oct 2011.

  • Alberti, Leon Battista. 1972. On painting and on sculpture: The latin texts of De picture and De Statua, ed., trans. and intro. C. Grayson. London: Phaidon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle. 1984. De partibus animalium (On the parts of animals) (trans: Ogle, W.). In The complete works of Aristotle, ed. Jonathan Barnes, Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press vol. 1, 994–1086.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, Walter. 1977. The origin of German tragic drama (trans: Osborne, John). London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biagioli, Mario. 1993. Galileo, courtier: The practice of science in the culture of absolutism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackwell, R.J. 1991. Galileo, Bellarmine, and the Bible. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bredekamp, Horst. 2007. Galilei der Künstler: der Mond, die Sonne, die Hand. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Santillana, Giorgio. 1976 (reprint). The crime of Galileo. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fantoli, Annibale. 1996 (2nd English ed.). Galileo: For Copernicanism and for the church (trans: G.V. Coyne, S.J.). Vatican: Vatican Observatory Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Favaro, Antonio (ed.). 1968 (reprint). Le opere di Galileo Galilei. 20 vols. Firenze: G. Barbèra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldhay, Rivka. 1995. Galileo and the church: Political inquisition or critical dialogue? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldhay, Rivka. 2001. Recent narratives of Galileo and the church or: The three dogmas of the counter-reformation. In Galileo in context, ed. Jürgen Renn, 219–239. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finocchiaro, Maurice A. (ed. and trans.). 1989. The Galileo affair: A documentary history. Berkeley : University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, Angus. 1964. The theory of a symbolic mode. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galilei, Galileo. 1610. The starry messenger (trans: Drake, Stillman). In Discoveries and opinions of Galileo, ed. and trans. Stillman Drake, 1957, 21–58. Garden City: Doubleday Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galilei, Galileo. 1613. Letters on sunspots (trans: Drake, Stillman). In Discoveries and opinions of Galileo, ed. and trans. Stillman Drake, 1957, 87–144. Garden City: Doubleday Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galilei, Galileo. 1623. Letters on sunspots (trans: Drake, Stillman). In Discoveries and opinions of Galileo, ed. and trans. Stillman Drake, 1957, 229–280. Garden City: Doubleday Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marin, Louis. 1988. Portrait of the king (trans: Houle, Martha M.). Houndmills: Macmillan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nägele, R. 1991. Theater, theory, speculation: Walter Benjamin and the scenes of modernity. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholas of Cusa. 1962. Nicolai Cusae Cardinalis Opera (Paris, 1514); Unveränderter Nachdruck, Frankfurt/Main: Minerva G.m.b.H.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholas of Cusa. 1998. Nicholas of Cusa: Metaphysical speculation: Six latin texts (Translated into English by Jasper Hopkins). Minneapolis: The Arthur J. Banning Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeves, Eileen. 1997. Painting the heavens: Art and science in the age of Galileo. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valleriani, Matteo. 2010. Galileo engineer. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rivka Feldhay .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Feldhay, R. (2012). The Simulation of Nature and the Dissimulation of the Law on a Baroque Stage: Galileo and the Church Revisited. In: Gal, O., Chen-Morris, R. (eds) Science in the Age of Baroque. International Archives of the History of Ideas Archives internationales d'histoire des idées, vol 208. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4807-1_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics