Abstract
A great deal of man-made residue and emissions is connected with the energy economy—from extraction, transformation, and transportation on to the final use of energy. Concepts have been developed in environmental economics for solving the associated problems in an economically efficient way. They revolve around the terms externality, external cost, and avoidance cost (also called abatement cost). Provided damages and risks can be quantified and monetized, internalization strategies are available which shift external costs back to the consumers of energy in the guise of higher energy prices. Market participants are made to extend their avoidance effort to the point where the marginal abatement cost equals marginal damage cost avoided. This is the social optimum.
While these lines of thought look conceptually simple enough, there are several issues that need to be addressed:
-
How can externalities be linked to specific emissions?
-
How are they to be quantified and expressed in money as to become external costs?
-
Frequently, marginal external cost avoided cannot be easily measured, as e.g. in the case of improved air quality. How is one to proceed for determining the optimum?
-
An economic expression of the marginal benefit of avoidance is (marginal) willingness to pay of those affected by the externality. Are there ways to measure this?
-
So-called market experiments have become popular for estimating willingness to pay. How can they be performed? What are their limitations?
-
The so-called standard-price constitutes an alternative. In what circumstances is it to be recommended?
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Baumol, W. J., & Oates, W. E. (1988). The theory of environmental policy (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Coase, R. (1960). The problem of social cost. Journal of Law and Economics, 1, 1–44.
Cummings, R. G., et al. (1986). Valuing environmental goods: An assessment of the contingent valuation method. Towata, NJ: Rowan & Allanheld.
Dales, J. (1968). Pollution, property & prices: An essay in policy-making and economics. New horizons in environmental economics. Toronto: Toronto University Press (reprinted by Edward Elgar Publishing 2002).
ExternE. (2003). External costs. Research results on socio-environmental damages due to electricity and transport (ExternE project). Luxemburg.
Hausman, J. A. (Ed.). (1993). Contingent valuation. A critical assessment. Amsterdam: North Holland.
Mas-Colell, A., Winston, M. D., & Green, J. R. (1995). Microeconomic theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pearce, D. W., & Turner, R. D. (1990). Economics of natural resources and the environment. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Pigou, A. C. (1932). The economics of welfare (4th ed.). New York: Macmillan.
Schneider, Y., & Zweifel, P. (2004). How much internalization of nuclear risk through liability insurance? Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 29(3), 219–240.
Shavell, S. (1984). A model of the optimal use of liability and safety regulation. Rand Journal of Economics, 15(2), 271–280.
Zweifel, P., & Tyran, J. R. (1994). Environmental impairment liability as an instrument of environmental policy. Ecological Economics, 11(1), 43–56.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Zweifel, P., Praktiknjo, A., Erdmann, G. (2017). External Costs. In: Energy Economics. Springer Texts in Business and Economics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-53022-1_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-53022-1_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-53020-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-53022-1
eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)