Skip to main content

Impact of Automated Hotspot Detection for 18FET PET-Guided Stereotactic Biopsy

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Acta Neurochirurgica Supplement ((NEUROCHIRURGICA,volume 117))

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to explore the impact of automated hotspot detection on surgical planning of 18FET PET-guided stereotactic serial biopsy.

Method: Imaging of ten patients with brain lesions detected by MRI and showing increased 18FET uptake on PET who were retrospectively and randomly assigned to compose the study. Stereotactic biopsy plans (PET-guided and MR-guided) were performed by two neurosurgeons for each patient, independently and blinded. For PET-guided plans, biopsy target was achieved by means of an automated hotspot detection system. MR-guided plans targeted contrast enhancement areas or hyperintense areas in T2-weighted sequences. FET uptake ratio (UR) was determined in the biopsy trajectory across the lesion. Highest UR (HUR) from both planning techniques was compared.

Results: Each single HUR obtained through PET-guided technique was higher than correspondent values from MR-guided technique. Mean HUR of 2.41 (SE ± 0.23) for PET-guided plans and 1.85 (±0.16) for MR-guided plans were respectively obtained. This difference was statistically significant (p = 0.002).

Conclusion: The use of an automated hotspot detection system was able to provide higher FET HUR along stereotactic biopsy trajectories in comparison to those from MR-guided plans. The use of specially designed computational tools may refine surgical planning by improving biopsy targeting.

Thomas Reithmeier and Joacir Cordeiro contributed equally to the work described in this manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Benouaich-Amiel A, Lubrano V, Tafani M, Uro-coste E, Gantet P, Sol JC et al (2010) Evaluation of O-(2-[18F]-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine in the diagnosis of glioblastoma. Arch Neurol 67(3):370–372

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Candrasoma PT, Smith MM, Apuzzo ML et al (1989) Stereotactic biopsy in the diagnosis of brain masses: comparison of results from biopsy and resected surgical specimen. Neurosurgery 24:160–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cordeiro JG, Rottenburger C, Pinsker M, Trippel M, Weber W, Nikkhah G, Reithmeier T (2010) Value of 18F-FET PET in comparison to stereotactic serial biopsy to evaluate the follow up of brain gliomas. Presented in the 19th congress of the European Society Stereotaxic and Functional Neurosurgery, Athens

    Google Scholar 

  4. Del Sole A, Falini A, Ravasi L, Ottobrini L, De Marchis D, Bombardieri E et al (2001) Anatomical and biochemical investigation of primary brain tumours. Eur J Nucl Med 28:1851–1872

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Floeth FW, Pauleit D, Wittsack H et al (2005) Multimodal metabolic imaging of cerebral gliomas: positron emission tomography with [18F]fluoroethyl-L-tyrosine and magnetic resonance spectroscopy. J Neurosurg 102(2):318–327

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Floeth FW, Pauleit D, Sabel M et al (2006) 18F-FET PET differentiation of ring-enhancing brain lesions. J Nucl Med 47(5):776–782

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Grosu AL, Weber WA, Franz M et al (2005) Reirradiation of recurrent high-grade gliomas using amino acid PET (SPECT)/CT/MRI image fusion to determine gross tumor volume for stereotactic fractionated radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 63(2):511–519

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hamacher K, Coenen HH (2002) Efficient routine production of the 18Flabelled amino acid O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine. Appl Radiat Isot 57:853–856

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Jackson RJ, Fuller GN, Abi-Said D et al (2001) Limitations of stereotactic biopsy in the initial management of gliomas. Neuro Oncol 3:193–200

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Jacobs A (1995) Amino acid uptake in ischemically compromised brain tissue. Stroke 26:1859–1866

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Langen K, Hamacher K, Weckesser M et al (2006) O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine: uptake mechanisms and clinical applications. Nucl Med Biol 33(3):287–294

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Mc Girt MJ, Villavicencio AT, Ketan RB, Friedman AH (2003) MRI-guided stereotactic biopsy in the diagnosis of glioma: comparison of biopsy and surgical resection specimen. Surg Neurol 59:277–282

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nakagawa M, Kuwabara Y, Sasaki M, Koga H, Chen T, Kaneko O et al (2002) 11C-Methionine uptake in cerebrovascular disease: a comparison with 18F-FDG PET and 99mTc-HMPAO SPECT. Ann Nucl Med 16:207–211

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Pauleit D, Stoffels G, Bachofner A et al (2009) Comparison of (18)F-FET and (18)F-FDG PET in brain tumors. Nucl Med Biol 36(7):779–787

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Pirotte BJM, Lubansu A, Massager N et al (2007) Results of positron emission tomography guidance and reassessment of the utility of and indications for stereotactic biopsy in children with infiltrative brainstem tumors. J Neurosurg 107(5 Suppl):392–399

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Pöpperl G, Kreth FW, Herms J et al (2006) Analysis of 18F-FET PET for grading of recurrent gliomas: is evaluation of uptake kinetics superior to standard methods? J Nucl Med 47(3):393–403

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Pöpperl G, Kreth FW, Mehrkens JH et al (2007) FET PET for the evaluation of untreated gliomas: correlation of FET uptake and uptake kinetics with tumour grading. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 34(12):1933–1942

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rottenburger C, Doostkam S, Prinz M, Meckel S, Nikkhah G, Meyer P, Reithmeier T (2010) Interesting image. Amino acid PET tracer accumulation in cortical ischemia: an interesting case. Clin Nucl Med 35(11):907–908

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Rottenburger C, Hentschel M, Kelly T, Trippel M, Brink I, Reithmeier T, Meyer PT, Nikkhah G (2011) Comparison of C-11 methionine and C-11 choline for PET imaging of brain metastases: a prospective pilot study. Clin Nucl Med 36(8):639–642

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Stadlbauer A, Prante O, Nimsky C et al (2008) Metabolic imaging of cerebral gliomas: spatial correlation of changes in O-(2-18F-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine PET and proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging. J Nucl Med 49(5):721–729

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Weber WA, Wester HJ, Grosu AL et al (2000) O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine and L-[methyl-11C] methionine uptake in brain tumours: initial results of a comparative study. Eur J Nucl Med 27(5):542–549

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by a grant from Inomed, Emmendingen, Germany. Authors would like to thank Dr. Graf from the Department of Statistics of the University of Freiburg for the support in the statistical analysis.

Conflict of InterestCordeiro JG was financially supported by Inomed to perform systematic evaluation of computational tools developed for the neurosurgical practice. We confirm that we have read the Journal’s position on issues involved in ethical publication, and affirm that this report is consistent with those guidelines.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Reithmeier MD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Wien

About this paper

Cite this paper

Reithmeier, T., Cordeiro, J., Mix, M., Trippel, M., Rottenburger, C., Nikkhah, G. (2013). Impact of Automated Hotspot Detection for 18FET PET-Guided Stereotactic Biopsy. In: Nikkhah, G., Pinsker, M. (eds) Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery. Acta Neurochirurgica Supplement, vol 117. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-1482-7_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-1482-7_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7091-1481-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-7091-1482-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics