Skip to main content

Rural Families in Transition

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: International Handbooks of Population ((IHOP,volume 3))

Abstract

This chapter documents the transformation of rural families through an examination of two of the most important changes in American family life—changes in family structure and changes in women’s employment and family breadwinning—from 1970 to 2009, using Current Population Survey (CPS) data. Particular attention is paid to variations between families living in rural areas, central cities, and suburban places. We identify trends in marriage and divorce, the rise in single motherhood, and decreased fertility. Additionally, we examine the rising diversity of families resulting from increased educational attainment and greater female labor force participation. Finally, we discuss the implications of these changes in family structure and family employment patterns for income inequality and poverty. Over time, we find that rural families increasingly resemble urban families, but important differences remain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This was particularly true for white, middle-class women but there have been historical variations in these patterns. For example, black women have historically had high labor force participation rates, even after the birth of a child (see, for example, Jones, 2010).

  2. 2.

    We analyze 1970, 1990, and 2009 Current Population Survey (CPS) data (1970 and 1990 March Supplements and 2009 Annual Social and Economic Supplement data) to document change in families residing in rural, suburban, and central city places. The CPS is a nationally representative sample of American households and collects demographic, economic, and employment information. We analyze both the individual (with analyses including all respondents age 18 and over, and the total population) and family data (with analyses including all families and subfamilies with a household head 18 and over). Dollar values are inflated to 2009 using the Bureau of Labor Statistics inflation calculator. Comparisons presented in the text are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. The term “rural” and nonmetropolitan are both used to refer to persons or families living outside the officially designated metropolitan areas. Central city refers to those residing within metropolitan areas inside the central core, and suburban refers to those residing within metropolitan areas outside the central core. Those living in areas not identified by the US Census Bureau for reasons of confidentiality are not included in the analysis by place. Metropolitan residence is based on Office of Management and Budget delineation at the time of data collection.

  3. 3.

    Population pyramid data for central cities and suburban areas for 1970 and 2009 are available upon request.

  4. 4.

    Although substantively similar, the difference between rural (13.3%) and central city (13.2%) places is statistically significant given large sample size.

  5. 5.

    Some of the differences in wages may be attributable to differences in the cost of living in rural and other areas (Debertin & Goetz, 1994; Kurre, 2003).

  6. 6.

    Our analyses differ from the Raley et al. (2006) analyses in several ways: our estimates (a) are place-based, (b) report estimates using earnings rather than income, (c) include both primary and secondary families, and (d) include couples with neither spouse employed. Our estimates for 1990 and 2009 are not substantially different from the Raley et al. (1990) and (2001) estimates. However, we report lower levels of husbands as sole providers and higher levels of husbands as primary providers in 1970 compared with the Raley et al. (1970) estimates, but the general trends are the same.

  7. 7.

    Dollar values are inflated to 2009 using the Bureau of Labor Statistics inflation calculator; substantive earnings differences are discussed.

References

  • Albrecht, D. E., & Albrecht, C. M. (2004). Metro/nonmetro residence, nonmarital conception, and conception outcomes. Rural Sociology, 69(3), 430–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnett, J. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55(5), 469–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bianchi, S. M., Robinson, J. P., & Milkie, M. A. (2006). Changing rhythms of American family life. New York: Russell Sage Foundation Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, F. D., Ferber, M. A., & Winkler, A. E. (2002). The economics of women, men, and work (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bokemeier, J., & Tickamyer, A. (1985). Labor force experiences of nonmetropolitan women. Rural Sociology, 50, 51–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. L., & Snyder, A. R. (2006). Residential differences in cohabitors’ union transition. Rural Sociology, 71(2), 311–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cancian, M., & Reed, D. (2009). Family structure, childbearing, and parental employment: Implications for the level and trend in poverty. Focus, 26(2), 21–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casper, L. M., & Bianchi, S. M. (2002). Continuity and change in the American family. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casper, L. M., & Sayer, L. C. (2000). Cohabitation transitions: Different attitudes and purposes, different paths. Presented at the annual meeting of the Population Association of America, March, Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherlin, A. J. (1981). Marriage, divorce, and remarriage. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherlin, A. J. (2009). The marriage-go-round: The state of marriage and the family in America today. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, Random House, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, Supplement 94, S95–S120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cotter, D. A., DeFiore, J., Hermsen, J. M., Kowalewski, B. M., & Vanneman, R. (1996). Gender inequality in nonmetropolitan and metropolitan areas. Rural Sociology, 61, 272–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crissey, S. R. (2009). Educational Attainment in the United States: 2007. Current Population Reports, U.S. Census Bureau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debertin, D. L., & Goetz, S. J. (1994). Differences in rural and urban schools: Issues for policymakers. Lexington, KY: Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Kentucky.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demi, M. A., McLaughlin, D., & Snyder, A. R. (2007). Rural youth—Stayers and leavers. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Rural Sociological Society, Santa Clara, CA, August 2, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeNavas-Walt, C., Proctor, B. D., & Smith, J. C. (2009). Income, poverty, and health insurance coverage in the United States: 2009. Current Population Reports, P60-238. U.S. Census Bureau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellwood, D. T., & Jencks, C. (2004). The uneven spread of single-parent families: What do we know? In K. M. Neckerman (Ed.), Social inequality (pp. 3–78). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • English, A., Hartmann, H., & Hegewisch, A. (2009). Unemployment among single mother families. Fact Sheet #C369. Washington, DC: Institute for Women’s Policy Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falk, W., & Lobao, L. (2003). Who benefits from economic restructuring? Lessons from the past, challenges for the future? In D. Brown & L. Swanson (Eds.), Challenges for rural America in the twenty-first century (pp. 152–165). University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furstenberg, F. F. (2010). On a new schedule: Transitions to adulthood and family change. Transition to Adulthood, 20(1), 67–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galinsky, E., Aumann, K., & Bond, J. T. (2009). Times are changing: Gender and generation at work and at home. New York: Families and Work Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glasgow, N. (2003). Older rural families. In D. Brown & L. E. Swanson (Eds.), Challenges for rural America in the twenty-first century (pp. 86–96). University Park, PA: Penn State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glasgow, N., & Brown, D. L. (2008). Grey gold: Do older in-migrants benefit rural communities? Policy Brief No. 10. Durham, NH: Carsey Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glauber, R. (2009). Family-friendly policies for rural working mothers. Policy Brief No. 15. Durham, NH: Carsey Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glick, P. C. (1977). Updating the life cycle of the family. Journal of Marriage and Family, 39(1), 5–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldin, C. (2006). The quiet revolution that transformed women’s employment, education, and family. The American Economic Review, 96(2), 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grall, T. S. (2009). Custodial mothers and fathers and their child support: 2007. Current Population Reports. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, B. E., Martin, J. A., & Ventura, S. J. (2009). Births: Preliminary data for 2007. National Vital Statistics Reports, 57(12). National Center for Health Statistics, Center for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heaton, T. B., Lichter, D. T., & Amoateng, A. (1989). The timing of family formation: Rural-urban differentials in first intercourse, childbirth, and marriage. Rural Sociology, 54(1), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, C., Son, E., & Wang, L. (2010). Prevalence and factors of domestic violence among unmarried mothers with a young child. Families in Society, 91(2), 171–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, L., & Jensen, E. B. (2011). Employment hardship among rural men. In K. Smith & A. Tickamyer (Eds.), Economic restructuring and family well being in rural America (pp. 40–59). University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, K. M., & Lichter, D. T. (2010). The changing faces of America’s children and youth. Issue Brief No. 15. Durham, NH: The Carsey Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joliffe, D. (2004). Rural poverty at a glance. Rural Development Research Report No. 100. Economic Research Service, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, J. (2010). Labor of love, labor of sorrow: Black women, work, and the family, from slavery to the present. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurre, J. A. (2003). Is the cost of living less in rural areas? International Regional Science Review, 26, 86–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larson, O. (1978). Values and beliefs of rural people. In T. R. Ford (Ed.), Rural U.S.A.: Persistence and change (pp. 91–112). Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levernier, W., Partridge, M. D., & Rickman, D. S. (1998). Differences in metropolitan and nonmetropolitan U.S. family income inequality: A cross-county comparison. Journal of Urban Economics, 44, 272–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, F. (1998). The new dollars and dreams: American incomes and economic change. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichter, D. T. (1989). The underemployment of American rural women: Prevalence, trends and spatial inequality. Journal of Rural Studies, 5, 199–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lichter, D., & Eggebeen, D. (1992). Child poverty and the changing rural family. Rural Sociology, 57(2), 151–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lichter, D. T., & Jensen, L. (2002). Rural America in transition: Poverty and welfare at the turn of the 21st century. In B. Weber, G. Duncan, L. & Whitener (Eds.), Rural dimensions of welfare reform (pp. 77–110). Kalamazoo, MI: W.E. Upjohn Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichter, D. T., & Johnson, K. M. (2009). Immigrant gateways and Hispanic migration to new destinations. International Migration Review, 43(3), 496–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lichter, D. T., & Qian, Z. (2004). Marriage and family in a multiracial society. New York: Russell Sage Foundation and Washington, DC: Population Reference Bureau.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacTavish, K., & Salamon, S. (2003). Mobile home park on the prairie: A new rural community form. Rural Sociology, 66(4), 487–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattingly, M. J., & Smith, K. (2010). Changes in wives’ employment when husbands stop working: A recession-prosperity comparison. Family Relations, 59, 343–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattingly, M. J., & Stransky, M. L. (2010). Young child poverty in 2009: Rural poverty rate jumps to nearly 29 percent. Issue Brief No. 17. Durham, NH: Carsey Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCrate, E. (2011). Parents’ work time in rural America: The growth of irregular schedules. In K. Smith & A. Tickamyer (Eds.), Economic restructuring and family well being in rural America (pp. 177–193). University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLanahan, S., & Sandefur, G. D. (1994). Growing up with a single parent: What hurts, what helps. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, D. K., & Coleman-Jensen, A. J. (2008). Nonstandard employment in the metropolitan United States. Rural Sociology, 73(4), 631–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, D. K., & Coleman-Jensen, A. J. (2011). Economic restructuring and family structure, 1980–2000: A focus on female-headed families with children. In K. Smith & A. Tickamyer (Eds.), Economic restructuring and family well being in rural America (pp. 105–123). University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, D. K., & Perman, L. (1991). Returns vs. endowments in the earnings attainment process for metropolitan and nonmetropolitan men and women. Rural Sociology, 56, 339–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, K. K., & Weber, B. A. (2003). Persistent poverty across the rural-urban continuum. Working Paper 03-01. Columbia, MO: Rural Poverty Research Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, M. (2011). Job characteristics and economic survival strategies: The effect of economic restructuring and marital status in a rural county. In K. Smith & A. Tickamyer (Eds.), Economic restructuring and family well being in rural America (pp. 136–157). University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Hare, W. (2009). The forgotten fifth: Child poverty in rural America. Report No. 10. Durham, NH: Carsey Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Hare, W. P., & Johnson, K. M. (2004). Child poverty in rural America. PRB Reports to America, 3(1). Washington, DC: Population Reference Bureau.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Hare, W., Manning, W., Porter, M., & Lyons, H. (2009). Rural children are more likely to live in cohabiting-couple households. Policy Brief No. 14. Durham, NH: Carsey Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parrado, E. A., & Kandel, W. A. (2010). Hispanic population growth and rural income inequality. Social Forces, 88(3), 1121–1450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pascoe, J. M., Miryoung, L., Specht, S., McNicholas, C., Spears, W., Gans, A., et al. (2010). Mothers with positive or negative depression screens evaluate a maternal resource guide. Journal of Pediatric Health Care, 24(6), 378–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raley, S., Mattingly, M. J., & Bianchi, S. M. (2006). How dual are dual income couples? Documenting change from 1970 to 2001. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 68, 11–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, C. (1997). Changes in the social and economic status of women by metro-nonmetro residence. Agriculture Information Bulletin No. 732. Washington, DC: Rural Economy Division, Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romero, A., Baumle, A., Badgett, M., & Gates, G. (2007). Census snapshot: Illinois. Los Angeles, CA: The Williams Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sayer, L., Cohen, P. N., & Casper, L. (2004). Women, men, and work. In The American People: Census 2000. New York: Russell Sage Foundation & Washington, DC: Population Reference Bureau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnaiberg, A., & Goldenberg, S. (2003). From empty nest to crowded nest: The dynamics of incompletely launched adults. In H. Z. Lopata & J. A. Levy (Eds.), Social problems across the life course (pp. 97–118). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seltzer, J. A. (2000). Families formed outside of marriage. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 1247–1268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, J. (2009). Those who work, those who don’t: Poverty, morality, and family in rural America. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slack, T., & Jensen, L. (2002). Race, ethnicity, and underemployment in nonmetropolitan America: A 30-year profile. Rural Sociology, 67, 208–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. M., & Gates, G. J. (2001). Gay and lesbian families in the United States: Same-sex unmarried partner households. A Human Rights Campaign Report. Washington, DC: Human Rights Campaign.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K. (2008). Working hard for the money: Trends in women’s employment 1970–2007. National Reports, 1(5). Durham, NH: The Carsey Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K. (2010). Wives as Breadwinners: Wives Share of Family Earnings Hits Historic High during the Second Year of the Great Recession. Factsheet No. 20. Durham, NH: Carsey Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K. (2011). Changing roles: Women and work in rural America. In K. Smith & A. Tickamyer (Eds.), Economic restructuring and family well being in rural America (pp. 60–81). University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K., & Glauber, R. (2009). Exploring the spatial wage penalty for women: Does it matter where you live? Paper presented at the American Sociological Association meetings in San Francisco, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K., & Tickamyer, A. (2011). Economic restructuring and family well being in rural America. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smock, P. J. (2000). Cohabitation in the United States: An appraisal of research themes, findings, and implications. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, A. (2011). Patterns of family formation and dissolution in rural American and implications for well-being. In K. Smith & A. Tickamyer (Eds.), Economic restructuring and family well being in rural America (pp. 124–135). University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, A. R., Brown, S. L., & Condo, E. P. (2004). Residential differences in family formation: The significance of cohabitation. Rural Sociology, 69(2), 235–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, A. R., McLaughlin, D. K., & Findeis, J. (2006). Household composition and poverty among female-headed households with children: Differences by race and residence. Rural Sociology, 71(4), 597–624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sørensen, A. (1983). Women’s employment patterns after marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 45(2), 311–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, B., & Wolfers, J. (2007). Marriage and divorce: Changes and their driving forces. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21(2), 27–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tickamyer, A. R., & Duncan, C. M. (1990). Poverty and opportunity structure in rural America. Annual Review of Sociology, 16, 67–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tickamyer, A., & Henderson, D. (2003). Rural women: New roles for the new century? In D. Brown & L. Swanson (Eds.), Challenges for rural America in the twenty-first century (pp. 109–117). University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vera-Toscano, E., Phimister, E., & Weersink, A. (2004). Panel estimates of the Canadian rural/urban women’s wage gap. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 86, 1136–1151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willits, F. K., Bealer, R. C., & Crider, D. M. (1982). Persistence of rural/urban differences. In D. A. Dillman & D. J. Hobbs (Eds.), Rural society in the U.S.: Issues for the 1980s (pp. 58–68). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, L. (2008). Cohort estimates of nonmarital fertility for U.S. women. Demography, 45(1), 193–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Jessica Bean and Michelle Stransky for research assistance. This work was supported by the Annie E. Casey Foundation, the W. K. Kellogg Foundation, and anonymous donation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kristin E. Smith .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Smith, K.E., Mattingly, M.J. (2012). Rural Families in Transition. In: Kulcsár, L., Curtis, K. (eds) International Handbook of Rural Demography. International Handbooks of Population, vol 3. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1842-5_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics