Abstract
The Ethical Brain challenges a variety of sociological assumptions that basic notions of morality vary culturally, that we cannot criticize the idea of other cultures impacting negatively on human nature, or that there is no human nature at all. Findings from five authors are used to bring sociology in line with more current neurosociological findings on the matter. Differences in Gazzaniga and de Waal in terms of brain processes involved in moral decisions are presented, as well as agreements about the available evidence for innate morality. An attempt to balance the positive features of our innate morality with the negative characteristics of humans is discussed. Finally, processes that encourage humans to identify with those that are the sources of unfairness are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Though Hauser has been criticized from misrepresenting his data, these allegations are not aimed at the finding reported here.
References
Berrios, G. E., & Markova, L. S. (2002). The self and psychiatry: A conceptual psychiatry. In T. Kircher & A. David (Eds.), The self in neuroscience and psychiatry (pp. 9–39). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Churchland, P. S. (2011). Braintrust: What neuroscience tells us about morality. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
De Waal, F. (2009). The age of empathy: Nature’s Lessons for a kinder society. New York: Crown Bubl.
Franks, D. D. (2010). Neurosociology: The nexus between neuroscience and social psychology. New York: Springer Press.
Gazzaniga, M. S. (1998). The mind’s past. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Gazzaniga, M. S. (2005). The ethical brain: The science of our moral dilemmas. New York: Harper.
Geertz, C. (Ed.). (1974). Myth, symbol and culture. New York: Norton.
Hauser, M. (2006). Moral minds: How nature designed our universal sense of right and wrong. New York: Harpercollins.
Jost, J. T., Banaji, M. R., & Nosek, B. (2004). A decade of system justifications theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25(6), 881–919.
Kluckhohn, C. (1944). Mirror for man. New York: Fawcett.
Montagu, A. (1967). On being human. New York: Hawthorn.
Montague, R. (2007). Your brain is (almost) perfect: How we make decisions. New York: Penguin Group.
Sampson, E. (1981). Cognitive psychology as ideology. American Psychologist, 36(7), 730.
Sampson, E. (1988). The debate on individualism: Indigenous psychologies of the individual and their role in personal and societal functioning. American Psychologist, 43(1), 15.
Scheff, T. J. (1990). Microsociology: Discourse, emotion, and social structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Scott, M., & Lyman, S. (1968). Accounts. American Sociological Review, 31, 46.
Turner, J. H. (2000). On the origins of human emotions: A sociological inquiry into the evolution of human affect. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Westen, D. (1985). Self and society: Narcissism, collectivism, and the development of morals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Franks, D.D. (2013). Notes Toward a Neuroethics. In: Franks, D.D., Turner, J.H. (eds) Handbook of Neurosociology. Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4473-8_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4473-8_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-4472-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-4473-8
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)