Skip to main content

Introduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine ((LIME,volume 49))

Abstract

Recently, a young woman was referred by a private ultrasound clinic to the maternal health unit at a large public hospital in Sydney, Australia, following an abnormal foetal morphology scan at 19 weeks gestation. While the nuchal translucency screening at 12 weeks had indicated a low risk for Down’s Syndrome, the later screen showed that the foetus she was carrying was missing its left hand.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Joshi, Sneha, and Talat Uppal. 2010. Absent fetal hand: A case report. Australian Journal of Ultrasound Medicine 13(2):24–26.

  2. 2.

    Savulescu, Julian. 2001. Is current practice around late termination of pregnancy eugenic and discriminatory? Maternal interests and abortion. Journal of Medical Ethics 27(3), 167.

  3. 3.

    See Chervenak, Frank A., and Laurence B. McCullough. 2004. Ethical issues in the diagnosis and management of genetic disorders in the fetus. In Genetic disorders and the Fetus, ed. Aubrey Milunsky. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press; Chervenak, Frank A., and Laurence B. McCullough. 1999. Ethics in fetal medicine. Balliere’s Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology 13(4):491–502.

  4. 4.

    Chervenak and McCullough, Ethical issues, 1138; Chervenak and McCullough, Ethics in fetal Medicine, 493.

  5. 5.

    Chervenak and McCullough, Ethical issues, 1150; Chervenak and McCullough, Ethics in fetal Medicine, 494.

  6. 6.

    Kevles, Daniel J. 1998. In the name of eugenics: Genetics and the uses of human heredity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; Paul, Diane B. 1994. Is human genetics disguised eugenics? In Genes and human self-knowledge: Historical and philosophical reflections on modern genetics, eds. Robert F. Weir, Susan C. Lawrence, and Evan Fales, 67–83. Iowa City, IA: University of Iowa Press; Lemke, Thomas. 2005. From eugenics to the government of genetic risks. In Genetic governance: Health, risk and ethics in the biotech era, eds. Robin Bunton and Alan Petersen, 95–105. New York and London: Routledge.

  7. 7.

    Wikler, Daniel. 1999. Can we learn from eugenics? Journal of Medical Ethics, 25(2):183–194. Also see the discussion in Buchanan, Allen et al. 2000. From chance to choice: Genetics and justice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 46–52.

  8. 8.

    King, David. 2001. Eugenic tendencies in modern genetics. In Redesigning life: The worldwide challenge of genetic engineering, ed. Brian Tokar, 173. London: Zed Books.

  9. 9.

    Kitcher, Philip. 1996. The lives to come: The genetic revolution and human possibilities. London: Penguin Press, 204.

  10. 10.

    Ibid.

  11. 11.

    Though some have also argued more directly against the extension of ‘laissez faire’ eugenics. See King, Eugenic Tendencies, 178–79.

  12. 12.

    Agar, Nicholas. 2004. Liberal eugenics: In defence of human enhancement. Oxford: Blackwell, 135.

  13. 13.

    See Feinberg, Joel. 1980. The child’s right to an open future. In Whose child? Children’s rights, parental authority, and state power, eds. William Aiken and Hugh LaFollette. Totawa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield.

  14. 14.

    Foucault, Michel. 1981. The history of sexuality, volume 1: An introduction (trans: Hurley, Richard). London: Penguin, 257–272.

  15. 15.

    Canguilhem, Georges. 1997. On Histoire de la folie as an event. (trans: Hobart, Ann) In Foucault and his interlocutors, ed. Arnold I. Davidson, 32. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.

  16. 16.

    In History of Sexuality vol. 1, Foucault insists that it is necessary to be nominalistic in relation to power; power is not an institution or structure and nor an internal strength. Instead, he argues that it is simply ‘the name one attributes to a complex strategical situation in a particular society’ (93). Thus, power is not substantive (it does not exist in itself) but is simply the name or term used to describe a relational complex. This underpins Foucault’s view that what is required is not a ‘theory of power’ that explains what it is but an analysis of local effects, which focuses on what ‘it’ does.

  17. 17.

    Butler, Judith. 2004. Undoing gender. New York and London: Routledge, 41, 42; emphasis in original.

  18. 18.

    See Butler, Judith. 2002. What is critique? An essay on Foucault’s virtue. In The political: Readings in continental philosophy, ed. David Ingram, 212–226. London: Basil Blackwell.

Bibliography

  • Agar, Nicholas. 2004. Liberal eugenics: In defence of human enhancement. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, Allen, Dan W. Brock, Norman Daniels, and Daniel Wikler. 2000. From chance to choice: Genetics and justice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, Judith. 2002. What is critique? An essay on Foucault’s virtue. In The political: Readings in continental philosophy, ed. David Ingram, 212–226. London: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, Judith. 2004. Undoing gender. New York and London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canguilhem, Georges. 1997. On Histoire de la folie as an event. (trans: Hobart, Ann) In Foucault and his interlocutors, ed. Arnold I. Davidson, 28–32. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chervenak, Frank A., and Laurence B. McCullough. 1999. Ethics in fetal medicine. Balliere’s Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology 13(4):491–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chervenak, Frank A., and Laurence B. McCullough. 2004. Ethical issues in the diagnosis and management of genetic disorders in the fetus. In Genetic disorders and the fetus, ed. Aubrey Milunsky, 1135–1163. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg, Joel. 1980. The child’s right to an open future. In Whose child? Children’s rights, parental authority, and state power, eds. William Aiken and Hugh LaFollette. Totawa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. 1981. The history of sexuality, volume 1: An introduction (trans: Hurley, Richard). London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joshi, Sneha, and Talat Uppal. 2010. Absent fetal hand: A case report. Australian Journal of Ultrasound Medicine 13(2):24–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kevles, Daniel J. 1998. In the name of eugenics: Genetics and the uses of human heredity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, David. 2001. Eugenic tendencies in modern genetics. In Redesigning life: The worldwide challenge of genetic engineering, ed. Brian Tokar, 171–181. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitcher, Philip. 1996. The lives to come: The genetic revolution and human possibilities. London: Penguin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemke, Thomas. 2005. From eugenics to the government of genetic risks. In Genetic governance: Health, risk and ethics in the biotech era, eds. Robin Bunton and Alan Petersen, 95–106. New York and London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, Diane B. 1994. Is human genetics disguised eugenics? In Genes and human self-knowledge: Historical and philosophical reflections on modern genetics, eds. Robert F. Weir, Susan C. Lawrence, and Evan Fales, 67–83. Iowa City, IA: University of Iowa Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savulescu, Julian. 2001. Is current practice around late termination of pregnancy eugenic and discriminatory? Maternal interests and abortion. Journal of Medical Ethics 27(3):165–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wikler, Daniel. 1999. Can we learn from eugenics? Journal of Medical Ethics 25(2):183–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Catherine Mills .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mills, C. (2011). Introduction. In: Futures of Reproduction. International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine, vol 49. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1427-4_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics