Abstract
Right- and left-breast mammograms are traditionally displayed back-to-back, projection for projection, to facilitate the perception of areas of asymmetry, which may on occasion be the only manifestation of breast cancer on standard mammographic views. Asymmetry is usually distinguished from mass in that it demonstrates concave-outward rather than the convex-outward contours typical of a mass, and that it is interspersed with fat rather than appearing denser in the center than at the periphery (typical of a mass). There are four types of asymmetry, all of which represent areas of fibroglandular-density tissue that is more extensive in one breast than the other:
-
1.
Summation artifact: This is caused by superimposition of normal fibroglandular breast structures on a given mammographic projection. As such, this finding will be visible on only one of the two standard views and will not be seen on additional views taken in different projections. One must distinguish summation artifact from the other types of asymmetry described below, because it never represents breast cancer and should not be subjected to biopsy. A one-view-only mammographic finding is called an asymmetry prior to diagnostic imaging evaluation. Most (>75%) asymmetries represent summation artifacts; the rest are found to be other types of asymmetry or masses.
-
2.
Global asymmetry: formerly called asymmetric breast tissue, represents a greater volume of fibroglandular tissue in one breast than in the corresponding location in the opposite breast, without associated mass, microcalcification, or architectural distortion. It is found in approximately 3% of screening mammography examinations. It almost always represents a normal variant, but occasionally it may indicate the presence of an underlying breast cancer if it corresponds to a palpable abnormality. In this latter clinical setting, the radiologist usually will recall the patient for additional imaging evaluation.
-
3.
Focal asymmetry: formerly called focal asymmetric density, is an asymmetry of fibroglandular-tissue density seen on two different mammographic projections but lacking the convex-outward contours and conspicuity of a mass. It usually represents an island of normal dense breast tissue, but its lack of specific benign characteristics may warrant further evaluation, especially if it is not interspersed with fat. In a retrospective study of 300 consecutive nonpalpable breast cancers, 3% were identified as focal asymmetries. The likelihood of malignancy among findings characterized as focal asymmetry (without associated mass, calcifications, architectural distortion, sonographic abnormality, or palpable correlate) is <1%.
-
4.
Developing asymmetry: formerly called developing density or neodensity, is a focal asymmetry that is new, larger, or denser on current examination than previously. To identify such a lesion, one must have prior mammograms available for comparison. In a retrospective study of 300 consecutive nonpalpable breast cancers, 6% were identified as developing asymmetries. The likelihood of malignancy among findings characterized as developing asymmetry is approximately 15%.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Suggested Reading
Bassett LW (2000) Imaging of breast masses. Radiol Clin North Am 38:669–691
D’Orsi CJ, Mendelson EB, Ikeda DM et al (2003) Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS), 4th edn. American College of Radiology, Reston, VA
D’Orsi CJ, Sickles EA, Mendelson EB et al (2011) Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS), 5th edn. American College of Radiology, Reston, VA (in press)
Kopans DB, Swann CA, White G et al (1989) Asymmetric breast tissue. Radiology 171:639–643
Leung JWT, Sickles EA (2000) Multiple bilateral masses detected on screening mammography: assessment of need for recall imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 175:23–29
Leung JWT, Sickles EA (2007) Developing asymmetry identified on mammography: correlation with imaging outcome and pathologic findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188:667–675
Moskowitz M (1983) The predictive value of certain mammographic signs in screening for breast cancer. Cancer 51:1007–1010
Piccoli CW, Feig SA, Palazzo JP (1999) Developing asymmetric breast tissue. Radiology 211:111–117
Samardar P, de Paredes ES, Grimes MM, Wilson JD (2002) Focal asymmetric densities seen at mammography: US and pathologic correlation. RadioGraphics 22:19–33
Sickles EA (1984) Mammographic features of “early” breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 143:461–464
Sickles EA (1986) Mammographic features of 300 consecutive nonpalpable breast cancers. AJR Am J Roentgenol 146:661–663
Sickles EA (1989) Breast masses: mammographic evaluation. Radiology 173:297–303
Sickles EA (1994) Nonpalpable, circumscribed, noncalcified solid breast masses: likelihood of malignancy based on lesion size and age of patient. Radiology 192:439–442
Sickles EA (1995) Management of probably benign breast lesions. Radiol Clin North Am 33:1123–1130
Sickles EA (1998) Findings at mammographic screening on only one standard projection: outcomes analysis. Radiology 208:471–475
Sickles EA (2007) The spectrum of breast asymmetries: imaging features, work-up, management. Radiol Clin North Am 45:765–771
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag Italia
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sickles, E.A. (2011). Mammography: Asymmetries, Masses, and Architectural Distortion. In: Hodler, J., von Schulthess, G.K., Zollikofer, C.L. (eds) Diseases of the Heart and Chest, Including Breast 2011–2014. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-1938-6_39
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-1938-6_39
Publisher Name: Springer, Milano
Print ISBN: 978-88-470-1937-9
Online ISBN: 978-88-470-1938-6
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)