Abstract
Posterior capsule rupture (PCR) along with corneal endothelial decompensation constitutes one of the commonest complications of cataract surgery with vision-threatening consequences [1]. Vitreous loss as a consequence of PCR is a dreaded intraoperative complication of cataract surgery. If not managed appropriately, it can have disastrous consequences such as endothelial decompensation, retinal detachment, endophthalmitis, recurrent uveitis, intractable glaucoma, and severe visual disability including blindness. According to various studies, the incidence of PCR varies from 0.5 to 7.5 % [2, 3] and has shown a progressive decline with the evolution of surgical techniques and technology used in cataract surgery. Owing to the surgical learning curve, PCRs are more common among beginner surgeons [4]. Cataract surgery has seen tremendous evolution since Susruta described couching, more than 3000 years ago [5]. Extracapsular cataract extraction (ECCE), first performed by Jacques Daviel in Paris in 1747, dominated till the early 1900s. Intracapsular cataract extraction (ICCE) was introduced by Smith in 1880 [6]. The subsequent decades saw the development of the classic sutured large-incision extracapsular cataract extraction, phacoemulsification, and manual small-incision cataract extraction [7].
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Trinavarat A, Neerucha V. Visual outcome after cataract surgery complicated by posterior capsule rupture. J Med Assoc Thai. 2012;95 Suppl 4:S30–5.
Osher RH, Cionni RJ. The torn posterior capsule: its intraoperative behavior, surgical management, and long-term consequences. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1990;16(4):490–4.
Desai P, Minassian DC, Reidy A. National cataract surgery survey 1997–98: a report of the results of clinical outcomes. Br J Ophthalmol. 1999;83:1336–40.
Ti SE, Yang YN, Lang SS, Chee SP. A 5-year audit of cataract surgery outcomes after posterior capsule rupture and risk factors affecting visual acuity. Am J Ophthalmol. 2014;157(1):180–5.
Duke-Elder S. Sushruta Samhita-Uttar Tantra. In: Duke-Elder S, editor. System of ophthalmology, vol. II. London: Kimpton; 1969, Chap. 17, verses 57–70. p. 249.
Dobree JH, Sorsby A. Modern ophthalmology, vol 4. London: Butterworths; 1964, Chap. 12. p. 972-000.
Ascaso FJ, Huerva V. The history of cataract surgery, cataract surgery. 2013. In: Farhan Zaidi, editor. ISBN: 978-953-51-0975-4, InTech. doi:10.5772/19243. Available from: http://www.intechopen.com/books/cataract-surgery/the-history-of-cataract-surgery.
Apple DJ. Sir Harold Ridley and his fight for sight: he changed the world so that we may better see it. Thorofare: SLACK Incorporated; 2006.
Gimbel HV, Neuhann T. Development, advantages, and methods of the continuous circular capsulorhexis technique. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1990;16(1):31–7.
Gimbel HV. Posterior capsule tears using phacoemulsification-causes, prevention and management. Eur J Implant Refract Surg. 1990;2:63–9.
Stern WH. Anterior segment vitrectomy. Aust J Opthalmol. 1981;9:3–19.
Maumenee AE. Synposium: postoperative cataract complication. 111. Epithelial inversion of the anterior chamber: retinal detachment: corneal edema: anterior chamber hemorrhages: changes in the macula. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol. 1957;61:51.
Boyd BF, Maumene AE, McLean JM. Advances in cataract surgery: management of vitreous prolapse. Hghlts Ophthal. 1959;3:272.
Machemer R, Buettner H, Norton EWD, Parel J-M. Vitrectomy: a pars plana approach. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otola ryngol. 1971;75:813–20. 9.
Peyman GA, Dodich NA. Experimental vitrectomy instrumentation and surgical techniques. Arch Ophthalmol. 1971;86:548.
Narendran N, et al. The cataract national dataset electronic multicentre audit of 55 567 operations: risk stratification for posterior capsule rupture and vitreous loss. Eye (Lond). 2008;23(1):31–7.
Chang DF, Campbell JR. Intraoperative floppy iris syndrome associated with tamsulosin. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31(4):664–73.
Blomquist PH, Rugwani RM. Visual outcomes after vitreous loss during cataract surgery performed by residents. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002;28(5):847–52.
Yeoh R. The ‘pupil snap’ sign of posterior capsule rupture with hydrodissection in phacoemulsification. Br J Ophthalmol. 1996;80(5):486.
Fishkind WJ, editor. Complications in phacoemulsification: avoidance, recognition, and management. New York: Thieme; 2002.
Fine IH. Cortical cleaving hydrodissection. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1992;18(5):508–12.
Little B. Completing phaco following anterior capsular tear. Saudi J Ophthalmol. 2010;24(3):95–9.
Blomquist PH, Pluenneke AC. Decrease in complications during cataract surgery with the use of a silicone-tipped irrigation/aspiration instrument. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31(6):1194–7.
Couch SM, Bakri SJ. Use of triamcinolone during vitrectomy surgery to visualize membranes and vitreous. Clin Ophthalmol. 2008;2(4):891–6.
Dada T, Sharma N, Vajpayee RB, Dada VK. Conversion from phacoemulsification to extracapsular cataract extraction: incidence, risk factors, and visual outcome. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1998;24(11):1521–4.
Worst JGF, Los LI. Cisternal anatomy of the vitreous. Amsterdam/New York: Kugler Publications; 1995.
Oetting T. http://cataractsurgeryforgreenhorns.blogspot.in/.
LeBoyer RM, Werner L, Snyder ME, Mamalis N, Riemann CD, Augsberger JJ. Acute haptic-induced ciliary sulcus irritation associated with single-piece AcrySof intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31(7):1421–7.
Micheli T, Cheung LM, Sharma S, Assaad NN, Guzowski M, Francis IC, Norman J, Coroneo MT. Acute haptic-induced pigmentary glaucoma with an AcrySof intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002;28(10):1869–72.
Wintle R, Austin M. Pigment dispersion with elevated intraocular pressure after AcrySof intraocular lens implantation in the ciliary sulcus. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001;27(4):642–4.
Barry P, Behrens-Baumann W, Pleyer U, Seal D. ESCRS guidelines on prevention, investigation and management of post-operative endophtalmitis. Version 2. Santen. Eur Soc Cataract Refract Surg. 2007:1–37. http://www.escrs.org/vienna2011/programme/handouts/ic-100/ic-100_barry_handout.pdf.
Financial Interests
None of the authors have any financial interests in any company or product mentioned in the text.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
1 Electronic Supplementary Material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
(MPG 1860760 kb)
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer India
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Das, S., Kurian, M., Srivatsa, P.R., Negalur, N. (2017). Management of Posterior Capsule Rent: Various Case Scenarios. In: Chakrabarti, A. (eds) Posterior Capsular Rent. Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-3586-6_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-3586-6_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New Delhi
Print ISBN: 978-81-322-3584-2
Online ISBN: 978-81-322-3586-6
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)