Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Monitoraggio delle condizioni fetali

  • Chapter
Medicina dell’età prenatale

  • 715 Accesses

Estratto

Per ridurre i tassi di morbilità e mortalità perinatali è necessario un controllo assiduo delle condizioni fetali.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliografia

  1. Goeschen K (1998) Cardiotocografia pratica. CIC Edizioni Internazionali, Roma

    Google Scholar 

  2. Capozzi A (1973) Cardiotocografia. In: Destro et al (eds). Il feto e il neonato a rischio. Verducci Edizioni Scientifiche, Roma, pp 158–216

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fischer WM (1976) Kardiokografia 2 Aufl. Thieme, Stuttgart (S88); 3 Aufl 1981

    Google Scholar 

  4. Pattison N, McCowan L (2000) Cardiotocography for antepartum fetal assessment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2):CD001068

    Google Scholar 

  5. Devoe LD, Jones CR (2002) Non stress test: evidence-based use in high-risk pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol 45:986–992

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Huddleston JF (2002) Continued utility of the contraction stress test? Clinical Obstet Gynecol 45:1005–1014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (1989) Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring. ACOC technical bulletin no. 132. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  8. Banta HD, Thacker SB (1979) Costs and benefits to electronic fetal monitoring: a review of the literature. Report No. DHEWPHS-79-3245. National Center for Health Services Research, Rockville MD

    Google Scholar 

  9. American Academy of Pediatrics and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (1997) Guidelines for Perinatal Care, 4th Edition. AAP, Elk Grove Village, IL

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sykes GS, Molley PM, Johnson P et al (1983) Fetal distress and the condition of newborn infants. BMJ 287:943–945

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Clark SL, Gimovsky ML, Miller FC (1982) Fetal heart rate response to scalp blood sampling. Am J Obstet Gynecol 144:706–708

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Leszczynska-Gorzelak B, Poniedzialek-Czajkowska E, Oleszczuk J (2002) Intrapartum cardiotocography and fetal pulse oximetry in assessing fetal hypoxia. Int J Gyneecol Obstet 76:9–14

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ayres-de-Campos D, Bernardes J, Costa-Perdra A (1999) Inconsistencies in classification by experts of cardiotocograms and subsequent clinical decision. Br J Obstet Gynecol 106:1307–1310

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bernardes J, Costa-Pereira A, Ayres-de-Campos D (1997) Evaluation of interobserver agreement of cardiotocograms. Int J Gynecol Obstet 57:33–37

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Pardey J, Moulden M, Redman CWG (2002) A computer system for the numerical analysis of nonstress test. Am J Obstet Gynecol 186:1095–1103

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bracero LA, Morgan S, Byrne DW (1999) Comparison of visual and computerized interpretation of non stress test results In a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 181:1254–1258

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Bernardes J, Moura ACF, Marques-de-Sà J et al (1994) The Porto system. In: Van Gejin HP, Copray FA (eds) A critical appraisal of fetal surveillance. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, pp 315–324

    Google Scholar 

  18. Di Lieto A, Catalano D, Pontillo M et al (2001) Telecardiotocography in prenatal telemedicine. J Telemed Telecare 7:119–120

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Di Lieto A, De Falco M, Campanile M et al (2006) Four years’ experience with antepartum cardiotocography using telemedidne. J Telemed Telecare 12:228–233

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ippolito A, De Falco M, Triassi M, Di Lieto A (2003) A cost study of prenatal telemedidne. J Telemed Telecare 9:288–291

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Società Italiana di Ecografia Ostetrica e Ginecologica (2006) Linee guida SIEOG 2006. Editeam Sas, Napoli

    Google Scholar 

  22. Neilson JP, Alfirevic Z (2000) Doppler ultrasound for fetal assessment in high risk pregnancies. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2):CD000073

    Google Scholar 

  23. Velazquez MD, Rayburn WF (2002) Antenatal evaluation of the fetus using fetal movement monitoring. Clin Obstet Gynecol 45:993–1004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Nijhuis JG (1992) Fetal behavioural states. In: Chevernak FA, Isaacson GC, Campbells (eds) Ultrasound in obstetrics and gynecology, Little Brown, Boston, voll pp 447–455

    Google Scholar 

  25. Manning FA (2002) Fetal biophysical profile: a critical appraisal. Clin Obstet Gynecol 45:975–985

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Alfirevic Z, Neilson JP (2000) Biophysical profile for fetal assessment in high-risk pregnancies. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2):CD000038

    Google Scholar 

  27. Rutherford SE, Phelan JP, Smith CV et al (1987) The fourquadrant assessment of amniotic fluid volume: an adjunct to antepartum fetal heart rate testing. Obstet Gynecol 70:353–356

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Arduini D, Giacomello F (2003) La sorveglianza antepartum: attendibilità, limiti e predittività della semeiotica strumentale. La velocimetria Doppler nella prevenzione del danno cerebrale fetale. In: Palla G (ed) Sorveglianza ostetrica e disabilità neuro-motorie. Editeam Sas, Napoli, pp 210–223

    Google Scholar 

  29. Arduini D e Gruppo di Studio SIGO (2002) Trattato di ecografia in ostetricia e ginecologia. Poletto, Milano

    Google Scholar 

  30. Arduini D, Rizzo G, Romanini C, Mancuso S (1997) Fetal blood flow velocity waveform as a predictor of growth retardation. Ostet Gynecol 70:7–10

    Google Scholar 

  31. Fleischer A, Bracero L, Blattner P (1985) Umbelical artery velocity waveform and intrauterine growth retardation. Am J Obstet Gynaecol 151:502–505

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Valensise H, Vasapollo B, Novelli GP et al (2001) Maternal diastolic function in asymptomatic pregnant women with bilateral notching of the uterine artery waveform at 24 weeks gestation: a pilot study. Ultrasound. Obstet Gynecol 18:450–455

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Harman CR, Baschat AA (2003) Comprehensive assessment of fetal well-being: which Doppler test should be performed? Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 15:147–157

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Sebire NJ (2003) Umbelical artery Doppler revisited: pathophyslology of changes in intrauterine growth restriction revealed. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 21:419–422

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Arduini D, Giacomello F (1998) Doppler velocimetry in high-risk pregnancy: other complications of pregnancy. In: Kurjak A (ed) Textbook of perinatal medicine. The Parthenon Publishing Group Ud, Lancaster, pp 452–461

    Google Scholar 

  36. Divon MY, Ferber A (2002) Doppler evaluation of the fetus. Clin Obstet Gynecol 45:1015–1025

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. ACOG committee opinion. Utility of antepartum umbelical artery Doppler velocimetry in intrauterine growth restriction. Number 188, October 1997 (replaces no. 116, November 1992). Committee on Obstetric Practice. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 59:269–270

    Google Scholar 

  38. Baschat AA, Gembruch U (2003) The cerebroplacental Doppler ratio revisited. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 21:124–127

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Clerici G, Luzietti R, Catuli A (2002) Cerebral hemodynamics and fetal behavioral states. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 19:340–343

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Bahado-Singh RO, Kovanci E, Jeffres A et al (1999) The Doppler cerebroplacental ratio and perinatal outcome in intrauterine growth restriction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 180:750–756

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Gramellini D, Folli MC, Raboni S et al (1992) Cerebralumbelical Doppler ratio as a predictor of adverse perinatal outcome. Obstet Gynecol 79:416–420

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Strigini FA, De Luca G, Lendoni G et al (1997) Middle cerebral artery velocimetry: different clinical relevance depending on umbilical velocimetry. Obstet Gynecol 90:953–957

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Gudmundsson S (1999) Importance of venous flow assessment for clinical decision-making. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 84:173–178

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (1994) Fetal distress and birth asphyxia. ACOG Committee opinion no. 37 — April 1994. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 45:302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Severinghaus JW, Keller JF (1992) Recent developments in pulse oximetry. Anesthesiology 76:1018–1038

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Luttkus AK, Friedmann W, Thomas S et al (1997) The safety of fetal pulse oximetry in parturients requiring fetal scalp blood sample. Obstet Gynecol 90:533–537

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (2001) Fetal pulse oximetry. ACOG Committee opinion no. 258. Obstet Gynecol 98:523–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Di Renzo GC, Branconi F, Anceschi MM et al (1998) Italian study group on pulse oximetry. Fetal Diagn Ther 13:46–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Amer-Wahlin I, Helisten C, Noren H et al (2001) Cardiotocography only vs. cardiotocography plus ST analysis of fetal electrocardiogram for intrapartum fetal monitoring: a Swedish randomised controlled trial. Lancet 358:534–538

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Amer-Wahlin I, Bordahl P, Eikeland T et al (2002) ST analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram during labor: Nordic observational multicenter study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 12:260–266

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Neilson JP, Mistry RT (2001) Fetal electrocardiogram plus heart rate recording (STAN) for fetal monitoring during labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2):CD000116

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centro di Diagnosi Prenatale Dipartimento di Scienze Ginecologiche Ostetriche e della Riproduzione, II Università degli Studi di Napoli, Napoli

    Antonio L. Borrelli

  2. Dipartimento di Scienze Ostetrico-Ginecologiche, Urologiche e Medicina della Riproduzione, Università degli Studi “Federico II”, Napoli

    Andrea Di Lieto

  3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University College Hospital, London, UK

    Paola Borrelli

Authors
  1. Antonio L. Borrelli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Andrea Di Lieto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Paola Borrelli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Italia

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Borrelli, A.L., Di Lieto, A., Borrelli, P. (2008). Monitoraggio delle condizioni fetali. In: Medicina dell’età prenatale. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-0688-1_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-0688-1_22

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Milano

  • Print ISBN: 978-88-470-0687-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-88-470-0688-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation