Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Praxishandbuch Professionelle Mediation pp 1–11Cite as

Der Mediator: Katalysator der Mediation

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Springer Reference Psychologie ((SRP))

Zusammenfassung

Der katalytische Mediator ist ein pragmatischer Gegenvorschlag zur klassischen Haltung der Neutralität in der Mediation. Mit dem Ziel, die Medianten füreinander passungsfähiger zu machen, strukturiert der katalytisch agierende Mediator die Wahrnehmung und Interaktionsmöglichkeiten seiner Medianten. Als Leitmotive dienen ihm deren Interessen und Ressourcen, sowie deren Motivation und ihre persönlichen Eigenschaften. Der folgende Beitrag zeigt auf, was ein katalytischer Mediator ist und wie diese Haltung in der Praxis umgesetzt werden kann.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Literatur

  • Bagshaw, D. (2015). Mediation in the World today: Opportunities and challenges. Journal of Mediation & Applied Conflict Analysis, 3(1), 187–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, S. E., Folger, J. P., Weingarten, H. R., & Zumeta, Z. R. (1984). The neutral mediator: Value dilemmas in divorce mediation. Mediation Quarterly, 4, 61–74. https://doi.org/10.1002/crq.39019840406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brodie, H., & Harnack, K. (2018). The trust mandate. Hampshire: Harriman House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, L., Martin, R. A., & Ward, J. R. (2008). An observational study of humor use while resolving conflict in dating couples. Personal Relationships, 15(1), 41–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2007.00183.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, O., Dattner, N., & Luxenburg, A. (1999). The limits of the mediator’s neutrality. Mediation Quarterly, 16(4), 341–348. https://doi.org/10.1002/crq.3900160404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crowe, E., & Higgins, E. T. (1997). Regulatory focus and strategic inclinations: Promotion and prevention in decision-making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69(2), 117–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Dreu, C. K. W., Carnevale, P. J., Emans, B. J., & Van De Vliert, E. (1994). Effects of gain-loss frames in negotiation: Loss aversion, mismatching, and frame adoption. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 60, 90–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Dreu, C. K. W., Koole, S. L., & Oldersma, F. L. (1999). On the seizing and freezing of negotiator inferences: Need for cognitive closure moderates the use of heuristics in negotiation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 348–362. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167299025003007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Dreu, C. K. W. (2003). Time pressure and closing of the mind in negotiation. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 91, 280–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, S. (2008). Neutrality in mediation: A study of mediator perceptions. Queensland University of Technology Law and Justice Journal, 8, 139–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Druckman, D., & Wagner, L. M. (2016). Justice and negotiation. Annual Review of Psychology, 67, 387–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg, M., & Willer, R. (2015). From gulf to bridge: When do moral arguments facilitate political influence? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(12), 1665–1681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galinsky, A. D., Leonardelli, G. J., Okhuysen, G. A., & Mussweiler, T. (2005). Regulatory focus at the bargaining table: Promoting distributive and integrative success. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1087–1098. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167205276429.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gerami, A. (2009). Bridging the theory-and-practice gap: Mediator power in practice. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 26(4), 433–451. https://doi.org/10.1002/crq.242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, K., Thompson, L., & Bazerman, M. H. (1996). Shortcomings of neutrality in mediation: Solutions based on rationality. Negotiation Journal, 12(1), 69–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1571-9979.1996.tb00079.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gross, A. (2016). Raising awareness of potential biases and microaggressions: Applications to mediation. Journal of Mediation & Applied Conflict Analysis, 3(1), 73–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harnack, K. (2016). A psychological toolbox for mediators: From theory and research to best practices. In K. Bollen, M. Euwema & L. Munduate (Hrsg.), Advancing workplace mediation through integration of theory and practice (S. 55–66). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42842-0_4.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, S. (2002). Maintaining neutrality in dispute mediation: Managing disagreement while managing not to disagree. Journal of Pragmatics, 34(10), 1403–1426. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00071-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kracht, S. (2002). Rolle und Aufgabe des Mediators Prinzipien der Mediation. In F. Haft & K. Schlieffen (Hrsg.), Handbuch mediation – methoden und Technik, Rechtsgrundlagen, Einsatzgebiete (S. 363). München: C.H. Beck Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruglanski, A. W. (2013). The psychology of closed mindedness. New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindström, B. a., & Pettersson, L. J. (2003). A brief history of catalysis. CATTECH, 7(4), 130–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCorkle, S. (2005). The murky world of mediation ethics: Neutrality, impartiality, and conflict of interest in state codes of conduct. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 23(2), 165–183. https://doi.org/10.1002/crq.131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrow, S. L. (2005). Quality and trustworthiness in qualitative research in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(2), 250–260. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicolau, G., & Cormick, G. W. (1972). Community disputes and the resolution of conflict: Another view. The Arbitration Journal, 27(2), 98–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oesper, R. B. (1948). Alwin Mittasch. Journal of Chemical Education, 25(10), 531–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petelczyc, C. A., Capezio, A., Wang, L., Restubog, S. L. D., & Aquino, K. (2017). Play at work: An integrative review and agenda for future research. Journal of Management, 161–190. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206317731519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, E. (1958). The mediator: A neutral a catalyst or a leader. Labor Law J, 9, 764–769.

    Google Scholar 

  • Proyer, R. T. (2013). The well-being of playful adults: Adult playfulness, subjective well-being, physical well-being, and the pursuit of enjoyable activities. The European Journal of Humour Research, 1(1), 84–98. https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-78008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, P. M. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlink, S., & Walther, E. (2007). Kurz und gut: Eine deutsche Kurzskala zur Erfassung des Bedürfnisses nach kognitiver Geschlossenheit. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 38(3), 153–161. https://doi.org/10.1024/0044-3514.38.3.153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steininger, B. (2008). Katalysator: Annäherung an einen Schlüsselbegriff des 20. Jahrhunderts. In E. Müller & F. Schmieder (Hrsg.), Begriffsgeschichte der Naturwissenschaften: zur historischen und kulturellen Dimension naturwissenschaftlicher Konzepte (S. 53–71). Berlin/New York: De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tahan, M. (1993). The man who counted: a collection of mathematical adventures. New York: WW Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J. (2015). Neutral, biased, or both? Discursive construction of a mediator’s dual role. Negotiation Journal, 31(1), 47–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/nejo.12079.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. WOP – Institute of Psychology, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Münster, Deutschland

    Klaus Harnack

Authors
  1. Klaus Harnack
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Klaus Harnack .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Rechtswiss Fakultät, AVZ I, FernUniversität Hagen, Hagen, Germany

    Stefan Kracht

  2. FG Privat-und Gesellschaftsrecht, HS Harz, Halberstadt, Germany

    Andre Niedostadek

  3. Abtl. Rechtswissenschaften, FH für öffentliche Verwaltung NRW, Münster, Germany

    Patrick Sensburg

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Harnack, K. (2018). Der Mediator: Katalysator der Mediation. In: Kracht, S., Niedostadek, A., Sensburg, P. (eds) Praxishandbuch Professionelle Mediation. Springer Reference Psychologie . Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-49657-2_26-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-49657-2_26-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-49657-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-49657-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Referenz Psychologie

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation