Skip to main content

Mass Anomalies of Earth, Venus, and Mars: Initial Estimates

  • Conference paper
Book cover Gravity, Geoid and Marine Geodesy

Part of the book series: International Association of Geodesy Symposia ((IAG SYMPOSIA,volume 117))

  • 433 Accesses

Abstract

Sets of planetary spherical harmonic coefficients, because they depict the gravity potential field from the planet surface into the surrounding space, offer two means for estimating the magnitudes of causative mass anomalies. One is from simple ratios, at anomaly centers, of the vertical derivative of the potential (gravity) by its integral (geoid) anomaly value. That ratio gives an estimate of an equivalent point mass depth, and then using that depth with either of the anomaly values used in computing the ratio, a mass estimate is obtained for the equivalent point mass. The ratio of the depths obtained by the gravity over geoid values, divided by the vertical gravity gradient over gravity values, tests the degree to which contributing mass anomalies are co-centric and at a common depth, by deviation from a value of 1.0. The second method analyzes individual harmonic degree contributions, and their consistency for evaluating causative masses. So far this last method has only rigorously been applied to the Earth, revealing that the greatest mass anomalies (about 9×1022 grams) probably result from topography at the core-mantle boundary. [the corresponding simple ratio mass estimates are 1.4 − 1.8×1022 grams] The largest Venus geoid anomaly features have ratio estimated masses of 1.2×1022 and 8.1×1021 grams (with depth ratios of 1.09 and 1.3). Most of Venus’ anomaly features have depth ratio values within 1/10 of 1.0. The three largest Mars geoid anomaly features all correlate with positive topography features and have ratio estimated masses of 5.4, 4.6, and 2.4×1022 grams, but their depth ratio values are 0.71, 0.65, 0.76 (all Mars’ depth ratio values are less than 0.85), indicating more complex structures than on Venus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bowin, Carl, 1983, Depth of principal mass anomalies contributing to the Earth’s geoidal undulations and gravity anomalies, Marine Geodesy, V. 7, 61–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowin, Carl, 1991, Earth’s gravity field and plate tectonics, Texas AM Geodynamics Silver Anniversary of Plate Tectonics Symposium, Tectonophysics, 187, pp. 69–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowin, Carl, 1994, The geoid and deep Earth mass anomaly structure, in: Geoid and its geophysical Interpretations, Ed. Petr Vanicek, Nikolas T. Christou, CRC Press, Chap. 10, p. 203–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowin, Carl, Edward Scheer and Woolcott Smith, 1986, Depth estimates from ratios of gravity, geoid, and gravity gradient anomalies, Geophysics, v. 51 (1), p. 123–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, J.G., F.J. Lerch, B.H. Putney, T.L. Felsentreger, B..V. Sanchez, Steve M. Kloskpo, G.B. Patel, John W. Robbins, Ronald G. Williamson, T.L. Engelis, W.F. Eddy, N.L. Chandler, D.S. Chinn, S.Kapoor, K.E. Rachlin, L.E. Braatz, and Erricos S. Pavlis 1990, The GEM-T2 gravitational model, J. Geophys. Res., v. 95, no. 13, p. 22043–22071.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakiboglu, S. M. 1982, Hydrostatic theory of the Earth and its mechanical implications, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., v. 28, p. 302–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nerem, T. S., B.G. Bills and J. B. McNamee, 1993, A high Resolution Gravity Model for Venus: GVM-1, Geophysical Res., v. 20, no. 7, p. 599–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Keefe, J.A. and W.M. Kaula, 1963, Stress differences and the reference ellipsoid, Science, v. 142, p. 382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, R.J. and Kurt, 1980, Gravity fields of the Terrestrial Planets; L on-Wavelength Anomalies and Tectonics, Rev. Geophys. and Space Physics, v. 18, p. 27–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D., F.J. Lerch, R.S. Nerem, 1993, An improved gravity model for Mars: Goddard Mars Model-1, J. Geophys. Res. Planets, v. 98, no. 11, 20871–20889.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka, S. and H. Hamaguchi, 1993, degree one heterogeneity at the top of the Earth’s core, revealed by SmKS travel times, Dynamics of the Earth’s Deep Interior and Earth Rotation, Geophys. Mon. 72, IUGG, 12, 127–134.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bowin, C. (1997). Mass Anomalies of Earth, Venus, and Mars: Initial Estimates. In: Segawa, J., Fujimoto, H., Okubo, S. (eds) Gravity, Geoid and Marine Geodesy. International Association of Geodesy Symposia, vol 117. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03482-8_36

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03482-8_36

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-08328-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-03482-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics