Skip to main content

Behavioural Investigations of Financial Trading Agents Using Exchange Portal (ExPo)

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Transactions on Computational Collective Intelligence XVII

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((TCCI,volume 8790))

Abstract

Some major financial markets are currently reporting that 50 % or more of all transactions are now executed by automated trading systems (ATS). To understand the impact of ATS proliferation on the global financial markets, academic studies often use standard reference strategies, such as “AA” and “ZIP”, to model the behaviour of real trading systems. Disturbingly, we show that the reference algorithms presented in the literature are ambiguous, thus reducing the validity of strict comparative studies. As a remedy, we suggest disambiguated standard implementations of AA and ZIP. Using Exchange Portal (ExPo), an open-source financial exchange simulation platform designed for real-time behavioural economic experiments involving human traders and/or trader-agents, we study the effects of disambiguating AA and ZIP, before introducing a novel method of assignment-adaptation (ASAD). Experiments show that introducing ASAD agents into a market with shocks can produce counter-intuitive market dynamics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The final report from that investigation was published in Oct. 2012, and is available at: http://bit.ly/UvGE4Q.

  2. 2.

    For an earlier version of the work presented here, we refer the reader to [23].

  3. 3.

    We do not suggest that two is the optimum multiplier for this equation; rather we aim to investigate the effect of introducing this modification and select two as a simple heuristic estimate.

  4. 4.

    For a lengthy discussion on the consequences of the max spread rule, see [5].

  5. 5.

    Since this issue was raised by [5], the spread jumping rule has subsequently been classified as a bug and removed from De Luca’s OpEx AA agents (http://sourceforge.net/p/open-exchange/tickets/1/).

References

  1. Cartlidge, J., Ait-Boudaoud, D.: Autonomous virulence adaptation improves coevolutionary optimisation. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 15(2), 215–229 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cartlidge, J.: Trading experiments using financial agents in a simulated cloud computing commodity market. In: Duval, B., van den Herik, J., Loiseau, S., Filipe, J. (eds.) 6th International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligent, Agents (ICAART-2014), vol. 2, pp. 311–317. SciTePress, March 2014

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cartlidge, J., Bullock, S.: Caring versus sharing: how to maintain engagement and diversity in coevolving populations. In: Banzhaf, W., Ziegler, J., Christaller, T., Dittrich, P., Kim, J.T. (eds.) ECAL 2003. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2801, pp. 299–308. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Cartlidge, J., Bullock, S.: Unpicking tartan CIAO plots: understanding irregular coevolutionary cycling. Adapt. Behav. 12(2), 69–92 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cartlidge, J., Cliff, D.: Exploring the “robot phase transition” in experimental human-algorithmic markets. The Future of Computer Trading in Financial Markets-Foresight Driver Review-DR25, Crown Copyright, Oct 2012. http://bitly.com/SvqohP

  6. Cartlidge, J., Cliff, D.: Evidencing the “robot phase transition” in experimental human-algorithmic markets. In: Filipe, J., Fred, A. (eds.) 5th International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligent, Agents (ICAART-2013), vol. 1, pp. 345–352. SciTePress, Feb 2013

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cartlidge, J., Szostek, C., De Luca, M., Cliff, D.: Too fast too furious: faster financial-market trading agents can give less efficient markets. In: Filipe, J., Fred, A. (eds.) 4th International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligent, Agents (ICAART-2012), vol. 2, pp. 126–135. SciTePress, Feb 2012

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cliff, D.: Minimal-intelligence agents for bargaining behaviors in market-based environments. Technical report, HPL-97-91, Hewlett-Packard Labs, Aug 1997. http://bit.ly/18uC9vM

  9. Das, R., Hanson, J., Kephart, J., Tesauro, G.: Agent-human interactions in the continuous double auction. In: Nebel, B. (ed.) 17th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligent (IJCAI-01), pp. 1169–1176. Morgan Kaufmann, Aug 2001

    Google Scholar 

  10. De Luca, M., Cliff, D.: Agent-human interactions in the continuous double auction, redux: using the OpEx lab-in-a-box to explore ZIP and GDX. In: Filipe, J., Fred, A. (eds.) 3rd International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligent (ICAART-2011), pp. 351–358. SciTePress, Jan 2011

    Google Scholar 

  11. De Luca, M., Cliff, D.: Human-agent auction interactions: adaptive-aggressive agents dominate. In: Walsh, T. (ed.) 22nd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligent (IJCAI-11), pp. 178–185. AAAI Press, Jul 2011

    Google Scholar 

  12. De Luca, M., Szostek, C., Cartlidge, J., Cliff, D.: Studies of interactions between human traders and algorithmic trading systems. The Future of Computer Trading in Financial Markets-Foresight Driver Review-DR13, Crown Copyright, Sep 2011. http://bitly.com/RoifIu

  13. ExPo: The Exchange Portal, Mar 2012. http://sourceforge.net/projects/exchangeportal/

  14. Feltovich, N.: Nonparametric tests of differences in medians: comparison of the wilcoxon-mann-whitney and robust rank-order tests. Exp. Econ. 6, 273–297 (2003)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Feltovich, N.: Critical values for the robust rank-order test. Commun. Stat. Simul. Comput. 34(3), 525–547 (2005)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Gjerstad, S., Dickhaut, J.: Price formation in double auctions. Games Econ. Behav. 22(1), 1–29 (1998)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Gode, D., Sunder, S.: Allocative efficiency of markets with zero-intelligence traders: markets as a partial substitute for individual rationality. J. Polit. Econ. 101(1), 119–137 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. OpEx: Open Exchange software, Mar 2012. https://sourceforge.net/projects/open-exchange/

  19. Preist, C., van Tol, M.: Adaptive agents in a persistent shout double auction. In: 1st International Conference on Information and Computation Economies, pp. 11–18. ACM Press (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Smith, V.: An experimental study of comparative market behavior. J. Polit. Econ. 70, 111–137 (1962)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Stock, J.H., Watson, M.M.: Introduction to Econometrics, Chap. 4, 3rd edn. Pearson, Upper Saddle River (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Stotter, S.: Improving the strategies of algorithmic traders and investigating further realism in their market environment. Master’s thesis, Department of Computer Science: University of Bristol, UK, July 2012

    Google Scholar 

  23. Stotter, S., Cartlidge, J., Cliff, D.: Exploring assignment-adaptive (ASAD) trading agents in financial market experiments. In: Filipe, J., Fred, A.L.N. (eds.) 5th International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligent, Agents (ICAART-2013), vol. 1, pp. 77–88. SciTePress, Feb 2013

    Google Scholar 

  24. Tesauro, G., Das, R.: High-performance bidding agents for the continuous double auction. In: ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, pp. 206–209. ACM Press (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  25. van Montfort, G.P.R., Bruten, J., Rothkrantz, L.: Arbitrageurs in segmented markets. Technical report, HPL-97-120, Hewlett-Packard Labs, Oct 1997. http://www.hpl.hp.com/techreports/97/HPL-97-120.pdf

  26. Vytelingum, P.: The structure and behaviour of the continuous double auction. Ph.D. thesis, School of Electronics and Computer Science, University of Southampton, UK (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Vytelingum, P., Dash, R.K., David, E., Jennings, N.R.: A risk-based bidding strategy for continuous double auctions. In: López de Mánataras, R., Saitta, L. (eds.) 16th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI-2004), pp. 79–83. IOS Press (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Widrow, B., Hoff, Jr., M.E.: Adaptive switching circuits. In: Institute of Radio Engineers, Western Electron, Show and Convention (IRE WESCON), Convention Record, Part 4, pp. 96–104, Aug 1960

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Tomas Gražys for significant development of the ExPo platform. John Cartlidge is supported by EPSRC grant, number EP/H042644/1; primary financial support for Dave Cliff’s research comes from EPSRC grant, number EP/F001096/1.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Cartlidge .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stotter, S., Cartlidge, J., Cliff, D. (2014). Behavioural Investigations of Financial Trading Agents Using Exchange Portal (ExPo). In: Nguyen, N., Kowalczyk, R., Fred, A., Joaquim, F. (eds) Transactions on Computational Collective Intelligence XVII. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8790. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44994-3_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44994-3_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-44993-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-44994-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics